补充说明: source: https://b23.tv/IJRfaG2

Channel
福瑞洋葱盒
@FURRYYCH
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,576subscribers
+55 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001584683321 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FURRYYCH |
| Description | A news channel responsible for telling about Chinese furry 若您有相关Furry圈内事件材料,欢迎大家积极投稿! 投稿须知以及相关注意事项:https://t.me/furryboringnews/324 讨论组 https://t.me/+OeKRbDIeDFE0YWU9 This is a Chinese channel❗️ Это китайский канал❗️ これは中国のチャンネルです❗️ |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FURRYYCH |
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 8,576 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 8,577 | +12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 8,565 | +7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 8,558 | +10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 8,548 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 8,544 | +18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 8,526 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 8,521 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.6%
- avg views ÷ 8,576 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,250
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.351%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (2 August 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,538 |
| Reactions total | 60 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,970
- Videos
- ≈142
- Links
- ≈200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 24s
- Average length
- 4m 24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
60 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 27 | 45.0% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 43.3% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 5.00% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
2026年8月22日 Archive Number:88 #反furry吧 #凯芒 #言吾 #纠纷 8月17日,繁花flower在反furry吧内发布瓜条预告,指控bilibili知名up 凯芒KeMon(言吾) 存在背刺舰长提督,流设,pua,乱挂人等等引导粉丝网暴其舰长的行为。并描述其“死不认错,倒打一耙“在贴文下表明自身为苦主之一,并附上相关证据。 该帖文发出后或因其个人纠纷产生大量与之相同的不满/负面影响受到相关人士响应。有关账户发布大量无证据发帖占据整个反furry吧,在吧内产生互挂和讨论,反furry吧小吧主塔什卢尔就该事件发布处理公示。表示上述屠版事件超出了吧务所认可的避雷讨论贴边界,并对相关贴文清理,仅保留原贴作为原始证据。 By linmontfurry. Source: 百度贴吧-通告 百度贴吧-原始证据帖
❤3🤡1
补充说明: #官方回应 绒兽汇官方于8月17日下午在其qq群公告内对豪城参展进行了官方总结。有人点评:主办方及时收到群众响应,鼓励参展者收集相关人士违反规则的证据,为后续展会进行现场调控和风险评估树立了有效范本。并对比5月份hifurry爆发的类似事件就处理反应提出质疑。 在这一官方总结中提到,前期阶段进行风险评估,因对方并未违反有关场馆规定而没有采取限制措施。保障其参展权益。8月13日有参展成员反馈拍摄预告视频提及发放非合规物品,官方及时响应并采取劝阻和加强安保。8月14日官方完成了材料整理并报案、8月15日回收不明人员分发带有争议性个人肖像A4纸物料以避免产生争议。对相关人员进行有效管控,保障了群众的参展体验。 8月16日对相关人员因在场馆非开放时间未经允许进入拍摄正式作出禁止入场的决定,当日下午相关人员与官方人员办理退票手续,因拒绝停止拍摄现场管理人员,主办方依法报警,劝离相关人员和处置相关账号。活动宣告圆满结束,并宣…
❤8
2026年8月16日 Archive Number:87 #豪城 #兽装 #名誉权纠纷 #官方回应 #绒兽汇 #兽聚 众人拾柴火焰高 自豪城在hifurry因相关行径受到圈内大量关注后,豪城向圈内继续拍摄“小兽太的一天“为题材的视频,试图产生误导外人和引发争论,并着手打算“重蹈覆辙“来再次引发圈内人士的关注。 在这一题材视频创作之中,豪城在抖音等平台上传了相关利用“心理疾病“为主题的视频,并在态度上对圈层内的心理疾病患者进行嘲讽“开玩笑“。造成了有关人员的不适与反感。有相关人士发布视频声明:心理疾病从来不是可以用来博流量、立人设、玩噱头的素材。并指责豪城把心理疾病包装成了迎合流量的表演。 或因豪城的相关玩笑化,恶趣味视频造成了圈内人士的大量不满。出现了有关人士对其进行声讨,有人通过QQ空间有组织性的向豪城的“袋子批发商“好想来官方客服复制粘贴投诉模版,来举报豪城的有关视频。众人拾材火焰高,有关动作被好想来官方察觉审理,将…
