Channel
@FightResearch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,921subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001462962449 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FightResearch |
| Created | 3 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FightResearch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 3,921 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 3,925 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:42 | 3,928 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 3,928 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
蔡玉玲夥資深傳媒人雷子樂創辦網媒《集誌社》：新聞的專業需要承傳 香港人以後睇新聞又多一個選擇！新媒體《集誌社》於今日（19日）發表創刊辭，指會以專業和公正態度，在地報道香港的人和事，監察權貴、深入求真，並在資訊碎片化的新時代，承傳新聞專業。《集誌社》每周會發表深度報道、跟進公眾關心的議題及剖析時事重點，並以Podcast頻道「集誌背後」及影像等方式提供新聞內容，讀者可以經Patreon或PayPal訂閱支持。 《集誌社》由曾製作元朗721專題報道而被起訴的港台前編導蔡玉玲，和曾在《蘋果日報》、《香港01》等工作的資深傳媒人雷子樂聯合創辦，員工陣容亦包括年輕的傳媒工作者。 https://channelchk.com/a/7464 #集誌社 #蔡玉玲 #雷子樂 #Channelchk 📣 請訂閱作戰研究院 Telegram Channel ➼ @FightResearch 戰術研究 | 抗爭資訊 | 時局分析 | 評論 …
傳媒人再搞新媒體，請支持 棱角 The Points https://www.facebook.com/ThePoints.Global/ The Points Global https://www.youtube.com/@thepointsglobal 📣 請訂閱作戰研究院 Telegram Channel ➼ @FightResearch 戰術研究 | 抗爭資訊 | 時局分析 | 評論 | 趣事
【除夕獅子山 釋放政治犯 梁健輝遺言燈箱】 除夕晚上，有香港人到獅子山頂舉起「FREE HK POLITICAL PRISONERS」燈牌倒數，要求釋放政治犯。期間沙田方向有雷射筆光速射上獅子山頂。有參加者表示雖然限制令已被取消，但相信2023年的香港政府仍然不會批準舉行任何示威遊行，今年的新年願望是希望所有政治犯可於年內獲釋。亦有山友慨嘆今晚是最後在香港的除夕夜，因家中有幼兒，不久的將來將會舉家移民外國，故專程到獅子山上作最後一次的倒數。 一行山者將2021年7月1日自殺身亡的梁健輝最後遺言製作成燈牌，掛在獅子山頂上，「當生命到最後，你可能會問吓自己：『之前做嘅事會唔會令你自豪？世界因為你變好咗定變壞咗？自由咗定專制咗？』。梁健輝RIP。 *影片及照片由一名手持白紙、操流利普通話的行山者提供 *攝於黃昏後30分鐘內 https://t.me/boomheadhk 😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼 patreon同…
佳節當前，記掛着那些身陷囹圄和正在等待判刑的朋友。以下是一個小整合，若有遺留歡迎指正。祝願牆內的每一位和他們的家人平安、溫暖，也祝一直以來支持香港記者的您們，聖誕快樂、新年進步。 【在囚人士支援】 候鳥 Waiting Bird 透過代辦買賣在囚物資所得的資源，進行在囚支援工作，設立熱線服務，為有需要朋友提供適切的服務和跟進 www.facebook.com/waitingbirdhk 燕子生命 設立自助物資中心支援在囚人士 www.swallowlife.org/ 細葉榕人道支援基金 Banyan Tree Aid 提供在囚資訊、為在囚人士家屬提供經濟支持及心理人道援助 www.facebook.com/banyantreeaid 社工 劉家棟 在囚支援、創立「社會運動案件支援服務實習計劃」 https://www.facebook.com/katungsw 一釋尚存｜𝟏 𝐑𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐝 提供在囚資訊 www.f…
