Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مهرداد فرهمند

Channel

مهرداد فرهمند

@FarahmandBeirut

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,723subscribers

-78 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001119540513
TypeChannel
Username@FarahmandBeirut
Created23 July 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/FarahmandBeirut

Growth

6,7236,8016,7626 August 2026 — 6,801 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,801 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,799 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,792 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,783 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,764 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,758 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,751 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,749 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,739 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,734 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,730 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,723 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 35 days, net -78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,711–6,813 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 20:376,723-7
4 Sept 2026, 12:596,730-4
1 Sept 2026, 08:156,734-5
29 Aug 2026, 10:586,739-10
26 Aug 2026, 01:436,749-2
22 Aug 2026, 20:186,751-7
19 Aug 2026, 13:036,758-6
16 Aug 2026, 16:036,764-19
13 Aug 2026, 06:276,783-9
10 Aug 2026, 06:156,792-7
6 Aug 2026, 22:006,799-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:186,801no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:246,801first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 16 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.0%
avg views ÷ 6,723 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,890
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held22 (16 January 202613 August 2026)
Views total5,780
Reactions total370
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,491 reactions across 22 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,11447.1%
1,06623.7%
👎53812.0%
💩1904.23%
🖕1042.32%
👏1032.29%
😁902.00%
👌841.87%
🤣440.98%
🤮360.802%
🤔320.713%
😢160.356%
💯110.245%
🤡90.2%
🍾70.156%
🌭60.134%
🔥50.111%
🙏50.111%
👻40.089%
😭40.089%
11 further kinds230.512%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,491 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC≈2,950 views183 reactionsread 20 August 2026

من از جدل‌ شخصی بیزارم و این سطور را بر خلاف میلم و تنها با این هدف می‌نویسم که اطلاعات غلطی که آقای مجید تفرشی بار دیگر در مورد بنده مطرح کرده‌اند، بی‌پاسخ نماند و شبهه‌ای ایجاد نکند. ایشان فرموده‌اند بنده تاریخ نمی‌دانم. اولاً بنده نه تحصیلاتم تاریخ است، نه پژوهشگر تاریخم و نه ادعای تاریخ‌دانی دارم. من علاقمند به تاریخم اما هر دو دلیلی که آقای تفرشی بر تاریخ‌ندانی بنده آورده، سست و بی‌اساس است. فرموده‌اند بنده چند

👍11258💯5🍾4👎2👀1👏1

13 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC≈2,830 views187 reactionsread 20 August 2026

اگر درباره موتور کامیون هم اطلاعات غلط می‌دادند، اشتباهاتشان را گوشزد می‌کردم. در پایان، دوست دارم برادرانه به عرض ایشان برسانم که بنده در زندگی‌ام مورخ کم ندیده‌ام. با مورخان برجسته‌ای نشست و برخاست داشته‌ام که شخصیت‌های مرجع و دانشگاهی‌اند و اگر نام ببرم همه می‌شناسند. هیچ‌کدامشان یک صدم تکبر و خودشیفتگی شما را ندارند آقای تفرشی.

85👍72👏19💯5🍾3👎2🥴1

23 May 2026, 15:34 UTC≈10,000 views499 reactionsread 20 August 2026

گمان کنم یک سال و نیم پیش بود که از شبکه من‌وتو با همسرم هستی پودفروش تماس گرفتند و گفتند به مناسبت بازگشایی شبکه، در حال گردآوری پیام‌های تصویری‌اند. از همسرم که پیشتر گاهی مهمان برنامه‌های من‌وتو می‌شد خواستند او هم پیامی تصویری بدهد. به همسرم گفتم حتماً این کار را بکن و اگر بخواهند، من هم حاضرم پیام تصویری بفرستم. خانمی که با همسرم تماس گرفته بود از این‌که من هم پیام بفرستم خیلی استقبال کرد. پیامی فرستادم و بلافاص

👍31984👏27👎26🤮16💩14👌7🤣3

10 Apr 2026, 20:53 UTC≈9,990 views51 reactionsread 20 August 2026

‏در این ویدیو دلایلم را هم برای بدبینی و هم خوش‌بینی به مذاکرات اسلام‌آباد بیان کرده‌ام که البته کفه بدبینی بسیار سنگینی می‌کند. این را هم گفتم که رضا خان حزب‌اللهی (لقبی که قالیباف به خودش داده بود) اگر دست پر از اسلام‌آباد برگردد، رضا خان سردارسپه خواهد بود و در آینده: باقر شاه https://youtu.be/wUG7SE6fDdk?si=Ui4vRCNo2O7nVhI_

