يلي بدو يجي يخبرني قبل مشان أضيفه عالغروب يلي فيه طلاب المكثفة مابحب الأمور العشوائية 😴
😢6❤4🔥1
Signed Fatima al_Zahraa Maroof

Channel
@FatimaZMstudyfiles
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,303subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002642455327 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FatimaZMstudyfiles |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FatimaZMstudyfiles |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
1,640 average views per post against 1,303 subscribers — an engagement rate of 125.8%. Across the 7,606 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 5.46% and 22.8%, with a median of 11.6%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 18 of 18 published in the window (3 exact, 15 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 29,509 |
| Mature posts only | 125.8% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 1,303 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b1000:ara · 7,606 channels · p10 2.59% · p25 5.46% · p50 11.6% · p75 22.8% · p90 40.7% |
| Position in cohort | 99.066th percentile · 10.8× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.225% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Arabic · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 1,303 | +12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 1,291 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 1,292 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 1,292 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 29,509 |
| Reactions total | 411 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
454 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 209 | 46.0% | |
| 😢 | 123 | 27.1% | |
| 🔥 | 53 | 11.7% | |
| 🤣 | 39 | 8.59% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 3.08% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 1.32% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 0.881% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.661% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.441% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 454reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
يلي بدو يجي يخبرني قبل مشان أضيفه عالغروب يلي فيه طلاب المكثفة مابحب الأمور العشوائية 😴
😢6❤4🔥1
Signed Fatima al_Zahraa Maroof
السلام عليكم طلاب الصرف صراحة لما شفت انزعاجكن على اسئلة البيتون٤ قلت مارح احكي بالصرف .. بس الأمور خرجت عن السيطرة والطلاب صارت تفكر المادة مستحيلة بسبب بعض اقوال الطلاب .. وماوقفت الأمور لهون صار بعضهن يغلطو علي لما بقلهن انتو مخربطين ترا اجباري يرحلكن علامات..! حابة وضح بعض الأمور مشان ترجع ثقتكن لنفسكن بالصرف بس تختارو مصدركن صح ◀️◀️ مثلاً ▶️▶️ اذا حدا منكن راجع الدكتور وتفاجأ انو الدكتور كاتبلو على و…
❤27🔥3😢2
Signed Fatima al_Zahraa Maroof
بناءً على طلبكن.. ◀️ كورس أساسات٢ ▶️ ( الطريقة الوحيدة لتعوضو الأساسات١ هي تقديمكن المنيح بالأساسات٢ 🥲💔 ) مشان ما تنزلو كتير بالفحص والشوب رح يكون الكورس عبارة عن جلستين فقط كل جلسة تقريباً ساعتين .. هالطريقة مشيت عليها للحملة الفصل الماضي ولحقو المادة بأقل وقت وأقل عدد من النزلات وكانت علاماتن رائعة ف رح أكررها معكن 🔥 مواعيد الجلستين ⏰🗓️ 👈🏻 ٦ الشهر يوم الخميس 👈🏻 ١٠ الشهر يوم الاثنين طبعاً مافي مجال لتغ…
❤7🔥3😢1
Signed Fatima al_Zahraa Maroof
لما طالب ال ٧٣ يرفه عن نفسه ..🥲 لازم كل شوي يتذكر المادة يلي فرش فيها.. يعني هي ساعة ؟؟ ولا محرك عاطل عن العمل مرتبط بكتلة الطابق الأول 💔 ... بالمناسبة : هي الغرفة محاكاة لغرفة مين ؟😴🩷 حدا بيعرف ؟😶
🤣28😢6💔4❤2
Signed Fatima al_Zahraa Maroof
خلص مشي الحال اذا درستا رح ابعتا هون ان شاء الله بس ما أظن شكلي مارح لحق🥲
😢21❤4
Signed Fatima al_Zahraa Maroof
تتذكرو المسألة المهضومة يلي اجت الفصل الماضي بالبيتون٢ يلي عندو حلها يصورو ويبعتلي 😴
😢9❤4🤣2
Signed Fatima al_Zahraa Maroof
للافادة
❤4😢3🤩1
Signed Fatima al_Zahraa Maroof
بعد أكشن نوطة الديناميك لازم طلاب ال٧٣ يحبوني اكتر🤣🤣 يوم الصرف بتذكر افتل عالقاعات واخبي النوط تحت الشناتي وقاعتي لقبل تسليم الاوراق لقيت حدا دخل وحط نوطة كمان طلعت خبيتا واستلمت ورقتي متأخرة 🤣💔 ايييه نيالكن 🤣💔💔 وبدون مزح هالعادة كل سنة ننبه عليها وبتصير يلي بدو ياخد نوطتو يراجع منها يجيب معو كيس يخبيها او يتركا برا لانو هالموضوع حساس عند بعض الدكاترة ! لعل وعسى تختفي هالظاهرة 😴
😢17❤13👍9🤩2🔥1
Signed Fatima al_Zahraa Maroof
توقعاتي 💯🤣
🔥12😢4❤1👍1🥰1
Signed Fatima al_Zahraa Maroof
#هام زملاء يبدأ تسليم حلقات البحث من الساعة 12 ونص في مكتب الهيئة الطلابية. وحتى الساعة 2 ونص ولايوجد مناقشة
❤1
Signed Fatima al_Zahraa Maroof
هاد الملف كنت مجمعة فيه الفصل الماضي الأسئلة النظرية للديناميك بكل الدورات تبعيت الدكتورة مابعرف اذا بفيد بشي هي السنة
❤6😢3👍1
Signed Fatima al_Zahraa Maroof
اعلان ... يا جماعة السكك بعد عدة جدالات .. رح تصير كالتالي .. فيه كورس جلستين لآخر تلت اقسام عملي قبل السكك مباشرة 🔹 ١٢ الشهر التامن (جلسة ١) 🔹١٥ الشهر التامن (جلسة ٢ ) يلي مزنوق وما بيحسن يحضر بهالموعدين يبعتلي نعمل جلسة بكرة (الاثنين ) مشانن بس بسرعة 🔸 يلي بدو يحضر الاقسام التلاتة الباقية كلن ((٣٠ الف)) 🔸 يلي بدو بس المفاتيح ((٢٥ الف))
❤7😢4👍1🔥1
Signed Fatima al_Zahraa Maroof
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FatimaZMstudyfiles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 617,610 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fatima Z M _ study files 🗂” (@FatimaZMstudyfiles), 1,303 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FatimaZMstudyfiles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.