Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FlipThink

Channel

FlipThink

@FlipThink

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001592770384
TypeChannel
Username@FlipThink
Description☎️+84.969.288.222 or @rionguyen222
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/FlipThink

Growth

259 August 2026 — 25 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25 subscribers9 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24–26 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 10:0425no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:4625first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 28 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 25 subscribers
Avg views / post
3.0
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held7 (28 April 202610 August 2026)
Views total12
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
60
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 23:52 UTC1 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

😎This bot generates massive profits! Octopus thrives on high volatility—the stronger the market swings, the higher the profit—and it even makes money during sideways markets :)) ✅Download the bot to run a demo at: loadingrich.com ✅Track the account at: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Nhatka/octopus-bbs/12121642

5 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC7 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🐙✅Bot Octopus take profit 5%.✅ Today August 5, 2026 If you're interested in running the bot, please send me a private message.

2 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC3 viewsread 11 August 2026

The most important point is not simply how much profit Octopus ARTS generated during the month. What matters is that the EA demonstrated its ability to operate in two very different market environments: sideways conditions and strong directional trends. Octopus ARTS knows when to secure profits after reaching its target. More importantly, when the market develops a strong trend, it is designed to let profitable posit

2 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC1 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

OCTOPUS ARTS — JULY 2026 REVIEW July was the first month of live trading for Octopus ARTS. Despite gold trading mostly sideways, both real accounts closed the month in profit: • BBS Markets: +14.77% • MH Markets: +17.64% • Drawdown: 25.43%–28.22% Octopus ARTS is not designed to win every trade. Its goal is to follow the dominant trend, control losses and let profitable positions run long enough to recover earlier

22 Jul 2026, 16:18 UTC4 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🐙 Octopus-King achieves 10% profit July 22, 2026 Profit of $12,000 Minimum test capital: $500 (cents) Safe capital: $1,000 (cents) First week free for you to test and experience You can follow along at: https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/octopus/12121642

30 Apr 2026, 11:14 UTC22 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Here's a summary of yesterday's actual profits, guys. Copying with a minimum of $50 is enough to succeed. - My experience in holding onto profits and cutting losses early is sufficient; the target profit is 5-10% per month, and since it's running at cents, it's very safe, my dears. Copy link: - https://secure.vantagemarkets.com/copyTrading/discover/discoverDetail?strategyId=1054380&tab=0

28 Apr 2026, 15:23 UTC15 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🚀Finally, both master accounts have broken even thanks to today's strong downtrend. 😂Actually, it was due to taking profits too early above 4652. If the account hadn't been down 5% last week, Rio would have held on until today and made a 10% profit. But anyway, the goal is to break even first, then we'll think about the rest. The market is still long, gold still has a few more price swings of 200-300, so there's no

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @FlipThink. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 558,084 of 1,584,486entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FlipThink” (@FlipThink), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FlipThink.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.