Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

5-minute English Vocabulary

@FiveMinEngVocab

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,586subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001380096333
TypeChannel
Username@FiveMinEngVocab
Description1 тест на день. 1 відео-опис довжиною 1 хвилина Вчи слова активно Наш другий канал по граматиці - @fiveminenggra Альона Даль. Мій Інстаграм: https://www.instagram.com/aliona.dal/ З усіх питань @alionadal
Created14 April 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FiveMinEngVocab

Growth

12,58512,59312,5896 August 2026 — 12,593 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,591 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,593 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,591 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,586 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,587 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,585 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,586 subscribers12,5866 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,584–12,594 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:2512,586+1
12 Aug 2026, 00:0812,585-2
10 Aug 2026, 22:5112,587+1
9 Aug 2026, 19:3312,586-5
8 Aug 2026, 16:1212,591-2
7 Aug 2026, 15:1412,593+2
6 Aug 2026, 18:1012,591-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:1512,593first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.34%
avg views ÷ 12,586 subscribers
Avg views / post
923
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
33
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held33 (29 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total30,474
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
13
Videos
1
Links
88

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC519 viewsread 13 August 2026
Poll

2357. The economy needs more …. .

  1. investigation15%
  2. investment76%
  3. insurance3%
  4. encouragement6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC672 viewsread 13 August 2026
Poll

2356. Under no …. will I allow such a thing.

  1. situation7%
  2. situations3%
  3. circumstance14%
  4. circumstances77%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC748 viewsread 13 August 2026
Poll

2355. The children were …. so much fun, I hated to call them inside.

  1. doing5%
  2. making14%
  3. having73%
  4. being9%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC803 viewsread 13 August 2026
Poll

2354. They announced the …. of the flight this morning.

  1. abolition3%
  2. resignation9%
  3. cancellation85%
  4. communication2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC844 viewsread 13 August 2026
Poll

2353. United were knocked out of the ... in the first round.

  1. situation5%
  2. production2%
  3. competition83%
  4. organisation10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC913 viewsread 13 August 2026
Poll

2352. Several serious .... have been made against him by the police.

  1. investigations31%
  2. suggestions7%
  3. accusations54%
  4. demonstrations8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @FiveMinEngVocab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz279 voters

2357. The economy needs more …. .

  1. investigation15%
  2. investment76%
  3. insurance3%
  4. encouragement6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz317 voters

2356. Under no …. will I allow such a thing.

  1. situation7%
  2. situations3%
  3. circumstance14%
  4. circumstances77%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz346 voters

2355. The children were …. so much fun, I hated to call them inside.

  1. doing5%
  2. making14%
  3. having73%
  4. being9%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz361 voters

2354. They announced the …. of the flight this morning.

  1. abolition3%
  2. resignation9%
  3. cancellation85%
  4. communication2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz366 voters

2353. United were knocked out of the ... in the first round.

  1. situation5%
  2. production2%
  3. competition83%
  4. organisation10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz379 voters

2352. Several serious .... have been made against him by the police.

  1. investigations31%
  2. suggestions7%
  3. accusations54%
  4. demonstrations8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“5-minute English Vocabulary” (@FiveMinEngVocab), 12,586 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FiveMinEngVocab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.