🫶 It’s always great to receive your feedback! Message me: @sargis_official_bot YT 🔗 l FeedBack ❔ l PO 🔗 l Trading BOT 🤖

Channel
FEEDBACK CHANNEL
@Feedback_Traders
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
216subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002872888841 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Feedback_Traders |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Feedback_Traders |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 216 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 217 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 218 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 220 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 220 | first reading |
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
‼️ The biggest mistake is thinking you still have plenty of time. While you’re putting things off until tomorrow, next Monday, or next month, someone else is already gaining experience, making money, and moving closer to their goals. 📈 Success rarely comes to those who spend too much time thinking about it. It comes to those who take action, even when they have doubts. A year from now, you’ll either be grateful th…
📊 Trading changes the results of those who are willing to work on themselves Every review like this reminds me that we’re moving in the right direction 🔝 Trading is not about luck or coincidence. It’s a skill that develops through practice, discipline, and the right approach to the market 📈 Many members of the private club once started with no experience at all, and today they’re achieving completely different res…
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @Feedback_Traders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FEEDBACK CHANNEL” (@Feedback_Traders), 216 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Feedback_Traders.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.