👍308😁5👎3🤔3🤮2

30 Mar 2026, 13:24 UTC≈11,000 views40 reactionsread 20 August 2026

با اینکه وزیرخارجه پاکستان اعلام کرده که قرار است بزودی میزبان مذاکرات ایران و امریکا باشد، به نظر من جای خوشبینی نسبت به این خبر وجود ندارد. استدلالم را در این ویدیو گفته‌ام. https://youtu.be/51_KttpCIB8?si=LZroub9iB_n1lrSx

👍296👎2🤔2💩1

20 Mar 2026, 19:53 UTC≈10,400 views357 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

وقتی حتی سر سال تحویل، دشمن از زخم زدن بر سرزمین ما دست نمی‌کشد، وقتی در همان لحظات آغاز سال نو، هم‌میهنانمان پرپر شدند. جایی برای تبریک نوروز نیست. اما آدمی به امید زنده است. همچنان می‌توان آرزو کرد. آرزو می‌کنم هرچه زودتر کشور ما از این جنگ، سربلند و یکپارچه بیرون بیاید و بقیه سال به بازسازی خانه امیدمان بگذرد. آرزو می‌کنم سال نو آینده را در ایرانی آزاد، نیرومند و سرشار از آرامش و شادی جشن بگیریم. يا مقلب القلوب و

287💩34👍19🤮7👎6👏2😁2

17 Mar 2026, 12:52 UTC≈9,660 views131 reactionsread 20 August 2026

بمباران سنگین دیشب تهران نشان داد که اسرائیل اگر احتمال بدهد هدف در یکی از پنجاه نقطه احتمالی است. هر پنجاه نقطه را بی‌توجه به درصد احتمال می‌زند. کشته‌ها و خسارات غیرنظامی هم برایش مهم نیست. در این ویدیو به این پرداخته‌ام که چگونه حذف لاریجانی در راستای پروژه اسرائیل برای ادامه جنگ و ویرانی کامل ایران است. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zELLPEnWGKs

👌49💩39👎13👍10😢8🤮54🤬2

16 Mar 2026, 12:13 UTC≈7,230 views47 reactionsread 20 August 2026

اگر پیام رضا پهلوی برای چهارشنبه سوری، فراخوان تلقی شود و این فراخوان بگیرد، دو نتیجه بیشتر ندارد که در این ویدیو توضیح داده‌ام. فعلاً شدت گرفتن قطع اینترنت نشان می‌دهد که این پیام در حد فراخوان جدی گرفته شده است. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0sycZQnIEQ

👍29👎104🤮2👌1🤨1

15 Mar 2026, 18:35 UTC≈6,100 views63 reactionsread 20 August 2026

ویدیوی من درباره «گارد جاویدان» https://youtu.be/lPiZuv5dN-0?si=TV3GjF0rdenMg8qw

34👍18💩8👎3

3 Mar 2026, 17:56 UTC≈7,810 views59 reactionsread 20 August 2026

وال استریت جورنال خبر داده که ترامپ استفاده از نیروهای قومیتی، از جمله احزبا مسلح کرد ایرانی را به عنوان نیروی زمینی در جنگ با ایران در نظر گرفته است. اکسیوس نیز خبر داده که اسرائیل پیشاپیش روی نیروهای مسلح کرد ایرانی سرمایه‌گذاری کرده و نتانیاهو در دیدار اخیرش با ترامپ در وایت‌هاوس او را به استفاده از این نیروها تشویق کرده است. دیروز از منبعی موثق در کردستان عراق خبردار شدم که احزاب مسلح کرد ایرانی در آستانه ورود به

👍27👎168👏3😢3🤬2

1 Mar 2026, 20:02 UTC≈6,420 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026

ترامپ گفته برای ایران رهبر معرفی خواهد کرد. در این ویدیو رهبرهای احتمالی را بررسی کرده‌ام که ترامپ معرفی خواهد کرد یا خواهد پذیرفت. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOmILualzQs

👍114👻4🤣3🤮3😡2

26 Feb 2026, 17:35 UTC≈8,870 views137 reactionsread 20 August 2026

‏در این ویدیو علاوه بر پرداختن به این سؤال استدلال کرده‌ام که «چرا انقلاب ملی ایرانیان» عبارت غلطی است. https://youtu.be/D2HjK9MYaeY?si=aRYFCzLia95oeUWM

👍68💩4710👎6👏3😁2🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @FarahmandBeirut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

هزار داستان با مسعود بهنود
@hezardastanbehnood · 44,484
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Moein
@NMoein · 50,231
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
Renani Mohsen / محسن رنانی
@Renani_Mohsen · 68,464
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
صادق زیباکلام - Sadegh Zibakalam
@sadeghZibakalam · 53,805
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مهرداد فرهمند” (@FarahmandBeirut), 6,723 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FarahmandBeirut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.