Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Flint

Channel

Flint

@Flintdotmoney

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,534subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001781146422
TypeChannel
Username@Flintdotmoney
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 14 October 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Flintdotmoney

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,5347,5597,546.57 August 2026 — 7,559 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,559 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,558 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,554 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,555 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,554 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,552 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,551 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,550 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,546 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,547 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,539 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,534 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,530–7,563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:177,534-5
14 Sept 2026, 18:397,539-8
11 Sept 2026, 04:017,547+1
6 Sept 2026, 15:017,546-4
1 Sept 2026, 18:467,550-1
29 Aug 2026, 15:577,551-1
26 Aug 2026, 12:437,552-2
23 Aug 2026, 17:077,554-1
20 Aug 2026, 06:467,555+1
13 Aug 2026, 23:177,554-4
10 Aug 2026, 17:457,558-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:307,559no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:237,559first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 October 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

188 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13973.9%
🔥3719.7%
73.72%
👏21.06%
🎉10.532%
😁10.532%
🤯10.532%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2022 to 3 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2023, 15:09 UTC≈3,880 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @logx_announcementsPhoto

Excited to announce the much-awaited Discord of LogX 🔥🔥 Being 'early' is rewarding! And this is your best chance to be 'early' 🪵 Join now, and become a part of the early action: discord.gg/qAuMHaGqXn

👍5🔥5🤯1

10 Jun 2023, 12:45 UTC≈4,150 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Reminder to join LogX announcements channel 👉 https://t.me/logx_announcements We will soon open up the LogX platform for 100 beta users. These 100 beta users will get exclusive benefits (like NFTs, large airdrops, etc.). Join the channel to know when we start inviting.

👍6

7 Jun 2023, 17:28 UTC≈3,780 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Announcing our "LogX 🪵 | Announcements" telegram channel: https://t.me/logx_announcements Hi everyone - as you all know, we at Flint Labs have been silently building for the past few months after sunsetting our Flint Money app. In the recent twitter space, we spoke about our new direction, and have also summarised the conversation in the following blog: https://medium.com/@flintlabs/flint-labs-next-chapter-7e56a87f4

👍6

16 May 2023, 14:10 UTC≈3,420 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Hello everyone - we are about to start in a few minutes! Please do join and interact with us: https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1BdGYyAPzgQGX

👍3

14 May 2023, 16:25 UTC≈3,220 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Hello everyone - hope you all have been doing great. Flint Labs has been on an incredible journey, and we have recently summarised our story in a detailed blog post. We are excited to share the blog with you, which captures our growth, experiences, and the next phase of Flint Labs: https://flintlabs.medium.com/the-evolution-of-flint-labs-2978ffa9f1a4 On Tuesday (May 16) 8 PM Indian Time, we're hosting a Twitter Spa

👍61

25 Mar 2023, 14:04 UTC≈3,520 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

GM everyone, Are you tired of the hassle of paying gas fees in just one token? Say hello to GasPay ⛽️🚫 - another feather in the suite of products Flint offers, it is a simple browser extension that makes your web3 experience seamless by allowing you to pay gas fees in any token. With GasPay, you can stay connected to your favorite dApps and use your existing wallet, all while supercharging the experience of the exi

👍14

14 Jan 2023, 13:04 UTC≈4,410 views32 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Hello people - hope you are having some fun in this new found BTC price movement :) we are exploring new things to add to our product suite for you, and are looking for your opinions as well. You just have to select 1 choice on this question: https://forms.gle/vzAQM2ndTiRvrc6C6 It is a single question form. Should not take more than 30 seconds :) Thanks.

👍32

12 Jan 2023, 16:04 UTC≈3,720 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Hey everyone, I am Anshu this side, co founder at Flint. Is anyone here actively using uniswap (like used it once in the last week)? If yes, could you react to this message or reply below. We are working on something for which me and my team wants to ask a few questions. Would be really helpful if anyone could take out a few minutes. Thanks! You can reply to this in the comments and I (or someone I confirm) will r

👍23👏2

23 Dec 2022, 10:13 UTC≈3,620 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Have you moved your crypto to self custody from centralised exchanges?

  1. Yes, because of the recent negative news42%
  2. Yes, I already used to do this before the crash18%
  3. No, I trust my exchange19%
  4. I have sold all my crypto11%
  5. No, I did not think much about it9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Nov 2022, 06:14 UTC≈3,690 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🔥Time to dive in deeper. We have Trilegal Law also joining our spaces today. 🎙Tune in to our twitter spaces Today November 30th (15:30 UTC / 11:30 EST / 17:30 EET / 21:00 IST) ⏰ Set Reminder: https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1OdKrzQEWOnKX

🔥4

29 Nov 2022, 07:37 UTC≈2,720 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✨Let's explore how things are shaping up for the new reality of the co-existence of Crypto & Trad Fi ⚡️Along with BINOCS & ANQ Finance 🎙Tune in to our twitter spaces Tomorrow November 30th (15:30 UTC / 11:30 EST / 17:30 EET / 21:00 IST) ⏰ Set Reminder: https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1OdKrzQEWOnKX

👍7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Flintdotmoney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Dec 2022, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Poll175 voters

Have you moved your crypto to self custody from centralised exchanges?

  1. Yes, because of the recent negative news42%
  2. Yes, I already used to do this before the crash18%
  3. No, I trust my exchange19%
  4. I have sold all my crypto11%
  5. No, I did not think much about it9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2022 to 3 July 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Flint” (@Flintdotmoney), 7,534 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Flintdotmoney.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.