Channel
@FlacheErdeBibel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,508subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001253339120 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FlacheErdeBibel |
| Created | 20 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FlacheErdeBibel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 10,508 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 10,511 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 10,506 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 10,507 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:52 | 10,512 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 10,513 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 10,512 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 10,517 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 10,518 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 10,518 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,576 reactions across 19 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 624 | 39.6% | |
| ❤ | 235 | 14.9% | |
| 👍 | 228 | 14.5% | |
| 💯 | 194 | 12.3% | |
| 😁 | 114 | 7.23% | |
| 👏 | 27 | 1.71% | |
| 🙈 | 21 | 1.33% | |
| 🤯 | 20 | 1.27% | |
| ⚡ | 13 | 0.825% | |
| 🏆 | 12 | 0.761% | |
| 😢 | 12 | 0.761% | |
| 🙏 | 12 | 0.761% | |
| 😎 | 11 | 0.698% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 0.635% | |
| 🆒 | 6 | 0.381% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 0.381% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 0.317% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.317% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.254% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.19% | |
| 5 further kinds | 14 | 0.888% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,576reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2025 to 23 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇸 The Actornauts forgot about the delay 🤣 🇩🇪 Die Actornauten haben die Verzögerung vergessen 🤣 🇫🇷 Les actornautes ont oublié le délai 🤣 🇪🇸 Los actornautas olvidaron el retraso 🤣 🇮🇹 Gli actornauti si sono dimenticati del ritardo 🤣 🇷🇺 Актёронавты забыли про задержку 🤣 🇵🇹 Os actornautas esqueceram do atraso 🤣 🇮🇩 Para actornaut lupa tentang delay 🤣 @FlacheErdeBibel
😁32❤7🤩5👍3👏1
Fly me to the moon (2024) “As NASA prepares for the historic Apollo 11 mission, Kelly suggests broadcasting the moon landing using a television camera on the Lunar Excursion Module (LEM), a proposal Cole dismisses as impractical. However, Moe secretly endorses the idea and reveals an additional, shadowy directive to Kelly: she must prepare a fake moon landing to be aired if the real mission fails, a project codename…
👍20❤12😁8🤣3🤯3🐳2👾2🌚1
This is how your grandparents got fooled 🥹. Don't let it pass to the next generation. Just stop it 🛑 ✋️ 🙅♂️
🤣100🏆6❤3🔥2🐳1
🇺🇸 Schematic representation of the Earth according to the Bible 🇩🇪 Schematische Darstellung der Erde laut der Bibel 🇫🇷 Représentation schématique de la Terre selon la Bible 🇪🇸 Representación esquemática de la Tierra según la Biblia 🇮🇹 Rappresentazione schematica della Terra secondo la Bibbia 🇷🇺 Схематическое изображение Земли согласно Библии 🇵🇹 Representação esquemática da Terra segundo a Bíblia @FlacheErdeBibel
👍36❤17🙈3👏1👾1
𝐆𝐨𝐝’𝐬 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐝 𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐋𝐖𝐀𝐘𝐒 𝐅𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐞: Jeremiah 42:5, Revelation 3:14, Revelation 19:11, Revelation 21:5, Revelation 22:6 @FlacheErdeBibel
👍14❤13
The following notes are a response to those who deny that a physical "firmament/dome" structure is being stretched above our heads. Genesis 1:6-8 - With understanding the properties of water, it requires a physically hardened substance to keep it contained. Thus, a dome/firmament is not only logic, but is within the proper context of scripture. Job 26:7 - From the "north" is being "stretched" over what empty place?…
❤21👍16👏1
200+ Flat Earth Bible Verses 🇺🇸 Over 200 Bible verses prove the Flat Earth. A collection of Bible passages about our geocentric, stationary, and flat Earth. Luke 24:45 Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐂𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐁𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐮𝐧: Genesis 1:1-19 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞, 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠: Genesis 2:1 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐌𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞…
❤30🙏11👍1
🇺🇸 “We’re going to the Moon”? The facial expressions say it all. 🇩🇪 „Wir fliegen zum Mond“? Die Gesichtsausdrücke sagen alles. 😂 🇫🇷 « On va aller sur la Lune » ? Les expressions du visage disent tout. 😂 🇪🇸 ¿“Vamos a la Luna”? Las expresiones faciales lo dicen todo. 🇮🇹 «Andiamo sulla Luna»? Le espressioni del viso dicono tutto. 🇷🇺 «Мы летим на Луну»? Выражения лиц говорят сами за себя. 😂 🇵🇹 “Vamos para a Lua”? As expr…
🤣60❤7😁6👍5💯2🙊2
🇺🇸 The new 2025 film Bugonia (starring Emma Stone) has included flat-Earth cosmology in a very interesting and subversive way. 🇩🇪 Der neue Film Bugonia (2025) mit Emma Stone hat die flache-Erde-Kosmologie auf eine sehr interessante und subversive Weise eingebaut. 🇫🇷 Le nouveau film Bugonia (2025), avec Emma Stone, a intégré la cosmologie de la Terre plate d’une manière très intéressante et subversive. 🇪🇸 La nueva …
👍31❤12👀6🤣3😎3❤🔥1🙈1🆒1
🇺🇸 Why a 24-hour sun in Antarctica does not disprove the flat Earth but is consistent with the model. 🇩🇪 Warum eine 24-Stunden-Sonne in der Antarktis nicht die flache Erde widerlegt, sondern mit dem Modell im Einklang ist. 🇫🇷 Pourquoi un soleil de 24 heures en Antarctique ne réfute pas la Terre plate, mais est en accord avec le modèle. 🇪🇸 Por qué un sol de 24 horas en la Antártida no refuta la Tierra plana, sino que …
👏24❤13🤣4⚡3🏆2🕊2🥰2🐳1
🇺🇸 Wow… We are going to the moon, can you believe it? Uh… We came back from the moon, can you believe it? 🇩🇪Wow… Wir fliegen zum Mond, kannst du das glauben? Äh… Wir sind vom Mond zurückgekommen, kannst du das glauben? 🇫🇷 Wow… Nous allons sur la Lune, tu peux y croire ? Euh… Nous sommes revenus de la Lune, tu peux y croire ? 🇪🇸Wow… Vamos a la Luna, ¿puedes creerlo? Eh… Volvimos de la Luna, ¿puedes creerlo? 🇮🇹Wow……
🤣69❤12🎉3🌚2⚡1🙈1🆒1
Why have all this if we allegedly have consistent orbiting sattelite coverage?
💯33❤17👍9👀2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @FlacheErdeBibel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 550,806 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Flat Earth Germany 🇩🇪” (@FlacheErdeBibel), 10,508 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FlacheErdeBibel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.