Channel
πππππ¦.ππ’π’π
@Feels_Goodl
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
1,994subscribers
-54 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001955002133 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Feels_Goodl |
| Description | ΩΫΪΩΩΨͺΨ ΩΫΪ ΪΫΨ²Ψ Ψ§Ψ² ΩΫΪΪ©Ψ³Ψ Ψ¨ΨΉΫΨ― ΩΫΨ³Ψͺ! Instagram:feels goodlπ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Feels_Goodl |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 1,994 | no change |
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 1,994 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 2,001 | -5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 2,006 | -10 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 2,016 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:45 | 2,022 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 2,023 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 2,029 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 2,032 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 2,035 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 2,039 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 2,045 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 2,048 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured β we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Navarmaghze Β· 29,843
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 64 here β alongside 63 others β read 8 September 2026
@deldarofficial Β· 134,331
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 70 here β alongside 69 others β read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππππ¦.ππ’π’πβ (@Feels_Goodl), 1,994 subscribers as measured 21 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Feels_Goodl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.