2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,813–1,817 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 11:32
1,815
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:46
1,815
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
50.4%
avg views ÷ 1,815 subscribers
Avg views / post
916
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held
19 (20 February 2026 – 24 July 2026)
Views total
1,831
Reactions total
39
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
14
Links
107
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
289 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
75
26.0%
❤
69
23.9%
👍
57
19.7%
💯
20
6.92%
🤣
19
6.57%
😢
17
5.88%
😱
16
5.54%
🙏
4
1.38%
❤🔥
3
1.04%
👎
3
1.04%
👀
1
0.346%
👌
1
0.346%
💅
1
0.346%
💘
1
0.346%
🤔
1
0.346%
🥴
1
0.346%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FVinsights. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 February 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пересобрал свой доклад на Ecommerce Weekend (14 августа). К этому времени ситуация чуть уже успокоится, и какие-то вещи станут понятными, будет проще обсуждать риски и стратегии. Я буду говорить про возможные сценарии в зависимости от внешних факторов (потому что многие из эти сценариев мы уже проходили), а также про то, как к этим сценариям адаптироваться, и что делать прямо сейчас. Я думаю, что к 14 августа у меня …
Wildberries - это логистика, платежи, витрина (маркетинг/аудитория), финансы. Обрушение логистической инфраструктуры не означает обрушение всех частей. В мире существует достаточное количество маркетплейсов без логистики или с децентрализованной логистикой. Самый близкий пример - Kaspi, самый заметный - ebay.
Перестройка стратегии логистики для RWB означает включение в нее в первую очередь оффлайновых сетей и ТЦ, ко…
Ecomweekend этом году 13-16 августа в горах над Сочи. Я собираюсь прилететь 8 августа и в течение 3-4 дней до начала основного мероприятия делать в малых группах стратегические разборы бизнесов в текущих условиях, определяя возможности роста для каждого бизнеса персонально в ближайшие два года. Общая идея в том, что кризис у всех разный, возможности роста тоже. Мы не всегда видим эти возможности изнутри бизнеса, но о…
импульс.гуру выкатили любопытное исследование про поиск и его трансформацию.
Что там важного и почему оно любопытное кроме стандартных цифр про рост яндекс и падение гугла (неинтересно, потому что понятно, что гугл перестал заниматься Россией, и это заметно по качеству поиска), а также переносу поиска в маркетплейсы и ИИ (тоже неинтересно, потому что тренд понятен, а цифры маленькие пока).
1. Падает не поиск гугла, …
Конституционный суд обязал российские маркетплейсы блокировать товары по «обоснованным» жалобам правообладателей о контрафакте, а не просто переслать претензию продавцу и ждать решения суда, как было до сих пор. Ущерб от необоснованных жалоб потом придется взыскивать в суде.
Это случилось сегодня. И это результат того, что компания Hobby World пришла в КС с требованием разобраться с этим. И я считаю, что это очень к…
Рынок Fashion, возможно, один из самых сегодня страдающих от текущего кризиса. При этом в Fashion три слоя (массмаркет, средний и премиум с люксом) и у них троих совершенно разная ситуация, разные выводы и разные стратегии.
Премиум и люкс (они разные, и с разными стратегиями внутри, но близки друг к другу): небольшое снижение частоты покупок при одновременном приличном росте чека. За счет этого заметный рост объемов…
Митап про микросервисную архитектуру послезавтра 28 мая утром.
Этот митап я провожу вместе с EW Club, Digital Chief и К2Тех. Мы придумали способ поговорить на эту тему так, чтобы в руках у каждого участника остались в результате разговора решения, которые можно сразу применять. Поэтому в основе митапа соединение самых разных компаний со сложным и уникальным опытом и аргументами, как за, так и против.
Подать заявку н…
Влад Бакальчук сегодня - генеральный директор Мвидео-Эльдорадо.
Мвидео сейчас сложно - рынок сжимается, розница очень дорогая, закредитованность высокая, кредиты стоят конских денег.
Выхода из этого простого нет. И Влад перестраивает компанию, делая из нее маркетплейс ... вернее ... не совсем маркетплейс.
Мы вместе с Алексеем Федоровым записали Влада в подкасте "Какого?!" и обсудили:
- будущее Мвидое и планы Влада
-…
Ежегодное исследование "Интернет-торговля в России" сегодня вышло
13.4 триллиона - объем интернет-торговли (я уже это говорил). Это на полтриллиона меньше прогнозного.
Средний чек упал на 5% - это не падение продаж и не удешевление товаров, но увеличение доли заказов с маленьким чеком (один предмет в заказе, как пример)
Доля онлайн-канала в ритейле всего - 25,6%, а в непродовольственном канале - 52% (об этом я уже…
Мессенджер, который сделает автоматическую архивацию отвеченных сообщений или возможность сортировки по звездочкам / неотвеченным / помеченным к ответу - будет сильно более удобным инструментом, чем то, что есть сейчас. 120-140 диалогов 1+1 в день переползли из почты в мессенджеры, а функционала почты не появилось.
Мессенджеры заточенные по работу: Битрикс, Яндекс, Тимс - не массовые. Они хороши для общения внутри …
Final Call!
2 апреля, вечером, в Москве
Церемония вручения наград топ100 Data Insight
320 гостей - интернет-магазины, платформы продаж, бренды, селлеры... Уже приглашены и придут.
Только 20 билетов, которые можно купить (сервисам обычно) и прийти на мероприятие.
8 партнеров, брендирующих мероприятие, помогающих вручать награды.
Форма одежды - умеренно парадная: праздничное настроение - наше все. Вы меня знаете. :)…
🔥13❤1
Signed Fedor Virin
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @FVinsights. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 184,629 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Федор Вирин про рынки и цифры” (@FVinsights), 1,815 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FVinsights.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