Hk9egg店長活動 由小時看到反高鐵，不明白地去觀察，心中有疑問為何有人反對港共政府興建高鐵，當中的關鍵字「沉降、超支、播毒」全部成真，再由一地兩檢到其後反國教，佔領中環、魚蛋及反送中，亦證明中國對香港只有一面倒壞處。 當中許多所謂香港人提出港英政府「玫瑰園計劃」亦有以上問題，但港英政府是以香港發展為基礎並不是配合中國發展而開發，由此可以看出兩個政府高下立見，但香港人當時並不明白並認為港英政府是蓄意揮霍香港財政儲備，時至今日「玫瑰園計劃」並沒有陰乾香港財政並至今仍為香港人所使用，如果沒有該計劃，今天仍使用舊啟德機場或用深圳某機場，結果不言而喻。 感謝 @hk9cake 同 @hk9egg 。係呢個困難時候接納我做店長，當係19年被捕時只有26歲，岩岩過完生日就係30歲係結案陳詞同等待裁決嘅日子，每一日都係度等緊嘅時候，公事上亦比較繁忙，公司每日業務都有增長oversea亦開始發展。 作為一個長子，…
【26歲的你，未來見】 訂閱《獄中書簡》持續支持之鋒 👉 bit.ly/joshuawonghk admin：不經不覺已兩年無法與之鋒同慶生日，但一班朋友依然會有搞作，希望獄中的他能有一點歡笑和溫暖。最近探訪時，之鋒聊到高達動畫的新作，令人想到充滿鬥志與樂觀的面容背後，其實他內心仍然年少。期待在不遠的未來，每一位失去自由的手足都能得以歡慶，就讓我們繼續關注與守望。 大家的祝福我們都會寄入予之鋒閱讀，亦歡迎大家繼續寫信和訂閱之鋒的獄中隨筆，給他最有力的鼓舞 👉 bit.ly/joshuawonghk ──────────────── ✉️ 九龍中央郵政局郵政信箱73962號(信封毋須註明姓名) 🖊 書信需經院所消毒，請避免用易化墨水筆書寫 黃之鋒 📣 請訂閱作戰研究院 Telegram Channel ➼ @FightResearch 戰術研究 | 抗爭資訊 | 時局分析 | 評論 | 趣事
星期三-四(12-13/10)紙片人係9cake做店長 📍 9cake(葵芳) 葵芳葵富路7號葵涌廣場2樓2010號舖 星期六(22/10)有嚟緊考DSE去無名氏做店長 📍油麻地仁俊大廈1號地舖 =分隔線= @hker_ic101 光陰似箭、日月如梭，轉眼間三年已經過去。 回想當初2019年嘅時候，我仲係一個對呢個世界充滿熱血、自命不凡嘅青少年，喺社運爆發之前一兩個月我仲考緊DSE，喺通識科試卷上面奮筆疾書批評時事、談論政策，交卷嗰陣充滿自豪、甚至覺得自己嘅答案俾政府已經實行嘅政策做得更加好，完全冇諗過其實呢個世界有能力嘅人真係好多好多、又點到我嚟懷才不遇呢？ 呢個世界係充滿複雜嘅因素，現實世界唔係安徒生裏面嘅童話故事，「政治」呢兩個字有幾黑暗其實係嗰陣我係完全冇任何認知，直到社運將虛假嘅繁華撕破。 修讀歷史、文學嘅我又真係一個充滿書生氣息嘅廢青，作為一個身高175、但係體重從來冇超過55 kg嘅弱雞，小弟真係手無縛…
需要支持吓法庭線，入去點擊訂閱，比like，留言，係佢哋收入來源 👉 https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYRpTuLTvC7S6zfATKNfDXw/featured 📣 請訂閱作戰研究院 Telegram Channel ➼ @FightResearch 戰術研究 | 抗爭資訊 | 時局分析 | 評論 | 趣事
手足店整合。請大家廣傳，有需要優先考慮惠顧！🙏🏻🙏🏻 https://t.me/LinkSupportHK/124 📣 請訂閱作戰研究院 Telegram Channel ➼ @FightResearch 戰術研究 | 抗爭資訊 | 時局分析 | 評論 | 趣事
《眾聲號》時隔半年回歸 重新出發延續紀錄精神 🙏💪 https://bit.ly/3oK8M72 📣 請訂閱作戰研究院 Telegram Channel ➼ @FightResearch 戰術研究 | 抗爭資訊 | 時局分析 | 評論 | 趣事
我們沒有結局──專訪《日常運動》作者梁莉姿：記住那些原初的驚嚇、恐懼、憤怒，都曾存在過 https://bit.ly/3Ot1TSf 📣 請訂閱作戰研究院 Telegram Channel ➼ @FightResearch 戰術研究 | 抗爭資訊 | 時局分析 | 評論 | 趣事
香港人可以心痛，但不能被打沉。 書生不想 po 所謂「滿臉憔悴」的健仔，那是政權給我們看的健仔，而不是我所認識的健仔。 我用返《德國之聲》當年的訪問截圖，健仔係片中講左句：「我相信只要堅持下來，我們努力一點，都會有未來和希望」。只要香港人繼續同行，支持同聲援健仔，健仔終於都會變返果個熱愛做運動的健仔。 我永遠都唔會唔記得，2019 年 10 月 1 日，有顆子彈，不只射穿了一個年輕人，還射穿了香港人的心。 📣 請訂閱作戰研究院 Telegram Channel ➼ @FightResearch 戰術研究 | 抗爭資訊 | 時局分析 | 評論 | 趣事
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @FightResearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,030,298 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@FightResearch named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“作戰研究院” (@FightResearch), 3,921 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FightResearch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.