Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𓈒ֵ۫ ❤️ 𝔉lᧉ𑂘s𐐼ׄ ℱl𝕠𝐨d +754

Channel

𓈒ֵ۫ ❤️ 𝔉lᧉ𑂘s𐐼ׄ ℱl𝕠𝐨d +754

@FlessaFlood

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

122subscribers

+39 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004371718148
TypeChannel
Usernames@EnfrayseFlood @FlessaFlood
DescriptionНачало : 21.09.26 Конец : никада Флуд по к-поп и дорамам (без скз) Влд : @marjeluv Оформление : @camiorras
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 5 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held10
On Telegramt.me/FlessaFlood

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

79122100.510 August 2026 — 83 subscribers10 August 2026 — 83 subscribers10 August 2026 — 85 subscribers17 August 2026 — 111 subscribers25 August 2026 — 93 subscribers1 September 2026 — 86 subscribers10 September 2026 — 81 subscribers17 September 2026 — 79 subscribers27 September 2026 — 122 subscribers27 September 2026 — 122 subscribers10 August 202627 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 48 days, net +39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73–128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 21:22122no change
27 Sept 2026, 20:47122+43
17 Sept 2026, 06:0179-2
10 Sept 2026, 04:0081-5
1 Sept 2026, 02:3386-7
25 Aug 2026, 09:4793-18
17 Aug 2026, 13:04111+26
10 Aug 2026, 12:4885+2
10 Aug 2026, 10:4583no change
10 Aug 2026, 10:3183first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
66.2%
avg views ÷ 122 subscribers
Avg views / post
80.7
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held38 (5 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total1,534
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
24
Videos
3
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

201 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52042241948244128852311.4%
custom 52019717121109271202110.4%
custom 5202101480252808344199.45%
custom 5206221865718162248199.45%
custom 5202145417768248935178.46%
custom 5017144460316772055167.96%
custom 5019265667354854525157.46%
custom 5215536086415077284157.46%
custom 5199881274218553894146.97%
custom 5204412125413416114104.98%
custom 5213269378769907275104.98%
custom 5215655134318587386104.98%
custom 520406247212584980983.98%
custom 532581731742938171820.995%
custom 536403278108298197020.995%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 37 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FlessaFlood. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 16:45 UTC115 views1 reactionsread 27 September 2026

я считаю стоит добить)

custom 53640327810829819701

21 Sept 2026, 16:44 UTC111 viewsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @Ch1piFloodPhoto

у нас снова прошла чистка 🥶🥶 што за позор Итоги: Преды: Сонхва (☠️.) Кёнмин/Чимин Иан Шухуа Луи/Джейк Гехун/Сынмин Стелла Чанбин Вонён/Рами (☠️.) Юнхо Баны: Интак Чонвон Казуха позорище🤬🤬 Топ 3 за неделю: С влд: Кейджу/Тайра - 13 272 Руи/Тэмин - 2 818 Карина - 2 441 Без влд: Руи/Тэмин - 2 818 Карина - 2 441 Цзыюй - 1 308 всего за неделю :: 33 230 #ℂhRp

21 Sept 2026, 16:44 UTC56 viewsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @mayvooffVideo

⊹ ̣̣ ֺ 𝖁𝘪𝕕𝖾𝟎 ⭒ ֹ ⸝⸝ ‌ ׅ ֯ ㅤִ ᩫᰰ⁝𝕮𝗈𝑙𝑙𝙖b 𝕨it𝐡 — @DAYM5 ℭ𝕣 : 𝒮𝗮𝘤u𝕣𝐚 𝅬ߪ ࣭ 𝓵𝓸𝓸𝓴 𝓲𝓷 𝓣𝓲𝓴𝓣𝓸𝓴 ﹙ ☕️ ﹚ #myvRP

21 Sept 2026, 16:44 UTC60 viewsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @famousfloodinffo

ищем админов и союзы #fmrp

21 Sept 2026, 16:43 UTC54 viewsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @regenvalflood

#Yoongi давайте двое ток нужееееееееее #rgrp #сзрп

21 Sept 2026, 16:43 UTC51 viewsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @regenvalflood

#Yoongi ищем допов 5:5-10:10 Писать: @NevelYoongi (переходник) #сзрп #rgrp

21 Sept 2026, 15:12 UTC59 views1 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @editionfldPhoto

ᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟ ۪ 𑁁 ִ 🦋ʾ۫ׄ N𝕖w 𝖀nı𝐨n 「」 ❞ ֔ ༢⎯꯭ 𝟐𝟏.𝟎𝟗.𝟐𝟔 𝕐o𝕦 & m𝕖 〔 🐱〕 🎀``.. ∕∕ Р⍺ֹды с𝐨юзყ ⌣ ֥ ֲ֤ ֺ֬ ☁️

custom 53640327810829819701

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @FlessaFlood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𓈒ֵ۫ ❤️ 𝔉lᧉ𑂘s𐐼ׄ ℱl𝕠𝐨d +754” (@FlessaFlood), 122 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FlessaFlood.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.