کانال دوم یوتیوبیام با نام ناگفته از فردا کار خود را آغاز میکند
❤38👍29👏8🤮8😘3🍾1🔥1

Channel
@FarahmandBeirut
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,768subscribers
-33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001119540513 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FarahmandBeirut |
| Created | 23 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FarahmandBeirut |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:37 | 6,768 | +113 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:31 | 6,655 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:50 | 6,660 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:51 | 6,661 | -7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:09 | 6,668 | -5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:05 | 6,673 | +2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:48 | 6,671 | -8 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:40 | 6,679 | -6 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 10:41 | 6,685 | -13 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 13:01 | 6,698 | -9 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 6,707 | -5 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 6,712 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:15 | 6,715 | -8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 6,723 | -7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 6,730 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 6,734 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 6,739 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 6,749 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 6,751 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 6,758 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 16 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (16 January 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 31,450 |
| Reactions total | 332 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 01:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,908 reactions across 28 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,303 | 46.9% | |
| ❤ | 1,192 | 24.3% | |
| 👎 | 559 | 11.4% | |
| 💩 | 194 | 3.95% | |
| 👏 | 118 | 2.40% | |
| 🖕 | 104 | 2.12% | |
| 😁 | 91 | 1.85% | |
| 👌 | 84 | 1.71% | |
| 🤣 | 61 | 1.24% | |
| 🤮 | 48 | 0.978% | |
| 🤔 | 32 | 0.652% | |
| 🤡 | 17 | 0.346% | |
| 😢 | 16 | 0.326% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 0.244% | |
| 🙏 | 12 | 0.244% | |
| 🍌 | 8 | 0.163% | |
| 🍾 | 8 | 0.163% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 0.143% | |
| 😘 | 7 | 0.143% | |
| 🌭 | 6 | 0.122% | |
| 13 further kinds | 29 | 0.591% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,908 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
کانال دوم یوتیوبیام با نام ناگفته از فردا کار خود را آغاز میکند
❤38👍29👏8🤮8😘3🍾1🔥1
در این ویدیو استدلال کردهام که چگونه انتخابات اسرائیل به سود نتانیاهو تمام شده و او به هر حال بر اریکه قدرت باقی خواهد ماند مگر اینکه شگفتی و اتفاق خارقالعادهای رخ دهد. متآسفانه پنج دقیقه نخست ویدئو صدا ندارد و بقیه ویدئو هم کیفیت صدایش قدری پایین است. دوستان علاقمند ویدئو را از دقیقه پنج به بعد ببینند و قدری صدای گوشی یا لپ تاپ خود را بالا ببرند. https://www.youtube.com/live/41o4wHnIcsE?si=KvyARkDOTJTkXd_r
👍23👎5❤3🤣3
در این ویدیو به این موضوع پرداختهام که این انتخابات برای اسرائیلیها هم بزنگاهی تاریخی است، نه به سبب مسئله جنگ با ایران بلکه از سر نگرانی نسبت به مسیری که کشورشان در آن حرکت میکند. https://youtu.be/wh1aSm_91_Y?si=3VY5f4FRlOWpMbH9
👍24🙏7🤣4👎3❤1❤🔥1🤡1
ویدیوی من درباره اینکه چرا «متحدان» ایران در عراق، اقدامی در برابر بستن فرودگاهها و گذرگاههای مرزی به روی ایران نکردند: https://youtu.be/NIGXHjzOW-4?si=1B5_7XaM3txBk_qC
👍23🤣10❤3
در این ویدیو رقیب نتانیاهو را در انتخابات اسرائیل معرفی کرده و به این پرسش پرداختهام که در صورت پیروزی او، سیاست اسرائیل در قبال جنگ با ایران چه تفاوتی ممکن است بکند: https://youtu.be/WKTezO9gzlM?si=Q_8REkimUUgne2bw
👍27❤11🤮4👏2🍌1🤡1
پس از شش ماه کانال یوتیوبم را دوباره راهاندازی کردم. ویدیوی تازهام را ببینید: 👇👇👇 https://youtu.be/29CB_wFi-FA?si=HOQuO3WYnEF6emuF
❤35👍28👎12🍌7👏2💩1💯1🔥1
اگر درباره موتور کامیون هم اطلاعات غلط میدادند، اشتباهاتشان را گوشزد میکردم. در پایان، دوست دارم برادرانه به عرض ایشان برسانم که بنده در زندگیام مورخ کم ندیدهام. با مورخان برجستهای نشست و برخاست داشتهام که شخصیتهای مرجع و دانشگاهیاند و اگر نام ببرم همه میشناسند. هیچکدامشان یک صدم تکبر و خودشیفتگی شما را ندارند آقای تفرشی.
