Channel
@Fampartian
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002539150593 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fampartian |
| Description | ⓘ Everything you will watch in this channel is computer graphics, these actions are fictitious, the characters are not real. |
| Created | 15 April 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fampartian |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 50 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 50 | first reading |
2 posts held, back to 15 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
246 reactions across 1 post, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 68 | 27.6% | |
| 🔥 | 50 | 20.3% | |
| 🤩 | 49 | 19.9% | |
| ❤ | 47 | 19.1% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 5.69% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 2.44% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 2.44% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 1.22% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.813% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.407% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2025 to 15 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Fampartian. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 2 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 April 2025 to 15 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
鶐鎰鞠妻属重 鞠妻属鶐鞠妻鞠鶐妻鎰妻鞠鶐 😋妻鎰配鞠鎰鶐游妻属鶐鞠妻鞠鶐提裂鶐😋妻 種🇪🇺讨论群 - 解惑答疑专区 联系 新币担保重要公告为防范区块交易量过载风险，新币担保将于 2025 年4月5日进行担保上押地址更换。老上押地址保留两个月，不用于新群上押，唯一上押地址正式更换为： TRC20: TKiGdnr3U8UkG5rBcAfscag68gJGvryNdv ERC20：0x3DF41D385Dc036bbC8adfa94729c171Bb33B2caD 望往所有新币担保用户知悉，惠存。任何疑问直接垂询 24小时客服 @xbkf 新币担保2025.4.5新币官方永久联系方式公示： ————新币官网——— 新币官网 xinbi.c…
🎉68🔥50🤩49❤47👍14❤🔥6🥰6🙈3
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @Fampartian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“«-:?.!___^*]” (@Fampartian), 50 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fampartian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.