就像我说的,NOXA的币已经绝版了,能找到的也没几个了,鸡块是唯一一个空间不错的币 PONS走势也很健康,有望冲击100M,可惜阴谋BULL没有把握局势进行反弹,大哥也不少,暂时不知道什么情况 而YOLO的做市商就能把握机会进行一波反弹给予希望,算是比较聪明的做法,能去10M的概率继续增加

Channel
文胖子频道🇨🇳 Fatman Calls
@Fatman_Channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,202subscribers
-2,491 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001951098883 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fatman_Channel |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fatman_Channel |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 3,202 | -133 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 3,335 | -156 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 3,491 | -141 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 3,632 | -131 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:23 | 3,763 | -600 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 4,363 | -119 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 4,482 | -168 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 4,650 | -244 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 4,894 | -239 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 5,133 | -133 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 5,266 | -200 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 5,466 | -181 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 5,647 | -46 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 5,693 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 5,693 | first reading |
Engagement
70 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 70 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 48s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
we r going to 100M $TENDIES
wow ansem is moving
Video, posted without a caption
GM
https://x.com/cfm_sol/status/2086787379768029595?s=20 $PONS
众所周知NOXA平台已经关闭了发币系统,目前剩下的NOXA平台的币都成了绝版,大家应该很容易能找到合适的项目进行交易 目前PONS作为龙二平台也反弹了不少,且也有不少项目随着PONS的反弹也开始反攻,其中则包括PONS DEV唯一持有的YOLO以及非常强力的阴谋BULL 而UNI平台表现略一般,但也有一定的结构为后续发展打好了基础
随着cashcat的反攻,正式迎来了RH的round 2 并且大多数之前表现不错的项目都出现了一定程度的反弹 Big week
Going back to this, I think Robinhood is in a great spot right now. Especially cashcat well above 125m now in an uptrend + Pump also leading the scene... I think the last few weeks have shown we are in the tail end of the bear market, and on-chain is first to start thriving with so many wealth opportunities the last few months since Q2. New era I took a chance and added to $YOLO. Felt fitting and been ranging in t…
$YOLO New Buy! 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 💵 1.878 ETH ($3.61K) 👤 Tx | Hash 🆕 New Holder! 📊 MC: $4.71M 📢 Ads: Launch your token here Robinfun.live , free Dex update ✅️
Video, posted without a caption
$YOLO 有机会冲击10M 毕竟这个是PONS DEV唯一持仓 现在PONS正在冲击ATH,那YOLO非常有机会成为龙二
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @Fatman_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@SquirrelBarbieGem · 24,566
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
@SquirrelChannel · 24,075
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 September 2026
@visual_hedonist · 312,529
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“文胖子频道🇨🇳 Fatman Calls” (@Fatman_Channel), 3,202 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fatman_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.