❤101👍80👏20💯5🍾3👎2🤡1🥴1
من از جدل شخصی بیزارم و این سطور را بر خلاف میلم و تنها با این هدف مینویسم که اطلاعات غلطی که آقای مجید تفرشی بار دیگر در مورد بنده مطرح کردهاند، بیپاسخ نماند و شبههای ایجاد نکند. ایشان فرمودهاند بنده تاریخ نمیدانم. اولاً بنده نه تحصیلاتم تاریخ است، نه پژوهشگر تاریخم و نه ادعای تاریخدانی دارم. من علاقمند به تاریخم اما هر دو دلیلی که آقای تفرشی بر تاریخندانی بنده آورده، سست و بیاساس است. فرمودهاند بنده چند …
👍130❤72💯5🍾4👎2👏2👀1
گمان کنم یک سال و نیم پیش بود که از شبکه منوتو با همسرم هستی پودفروش تماس گرفتند و گفتند به مناسبت بازگشایی شبکه، در حال گردآوری پیامهای تصویریاند. از همسرم که پیشتر گاهی مهمان برنامههای منوتو میشد خواستند او هم پیامی تصویری بدهد. به همسرم گفتم حتماً این کار را بکن و اگر بخواهند، من هم حاضرم پیام تصویری بفرستم. خانمی که با همسرم تماس گرفته بود از اینکه من هم پیام بفرستم خیلی استقبال کرد. پیامی فرستادم و بلافاص…
👍326❤87👏28👎26🤮16💩15👌7🤣3
در این ویدیو دلایلم را هم برای بدبینی و هم خوشبینی به مذاکرات اسلامآباد بیان کردهام که البته کفه بدبینی بسیار سنگینی میکند. این را هم گفتم که رضا خان حزباللهی (لقبی که قالیباف به خودش داده بود) اگر دست پر از اسلامآباد برگردد، رضا خان سردارسپه خواهد بود و در آینده: باقر شاه https://youtu.be/wUG7SE6fDdk?si=Ui4vRCNo2O7nVhI_
👍30❤8😁5👎3🤔3🤮2🤡1
با اینکه وزیرخارجه پاکستان اعلام کرده که قرار است بزودی میزبان مذاکرات ایران و امریکا باشد، به نظر من جای خوشبینی نسبت به این خبر وجود ندارد. استدلالم را در این ویدیو گفتهام. https://youtu.be/51_KttpCIB8?si=LZroub9iB_n1lrSx
👍29❤6👎2🤔2💩1
وقتی حتی سر سال تحویل، دشمن از زخم زدن بر سرزمین ما دست نمیکشد، وقتی در همان لحظات آغاز سال نو، هممیهنانمان پرپر شدند. جایی برای تبریک نوروز نیست. اما آدمی به امید زنده است. همچنان میتوان آرزو کرد. آرزو میکنم هرچه زودتر کشور ما از این جنگ، سربلند و یکپارچه بیرون بیاید و بقیه سال به بازسازی خانه امیدمان بگذرد. آرزو میکنم سال نو آینده را در ایرانی آزاد، نیرومند و سرشار از آرامش و شادی جشن بگیریم. يا مقلب القلوب و…
❤289💩35👍19🤮7👎6👏2😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @FarahmandBeirut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مهرداد فرهمند” (@FarahmandBeirut), 6,768 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FarahmandBeirut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.