Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قناة شادى فوركس

Channel

قناة شادى فوركس

@FXSHADY

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,365subscribers

+170 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002157780446
TypeChannel
Username@FXSHADY
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FXSHADY

Growth

3,1933,3673,2806 August 2026 — 3,195 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,193 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,279 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,345 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,363 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,367 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,365 subscribers3,3656 August 202622 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 16 days, net +170. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,167–3,393 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 16:163,365-2
19 Aug 2026, 07:243,367+4
16 Aug 2026, 14:533,363+18
13 Aug 2026, 01:153,345+66
10 Aug 2026, 08:353,279+86
6 Aug 2026, 22:063,193-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:493,195first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.9%
avg views ÷ 3,365 subscribers
Avg views / post
769
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held18 (23 June 202630 July 2026)
Views total3,847
Reactions total46
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 34s
Average length
1m 34s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7457.4%
👍3023.3%
🔥1310.1%
💔64.65%
👏32.33%
👌10.775%
🦄10.775%
🫡10.775%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
51
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FXSHADY. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 21:39 UTC419 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

لا تجعل خوفك يثنيك عن التقدم والنجاح، تقدم وستأتي الثقة لاحقا.

7🔥3👍1🦄1🫡1

Signed Shady Soft

30 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC416 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @forexarabPhoto

ناتج اليوم توصيات واشارات https://t.me/forexarab

3👍1

Signed Shady Soft

29 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC982 views12 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

ترتيبى على مستوى العالم من افضل 120 اشارة فى النمو والصمود فى السوق https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2318017

🔥65👍1

Signed Shady Soft

29 Jul 2026, 14:54 UTC≈1,010 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

خل الفترة القادمة نغير الاستراتجية تماما فى الاعتماد على ال AI وادوات الذكاء الصناعى ونعمل دروس لافكار بيتم برمجتها عبر الذكاء الصناعى مع التست الفعلى عليها وطرح تلك الافكار والنتائج وعمل مجموعة تختص بتلك الادوات والتجارب وشرط لدخول المجموعة التفاعل ووضع نتايج التجربة قريب جدا نبدء باذن الله .. لم يعد فى السوق اى فكرة تستطيع الصمود اكتر من شهر على بعضه وبيطلع الاصفر المجنون الىل دمر السوق تماما باى حاجة تدمرها تماما

7👍3👏1

Signed Shady Soft

29 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC≈1,020 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

الايداع 2000 دولار بالسنت الارباح 2500 دولار بالسنت فى ظل كل ماحدث بالسوق خلال تلك الفترة التاريخية التى لم يتبقى بها متداولون نجح الذكاء الصناعى فى اجتياز تلك الحقبة ا ولمتابعة الفكرة 262421386 sSHADY@2026 Exness-MT5Trial16

4👍2

Signed Shady Soft

25 Jun 2026, 21:33 UTC≈3,160 views15 reactions50 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مؤشر تريدنج فيو + الاعدادات كاملة لكل من الدهب والبيتكوين @OOEAAOO

9👍3💔3

Signed Shady Soft

25 Jun 2026, 21:31 UTC≈2,960 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مؤشر سمارت فلتر مخصص تريدنج فيو ونتائج احترافية فى الدهب تقدر تشوف ااشارته على القناة هنا https://t.me/shadysofttvw

3👍1

Signed Shady Soft

25 Jun 2026, 21:29 UTC≈2,590 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مؤشر سمارت فلتر مخصص تريدنج فيو ونتائج احترافية على البيتكوين تقدر تشوف ااشارته على القناة هنا https://t.me/shadysofttvw

👍32🔥2

Signed Shady Soft

25 Jun 2026, 20:47 UTC≈2,340 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

الدهب ايضا كانت معركة وانتهت لصالح البوت بتارجت اليوم 50 دولار 262421386 sSHADY@2026 Exness-MT5Trial16

2👍2

Signed Shady Soft

25 Jun 2026, 20:45 UTC≈2,080 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

كانت حرب ضروس مع البيتكوين وبرغم ان التارجت 40 دولار الا ان ربنا كرمه بتارجت اعلى وقفل التداول اليومى على كده 262421386 sSHADY@2026 Exness-MT5Trial16

3👍1

Signed Shady Soft

24 Jun 2026, 18:33 UTC≈1,760 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📱 سوق العملات المشفرة تخسر رسمياً أكثر من نصف قيمتها في أقل من 9 أشهر فقط 📅 في السادس من أكتوبر/ تشرين الأول 2025، وصلت القيمة السوقية الإجمالية للعملات المشفرة إلى رقم قياسي قدره 4.3 تريليون دولار 📉 اليوم، بعد 261 يوماً، تبلغ قيمة العملات المشفرة تريليوني دولار فقط، مما يمثل انخفاضاً بنسبة 54% في القيمة 📊 هذا يعني أن أسواق العملات المشفرة قد محت متوسطاً قدره 8.8 مليار دولار يومياً خلال الفترة المذكورة 📉 عملة بتك

3👍1

Signed Shady Soft

24 Jun 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,550 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/FXSHADY/1124

3

Signed Shady Soft

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @FXSHADY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 322,875 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قناة شادى فوركس” (@FXSHADY), 3,365 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FXSHADY.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.