Be kind โฅ๏ธ
โค6,070๐2,600๐คฎ1,810๐คฌ1,330๐ฉ723โคโ๐ฅ691๐ฅ689๐581
![Telegram profile photo for โข O x ส [๐ฎ๐ณ] โข](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/43/431cbd4d268bd64fd74356526348a3f4e4fcbb8f8b34aea0c0026c5621aea368.jpg)
Channel
@FallenAngel_xD
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
15,938subscribers
-24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001553706188 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FallenAngel_xD |
| Description | Shikayatein toh khud sai hai ..... Tumsai toh aj bhi sirf ishq hai </3 |
| Created | 8 January 2022 โ measured โ dated from the channelโs first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FallenAngel_xD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 15,938 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 15,939 | +7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 15,932 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 15,942 | -13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 15,955 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 15,954 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 15,964 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 15,972 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 15,962 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 8 January 2022 โ the reader has reached the start of this channelโs public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 21 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 16 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
59,489 reactions across 6 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 15,740 | 26.5% | |
| ๐ฉ | 9,820 | 16.5% | |
| ๐ | 9,460 | 15.9% | |
| ๐ฅ | 3,616 | 6.08% | |
| ๐คฎ | 3,394 | 5.71% | |
| ๐ | 3,390 | 5.70% | |
| ๐ | 2,488 | 4.18% | |
| ๐ | 1,852 | 3.11% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 1,779 | 2.99% | |
| ๐ | 1,529 | 2.57% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 1,411 | 2.37% | |
| ๐คฌ | 1,330 | 2.24% | |
| ๐ | 655 | 1.10% | |
| ๐คก | 627 | 1.05% | |
| ๐คฉ | 577 | 0.97% | |
| ๐ | 535 | 0.899% | |
| ๐ณ | 421 | 0.708% | |
| ๐ | 320 | 0.538% | |
| ๐ก | 239 | 0.402% | |
| โ | 153 | 0.257% | |
| 1 further kind | 153 | 0.257% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 59,489reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2022 to 30 July 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Be kind โฅ๏ธ
โค6,070๐2,600๐คฎ1,810๐คฌ1,330๐ฉ723โคโ๐ฅ691๐ฅ689๐581
โญโโโโโโโขโโขโโโโโโโฎ โผ @LalloBilloOp (Gaming channel) โผ @FactsForYouByGirish (For Facts) โผ @PopCornVideos [18+] โผ @HawtPackz [Stickers] โผ @FeelingsOP โผ @AboutOxy โฐโโโโโโโขโโขโโโโโโโฏ
โค1,750๐ฉ897๐755๐543๐ฅ399โคโ๐ฅ322๐320๐254
.
โค1,720๐1,550๐ฉ1,260๐ฅฐ1,190๐544๐518๐ฅ517๐517
.
โค1,550๐ฉ1,000๐774๐765๐366๐281๐279๐คก278
.
โค2,290๐ฉ1,930๐1,130๐ฅ1,040๐704๐ฅฐ589๐คฎ585๐576
.
๐ฉ4,010๐2,660โค2,360๐ฅ971๐825๐คฎ620๐475๐451
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @FallenAngel_xD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 968,992 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@FallenAngel_xD named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โโข O x ส [๐ฎ๐ณ] โขโ (@FallenAngel_xD), 15,938 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FallenAngel_xD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.