Channel
@Filmosophy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,508subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001077078224 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Filmosophy |
| Created | 29 January 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Filmosophy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 2,508 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 2,512 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 2,513 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 2,513 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 29 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
35 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 57.1% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 11.4% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 5.71% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2025 to 6 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
به یاد بلا تار کلیپِ تفسیری فیلموسوفی از فیلم «اسب تورین» آخرین شاهکارِ بلا تار (که پیشتر در محفلِ فیلموسوفها به نمایش درآمده بود) متن و صدا از نوید گرگین سال ۱۳۹۶ 📽 @filmosophy
❤8👎1
. مجموعه کتابهای دهگانۀ «عشق در سینما» در قالب یک کتاب منتشر شد... این کتاب، پیش از این ابتدا طی مجموعهای دهگانه تحت عنوان «عشق در سینما» انتشار یافت. پساز گذر چند سال بر آن شدیم تا ده کتاب کوچک را در یک مجلد گرد آوریم. «عمل جنسی را، نه بهدلایل اخلاقی بلکه بهعلل زیباشناختیِ ناب، نباید روی پرده نشان داد. و سینما چه راهی برای بازنمایی عشق (منظور «عشق افلاطونی» یا «عشق منزّه» نیست) جز نمایش/بازنمایی عمل جنسی/…
❤3
. حلقه هنر فلانور «سینما و تاریخ اندیشه» •از افلاطون تا رانسیر •مدرسین: صالح نجفی، مازیار اسلامی •یکشنبهها ساعت ۱۸ الی ۲۰ •شرکت در این دوره به صورت حضوری و آنلاین امکانپذیر میباشد. •برای اطلاعات بیشتر و ثبتنام دوره، به شمارهی ۰۹۳۵۴۸۶۸۷۰۸ در تلگرام و یا دایرکت اینستاگرام پیام دهید. Instagram: flanuerscircle Telegram: @flanuersartcircle
❤1
مدرسه تخصصی فیلمنامهنویسی فلانور «نوشتن با چشمِ باز» •فعال کردن کارکرد نقدر در فیلمنامهنویسی • مدرس: کیانوش اخباری • ترم دوم • • پنجشنبهها ساعت ۱۴ الی ۱۶ • شروع دوره، هفته سوم مردادماه • هنرجویان خارج از تهران، میتوانند در این دوره به صورت آنلاین شرکت کنند. برای اطلاعات بیشتر و ثبت نام دوره، به شمارهی ۰۹۳۵۴۸۶۸۷۰۸ در تلگرام و یا در دایرکت اینستاگرام پیام دهید. Instagram: flanuerscircle Telegram: @flanuer…
😢1
. منتشر شد ... — «نظریهٔ سیاسی و فیلم: از آدورنو تا ژیژک» نظریههای سیاسی اغلب پیوند نزدیکی با تأثیرات بصری و نیروی اقناعی تصاویر داشتهاند. این پیوند، راهبردهای کارآمدی برای نقد سیاسی، نهتنها در عرصهٔ سینما بلکه در سایر زمینهها نیز ارائه کرده است. ازاینرو، نظریهٔ سیاسی و نظریهٔ فیلم به شکل متقابل و دوسویه از یکدیگر سود بردهاند. کتاب «نظریهٔ سیاسی و فیلم: از آدورنو تا ژیژک» در پی آن است که سهمی در بحثهای معاصر …
❤4👏1😢1
. فیلم «The Brown Bunny» (خرگوش قهوهای، ۲۰۰۳) به کارگردانی وینسنت گالو (Vincent Gallo) است. این فیلم مستقل آمریکایی بهجهت محتوای جنجالی و سبک رواییاش شهرت و جنجال بسیاری بهپا کرد. داستان دربارهٔ موتورسواری حرفهای است که سفری جادهای از ساحل شرقی بهسمت لسآنجلس آغاز میکند. در طول سفر، او با زنان مختلفی برخورد میکند اما همهچیز حولمحور خاطره و اندوهی از معشوق سابقش میگردد. فیلم نمایشیست از «تنهایی، اندوه، …
❤2👎2👍1
🔴 گفتگو با نوید گرگین دربارهی جنگ فلسفی و فلسفهی جنگ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlDGWEiY6e8
👎4👍3👏1
. چرا عینک دودی اینقدر برای سینما جذابیت دارد؟ دلایل واضحی وجود دارد که به پردهپوشی، پنهانکاری، مرموزنمایی و مد مربوط میشود. اما مقیاس نیز یکی از اجزای اساسی فیلم است. وقتی نمایی درشت از چهرهای با عینک دودی طولانی میشود، غالباً چیزی بیتناسب در تصویر هست که با وجود این، دقیقاً به علت ناهمخوانیاش (عینک درشت و چهرۀ ریز)، میل زیباشناختی تماشاگر را ارضاء میکند. ادری هپبورن بارها و بارها این نکته را به اثبات رساند…
❤2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Filmosophy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 345,228 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Filmosophy | فیلموسوفی” (@Filmosophy), 2,508 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Filmosophy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.