🤡4❤2
2026年8月12日 Archive Number:86 #枫墨 #争议事件 #纠纷 #回应 8月10日,枫墨被其相关同学指控在6月利用学校实验室契机违规使用学校器材3D打印性爱玩具。并指控枫墨将上述过程发布至推特和抖音平台。在原瓜条提到:上述行为被他同实验室的学长看到并进行严厉批评教育,但东窗事发后一个月,枫墨并没认识自身错误攻击帮助过他的朋友。 枫墨回应了这一瓜条帖文。对于器材打印性玩具一事,指出打印机为实验室老师自费购买,耗材由自己提供,并且拥有机器使用权限,表述自身的合规性。在推特上发布相关内容这一事件,枫墨承认了自身存在问题,但指出墙内外分家,推止于推的说法,反而瓜条的传播扩大了事件的影响力。 枫墨指出原挂条提及的学长并非同实验室成员,并不存在“相关批评教育“的说法。并就其列举出的学长私下也存在有关成人行为。并就此进行反驳一件小事被人加入了一堆定语包装、扩散成了这一舆论事件。随后,原瓜条内容消失。发布者宣称被举报…
❤1
2026年8月9日 Archive Number:85 #贤云 #不语 #欠款 #纠纷 #财务纠纷 兽圈风云之收数王 "贤云" 被当事人指控多起失信问题。 一、兽装代购吞尾款 2024年8月,当事人出资委托贤云向A家代购兽装“焦糖”。2025年1月称兽装完工,但贤云以“毛在修改”“被拆解”等理由拒交付。2026年8月当事人向A家核实,得知最后两期尾款未结清,兽装从未发货,而当事人实际上已向贤云结清尾款,而对方所称的改毛人员实际上查无此人。 二、老赖行为 贤云与多人有未结清的资金往来,累积金额较大。 三、借用财物: 对方定制的兽装“不语”系向当事人预支“工资”,及向多人借款购得。 目前我们没有收到来自贤云的回应。 注: 兽圈人心险恶,建议谨慎借款。 by Kumatoshi source: QQ空间
🌚2
2026年8月9日 Archive Number:84 #furryboringnews #唐 #争议事件 #郑郑得证 郑郑得证是一位B站百大UP主,在B站获得“知识领域优质UP主”的称号。 近日,该UP在其B站以标题为“用人骨做福瑞情趣玩偶,圈子大佬带头‘兽交’”为题,因其题目性质猎奇,吸引关注和点击。该视频截至收稿已获得1.5万播放量。并在其哔哩哔哩专栏通过“不可过审系列”等字眼与兽圈绑定,尝试对该视频进行引流操作。 由于该视频系哔哩哔哩充电专属视频。通过某位热心人士购买后,其内容宣传大相径庭:前半部分讲的是手工爱好者 Gradendine在十几年用木头制作莎莉·橡果玩偶的故事。后半部分话题生硬的切到了2018年陷入虐待动物丑闻的前百万级YouTuber “Kero the Wolf”。视频内容完全独立、互不相干。 该UP主把国外互联网上两个风马牛不相及的事件强行缝合在了一句话的标题里,并使用了“人骨”、“兽交”这样…
🤡10❤4
2026年8月6日 Archive Number:83 #争议事件 #金泉风土记 #气人画师鲁师傅 近日,关于FVN「金泉风土记」出现了部分负面讨论,其作者“气人画师鲁师”(下称鲁师傅)在微博表示:招募赞助者还要被“挨骂”,那还是选择不做好,引起了一场激烈对峙。 茳荌在评论区指出作者并不明白“别人说这个游戏叫‘金主风土记’原因为何”、“没有认真查看steam差评与社区意见”、“没有get到被喷的点”,并表示资金不足完全可以做一个demo。 鲁师傅回应“自己接受批评和意见的前提是发出这些批评的人有能力,拒绝接受自我感受和负面情绪的‘意见’”,表示其自身不论作品好坏都是在做内容产出,“圈子变坏就是这种人致使”,随后评论这种行为实在太典,并追问为什么不退款,而是选择精神胜利。 鲁师傅最后于8月1日夜间声明游戏还是会继续做,并鼓励大家创作,并释出了后日谈的预告。当事人茳荌并未就此发表意见。 By StarNol. Sourc…
❤1
补充说明: https://ly-m.scol.com.cn/#/thread/details/3931642 福瑞八奇物志在7月25日被有关群众在“问政四川”投诉举报,指出其举办大型审批活动就是否拥有相关许可文书和相关安全设施的隐患风险提出质疑。 8月3日,成都高新公安分局回复这一投诉栏,表示相关反映的问题已经核实处理。给出的答复是该活动以依法依规报备审批,相关公安安全许可手续齐全。活动现场配备了充足警力和社会安保力量,并声明该活动圆满结束
2026年8月5日 Archive Number:82 #西诺sinuo #欺诈 #纠纷 班恩在推特上代挂画师西诺,指控其在要求的稿件长期延后稿件工期,该画师推特持续更新内容却不理睬单主的稿件请求。并提供相关信息。 班恩指出,其列表于2026年3月21日全款交付金额,画师方承诺2周左右完成。画师依次在清明节以清明节结束,4月18日以考试为由,4月27日以吃饭为由向单主延误。直到凌晨两点后再无画师音讯。 自此之后、5月1日至16日。画师动向渺无音讯,但其在推特帐号的更新产出仍未停止。由此产生争议。 By linmontfurry. Source: Twitter
❤1👍1
File, posted without a caption
❤2
2026年8月3日 Archive Number:81 #灵兽记 #兽聚 #官方回应 #争议事件 灵兽记是近期诞生的新兴兽聚,在天津举办开展相关活动。 8月1日,有人就灵兽记参展结束后,在QQ空间发表了其对于此次展会的点评。该点评指出:展会票价极高,普通票与赞助票之间的物料预备准备欠缺。并指出场控存在相关问题,外人可随意进出。游戏区无人看管和介绍等等缺陷,并附上了相关群内截图。 该点评同时指出,大合照有升降机却还要后排站在椅子上,相关场控没有监控,可能存在一些安全问题。邀请到的嘉宾因主办不提供报销差旅拒绝前往,以行程为由欺诈参展者的恶劣行径。 由此上述行为导致展方被人拆穿后,展方拒绝直面相关话题。该点评还指出普通staff拥有参展人士的重要身份信息,在其之后的道歉声明中指出其内部系统杂乱、人员身份核查无果酿成的信息泄露。staff问题在声明中说明为“撤资者”举荐而成,但整个staff团队仅2位成年人,发生问题后,以“前s…
🤡7👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @FURRYYCH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“福瑞洋葱盒” (@FURRYYCH), 8,576 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FURRYYCH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.