Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Фан Соляныч

@FanSolyanich

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,342subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002382192188
TypeChannel
Username@FanSolyanich
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FanSolyanich

Growth

3,3383,3433,340.56 August 2026 — 3,338 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,338 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,343 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,342 subscribers3,3426 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,337–3,344 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:333,342-1
9 Aug 2026, 17:023,343+5
6 Aug 2026, 10:523,338no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:063,338first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.1%
avg views ÷ 3,342 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,810
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 December 20253 August 2026)
Views total5,420
Reactions total281
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 13m
Average length
12m 18s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,827 reactions across 18 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,26244.6%
❤‍🔥2368.35%
💋2318.17%
👍1776.26%
😱1675.91%
💅1445.09%
🎉1113.93%
🔥983.47%
😭913.22%
🤓381.34%
🥰361.27%
🍌321.13%
280.99%
🖕280.99%
😨240.849%
🤡210.743%
🤝110.389%
🫡100.354%
🤣80.283%
👌60.212%
20 further kinds682.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,827reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,790 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍26🤓14💋2

3 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,810 views171 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хз на каком моменте ютуб триггернулся, но сейчас с этой их аудио нейронкой уже лишний раз приходится цензурить даже такие слова, как: убийство, смерть, террорист, теракт, насилие. Я щас монтирую следующий видос, буквально по кускам загружаю небольшие фрагменты, чтобы проверить, на что триггерится ютуб. Мне уже удалили видос с фрагментом, где было сказано «я за терроров зайду», хотя оно было сказано в контексте КС. Та

❤‍🔥12622👍10😭8🗿3💋2

3 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,820 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

‼️ПЕРЕЗАЛИВ‼️ ФАН СОЛЯНКА 3 (Без цензуры) Пацаны: Руди: @therudygroup Сосидж: @msbigsaigon Ярос: @YarosNefrit Тобл: @tobltg Айк: @AikMeme Ваня Бром: @brom_broadcast P.S. Сори, ютуб удалил видос, пушто увидел в нем экстремизм и терроризм, поэтому пусть будет здесь, но если нужно на ютубе, то остались реакты на него (вот такой прекол, да): Yarosus Stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_IQw-1KxcA Jiskiran: https:/

❤‍🔥47😨9💅74💋1

28 Jun 2026, 11:59 UTC≈4,220 views299 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

absolute sps! ✋😧🤚

223🔥47💅18🥰3😱3🍌2🤮2❤‍🔥1

27 Jun 2026, 20:36 UTC≈76,900 views166 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

КИБЕР ФАН СОЛЯНОСТЬ 11 (Без цензуры) Пацаны: Руди: @therudygroup Сосидж: @msbigsaigon Ярос: @YarosNefrit Тобл: @tobltg Айк: @AikMeme Ваня Бром: @brom_broadcast Морган: @arteemoov Кибер сверх гигантская благодарность за просмотр на ютубе🤘😬 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wau0KT--k-s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wau0KT--k-s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wau0KT--k-s

🎉111👍20❤‍🔥176🦄4😱3🍌2👀1

28 Apr 2026, 22:10 UTC≈75,900 views171 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ЯПОНСКИЙ ЭКСПИРИЕНС 2 (Без цензуры) Пацаны: Руди: @therudygroup Сосидж: @msbigsaigon Тобл: @tobltg Ваня Бром: @brom_broadcast Ютуб версия: https://youtu.be/xy800KRDUXI Стрим: https://www.youtube.com/live/4iHTd3u4naY

113❤‍🔥31🖕8💅7🍾5🍓2🔥2👍1

9 Apr 2026, 10:21 UTC≈20,700 views153 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ДОГОВОРНЯЧОК В ПИКЕ (РУДИ, АРТЁМОВ) - Без цензуры Стримблеры: Руди Артёмов Также: Джамал (Серёга) Тётя Ксюша Труман Ютуб версия: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHS-sUqJtDA Стримы: Руди: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkjX7UcRLU8 Артём: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUpPvlGpN7w

108😱30💅8🖕3👎2🍌1🍓1

29 Mar 2026, 12:57 UTC≈36,700 views111 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А чё было? Стримы не смотрю прост… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw2MvRRGb_8

88🤝11🔥62🍌1🖕1🤨1🥱1

26 Feb 2026, 15:19 UTC≈40,900 views221 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Шнёня – Сосидж (Без цензуры, 18+) Стример: @msbigsaigon Ютуб версия: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AH7zFC_6YY Стрим: https://www.youtube.com/live/iGwdJ2IIQsI?si=ojgQ-x09F4aBr9DQ

148💅41❤‍🔥13💘5🤣5😍5👀2🖕1

4 Feb 2026, 16:02 UTC≈9,680 views129 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Он баякается🤬🤬 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBqb7VCEkI4

😱6142😨11🫡4👻3👍2🤣2🌚1

3 Feb 2026, 17:58 UTC≈6,110 views96 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @YarosNefritPhoto

Новое кайфовое видео на канале! Приятного просмотра! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5f--yhdghwM

53🤓24🫡64👍32🍌1💅1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FanSolyanich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 685,269 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фан Соляныч” (@FanSolyanich), 3,342 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FanSolyanich.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.