Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,515–8,582 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 14:19
8,523
-3
1 Nov 2026, 11:40
8,526
-2
29 Oct 2026, 14:58
8,528
-6
26 Oct 2026, 13:56
8,534
-3
23 Oct 2026, 21:20
8,537
-3
21 Oct 2026, 05:41
8,540
-2
18 Oct 2026, 11:49
8,542
+1
15 Oct 2026, 03:05
8,541
-4
11 Oct 2026, 17:15
8,545
-6
4 Oct 2026, 23:17
8,551
+3
25 Sept 2026, 13:01
8,548
-10
17 Sept 2026, 07:38
8,558
-5
13 Sept 2026, 02:19
8,563
-2
9 Sept 2026, 08:37
8,565
-1
4 Sept 2026, 00:15
8,566
-1
31 Aug 2026, 04:35
8,567
-3
27 Aug 2026, 18:16
8,570
-4
24 Aug 2026, 18:38
8,574
+4
17 Aug 2026, 22:02
8,570
+5
15 Aug 2026, 08:23
8,565
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.4%
avg views ÷ 8,523 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,330
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
54 (20 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
39,628
Reactions total
1,459
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 10:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,970
Videos
≈4
Links
≈87
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 37s
Average length
2m 19s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,410 reactions across 49 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
1,193
27.1%
🤣
1,072
24.3%
❤
1,000
22.7%
🔥
421
9.55%
👏
184
4.17%
❤🔥
106
2.40%
💔
78
1.77%
👍
58
1.32%
🥰
51
1.16%
🦄
33
0.748%
🏆
30
0.68%
😢
28
0.635%
💯
19
0.431%
😍
19
0.431%
🫡
16
0.363%
😭
14
0.317%
🗿
12
0.272%
🍌
11
0.249%
👌
9
0.204%
🤔
9
0.204%
13 further kinds
47
1.07%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,867 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (5.88%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
⚠️⚠️ ATTENTIONE: IMAGO IMPUDICA* ⚠️⚠️
Lo trascorso die ci habet lassiato il Magister della soffice lussuria, il Vate delle pellicule peccaminose, il Margravio della lascività: Colorito Ottone.
Esso fuit famoso registra di longometraggi como: Lo grimaldello, Amerinda spezia, A tal guisa agiscon omniae, Discola, Futile libito
Colle sue concupiscenti opre, l'Ottone habet cagionato cecità at multerrime generationi di…
Fel allo Lucca Manuscripti et Ludi anco quest'anno!
Ci trovate sovra le mura di Lucca, allo Baluardo San Paolino dal 28 Ottobre al 1 Novembre con:
- Mercanzia (Casacche, Gingilli et varie)
- Spettacoli
- Vendita delle Indulgenze*
- Gogna
- Scherma storica
Non mancate!
CREA LO TUO MOVIMENTO ERESIARCA ET AUTODENUNZIATI ALLA SANTA INQUISIZIONE!
Orsù sodali, l'Inquisizione necessita de pusillanimi da ardere e quanti eretici diavoli s'annidano tra voi?
Facetecelo gnoscer nelli commenti con una sacrissima autodafè
Entra a far parte dello nostro gruppo: Sodali di FEL
Niente candide poppe al vento, smisurato proso da fattrice o cadaverico incarnato, ma sulmente forti et villose monne teutoniche che ablano un idioma germanico-orientale
«Quando audisco la favella "protestante" metto mano all'acciarino»
😁51🔥23🤣11❤7🏆3
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @Feudalesimoeliberta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Feudalesimoeliberta named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ilya_stallone_artist named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ugolize @Ugolize · 21,229 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 September 2026
🧠 Sapiens³ @sapiens3 · 26,842 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 September 2026
Le foto del passato @lefotodelpassato · 60,526 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Feudalesimo e Libertà” (@Feudalesimoeliberta), 8,523 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Feudalesimoeliberta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.