3 measurements spanning 67 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 7β8 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Oct 2026, 10:49
7
-1
12 Aug 2026, 15:48
8
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:12
8
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 September 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
86 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
π
48
55.8%
π₯
13
15.1%
π
11
12.8%
π€
5
5.81%
π€
4
4.65%
π―
2
2.33%
π€―
2
2.33%
β€
1
1.16%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2024 to 28 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#qiziq
1886-yil 29-mart kuni dunyoga mashhur Coca-Cola ichimligining birinchi retsepti yaratilgan. Bugungi kunda bu ichimlik dunyoning deyarli barcha mamlakatlarida sevilib isteβmol qilinadi.
"Siz Coca-Colani yoqtirasizmi ?"
@FaktZona_1 π
π Ot kuchi nimani anglatadi?
Avtomobillar haqida gapirganda "ot kuchi" atamasini tez-tez qoβllaymiz. Xoβsh, ot kuchi qachondan beri qoβllanilgan va uning maΚΌnosi nima?
"Ot kuchi" atamasi kuchni emas balki quvvatni anglatadi. Mashhur fizik olim Jeyms Vatt aniqlashicha 1 ta ot 1 minutda 100 fut (30 metr) chuqurlikdan 330 funt (150 kg.) koβmirni blokka bogβlangan arqon orqali tortib chiqara olar ekan. Ana shu ishni baβ¦
Bugun 2025-yil 28-mart, juma kuni.
Yana bir qiziqarli fakt: Har yili 28-martda Xalqaro teatr kuni nishonlanadi. Bu kun dunyo bo'ylab teatr san'atiga bo'lgan hurmat va e'tiborni oshirish uchun tashkil etilgan.
@FaktZona_1 π
#uxlash
Bilarmidingiz?
Kech uxlashga yotgan odamlar erta uxlab yotganlarga qaraganda yuqori darajadagi aqlga idrokga ega ekanligi isbotlangan.
@FaktZona_1 π
#qiziq
Bir dona ruchkada 50 mingtaga yaqin soβzni yozsa boβladi.
Dunyo boβyicha har soniyada 125 ta avtoruchka sotiladi.
Har yili dunyoda 100 kishi avtoruchkaga tiqilib oβladi.
π‘@Qiziqarli_faktlar_39
Mushuklar odamlarni kattaligi oβzgargan mushuk deb biladi!
Ular bizni ham mushuksimonlar oilasiga tegishli deb his qilishadi.
π‘@Qiziqarli_faktlar_39
π5π₯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FaktZona_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Inson miyyasining π§ necha foizi suvdanπ§ iborat βοΈ
60 %29%
80 %29%
90 %35%
50 %6%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2024 to 28 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@FaktZona_1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
@qiziqarli_faktlar_39 named in 13 posts, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.