Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Fired Lawyer

@FiredLawyer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,959subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001142813301
TypeChannel
Username@FiredLawyer
Created23 May 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FiredLawyer

Growth

1,9591,9681,963.56 August 2026 — 1,968 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,968 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,960 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,959 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,958–1,969 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 07:121,959-1
12 Aug 2026, 00:121,960-8
6 Aug 2026, 06:321,968no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:201,968first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 29 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
280.8%
avg views ÷ 1,959 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,500
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.545%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held15 (29 October 202525 July 2026)
Views total5,500
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

824 reactions across 15 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁25030.3%
🔥10012.1%
💯9311.3%
👍809.71%
💔354.25%
😢334.00%
313.76%
🤡313.76%
❤‍🔥202.43%
🌚172.06%
🙏172.06%
🤬172.06%
🤣141.70%
🎉131.58%
🤮111.33%
🤝91.09%
🕊70.85%
🍾60.728%
👏60.728%
💩60.728%
12 further kinds283.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 824reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FiredLawyer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 October 2025 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC≈5,500 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Heart over mind. Не мог молчать. Задержали Романа Мельниченко. Когда-нибудь право и справедливость восторжествуют. Дай бог, соберемся, чтобы отпраздновать. https://t.me/initiative2018/5263

🤬15❤‍🔥7🕊7👍1

7 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC≈1,850 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Прошла вечность с момента написания цитируемого поста. Пришло время сделать апдейт. Я сегодня скормил Клоду тест для соискателей: сорок хитрых авторских вопросов от наших лучших умов. 15 — в форме анкеты, соискатель должен выбрать лишь один правильный ответ; 25 — «на подумать», с местом для ответа «от руки». Claude Sonnet 5.0 — не самая топовая версия, — ни разу не ошибся, что, если сравнивать с настоящими соискате

🌚17👍12💯12🤡74🤔3👾21

9 Jun 2026, 17:55 UTC≈2,020 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ПМЮФ опубликовал программу. Какое время, такое и право.

😢21🤮9🔥6👎2🤷‍♂2👍1🤡1😁1

5 Jun 2026, 14:55 UTC≈1,840 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вверх тормашками Если бы отменили, вот бы все удивились! А так — скажут, что очевидно же было, что без шансов. Все поменялось местами. Черное и белое. Правда и ложь. Закон и беззаконие. И это ненормально. https://t.me/tayskayaGramota/2079

💯12🥴42😡1

5 Jun 2026, 07:29 UTC≈1,420 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня апелляция по делу «адвокатов Бартолиус». Знаковому делу — на кону, не побоюсь этого слова, независимость адвокатуры. И ее место в архитектуре нашего государства и общества. Подробности. Контекст.

🙏11❤‍🔥5🤝2😁21😈1

31 May 2026, 08:15 UTC≈1,410 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

С Днём адвокатуры, коллеги! Работайте, не сдавайтесь! ✊

❤‍🔥8🤝7🔥4🙏1

31 May 2026, 08:15 UTC≈1,770 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хочется поздравить адвокатов, не знаю как. Очень тяжелая и достойная работа, часто неблагодарная. В текущей ситуации еще и опасная. Полностью комикс тут.

👍17😢8🙏5😁3

27 Apr 2026, 08:40 UTC≈1,970 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Избранные цитаты: 1. Когда смотришь на эту ситуацию, видишь два лагеря — и оба знают, что между ними есть напряжение. Адвокаты слышат слово «монополия» и думают: «Наконец-то!». Юристы без статуса слышат то же слово и думают: «Нас захватывают и вытесняют!» Если поместить чёрных и рыжих муравьев в одну банку, то эти насекомые, относящиеся к одному семейству, не будут сражаться друг с другом, пока эту банку не потряст

🔥136💯3👍2

10 Apr 2026, 16:47 UTC≈1,760 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну что, мои дорогие любители common law. Пришло ваше время в России! Ситуативное право. Без базы, без традиций. В полете и в моменте. В топку кодексы и всякие там Касы. Разрешено, что не запрещено — и тому подобный отсталый бред теперь в прошлом! Теперь каждый может добиться правосудия в России с большей вероятностью, чем нигде! Подпись: Краснов И.В. Юлий Тай, Алексей Басистов, Дмитрий Проводин лишены статуса адво

💔35💯11🍾3👍3🙈3🔥2🤬2💩1

2 Feb 2026, 12:05 UTC≈2,390 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Свежие слухи. Как-то раз Оскар Уальд высказывался о сплетнях по поводу адвокатской монополии устами лорда Генри: Быть неинтересным очень плохо, потому что о тебе никто не говорит. Не расслабляемся, продолжаем любопытствовать.

😁27🔥10👍41👏1

19 Jan 2026, 15:11 UTC≈3,470 views92 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему в юрфирмах одни юристы — алкоголики, другие — трудоголики, третьи — спортсмены, четвертые —экстремалы? Давайте разберемся с точки зрения этологии и нейробиологии. Юристы работают с чужим ужасом и страхом. Ужас, что произошло, и страх, во что это может вылиться. Работа юриста — взять это на себя по доверенности, присовокупив к своей тревожности за собственную компетентность, боязнь не добиться в деле успеха и

😁38🔥22💯13👍54🍾3😢3👎1

18 Dec 2025, 17:34 UTC≈2,720 views29 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

На законе вышли рекомендации, как есть 💩 Спойлер: маленькими ложками. Можно так дойти и до того, что взятки надо давать, чтобы формировать хорошую судебную практику!

💯12🤯4😁42🥰2👍1👎1💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @FiredLawyer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 187,931 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fired Lawyer” (@FiredLawyer), 1,959 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FiredLawyer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.