10 measurements spanning 23 days, net +1,285. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,872–10,612 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 19:11
7,289
-195
27 Aug 2026, 22:17
7,484
-2,081
24 Aug 2026, 14:16
9,565
-132
20 Aug 2026, 14:52
9,697
-124
17 Aug 2026, 09:43
9,821
-129
13 Aug 2026, 14:38
9,950
+4,416
10 Aug 2026, 19:21
5,534
-327
7 Aug 2026, 22:53
5,861
-143
7 Aug 2026, 17:01
6,004
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:49
6,004
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 21 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
27s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
307 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
229
74.6%
😁
35
11.4%
🦄
25
8.14%
🙏
6
1.95%
🫡
5
1.63%
🥴
3
0.977%
😇
2
0.651%
🤝
2
0.651%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2025 to 27 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 17 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FloodHackingChannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2025 to 27 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌐 HOW TO REPORT A SCAM WEBSITE (STEP BY STEP)
If you find a fraudulent or scam website, you can help take it down by reporting it to the hosting provider.
Here’s how:
1. 🔍 Identify the hosting provider
Use tools like WHOIS lookup (whois.domaintools.com) or hosting checkers to find where the website is hosted.
2. ✉️ Find abuse contact
Look for “[email protected]” or “report abuse” on the provider’s website.
…
🌐 ORGANIZED CYBERCRIME (2026)
Scams are no longer random.
They are run by professional groups:
🔒 Scripts
🔒 Automation
🔒 Global operations
🚫 Stay informed. Stay protected.
🚨 FAKE AUTHORITY SCAMS
“They pretend to be police or government.”
They threaten you → demand payment.
🔒 Real authorities NEVER ask for money via messages.
Stay calm. Verify.
📞 SIM SWAP ATTACKS
Scammers take control of your phone number.
Then:
🚫 Access your bank
🚫 Reset your accounts
⚠️ Protect yourself:
🌐 Enable 2FA
🌐 Contact your carrier for extra security
🤑 CRYPTO SCAMS ARE EVOLVING
“Invest now and double your money”
Fake platforms. Fake profits. Real losses.
🚫 No legit investment guarantees profit.
Think before you invest.
📸 QR CODE SCAMS (QUISHING)
Fake QR codes in public places or online.
You scan → fake website → stolen data.
🚫 Always double-check before scanning unknown QR codes.
🚨 SMS SCAMS (SMISHING)
“Your package is delayed”
“Your bank account is locked”
🔍 Fake links designed to steal your data.
🚫 NEVER click links from unknown messages.
🥰 ROMANCE SCAMS ARE BACK (STRONGER THAN EVER)
They build trust for weeks or months…
Then suddenly:
“I need money, it’s an emergency.”
🚫 If someone you never met asks for money → it’s a scam.
Protect yourself.
🛡 AI SCAM ALERT (2026)
Scammers are now cloning voices using AI.
They can sound exactly like your family, boss, or friends — asking for urgent money.
🚫 Always verify with a real call before sending anything.
Stay alert.
English:
"Happy 12th Anniversary, Telegram! 1️⃣2️⃣
Twelve years of innovation, freedom, and being the best messaging app. Here’s to many more years of connecting the world!"
Español:
"¡Feliz 12º Aniversario, Telegram! 1️⃣2️⃣
Doce años de innovación, libertad y de ser la mejor aplicación de mensajería. ¡Por muchos más conectando al mundo!"
🦄11❤6😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @FloodHackingChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 302,035 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
FloodHacking is a digital security initiative focused on identifying and reporting illegal or harmful activities on the internet. The organization operates primarily through Telegram
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FloodHacking Organization🤝” (@FloodHackingChannel), 7,289 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FloodHackingChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
