Posted without readable text

Channel
соль
@FUCKsaltshop
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
13,747subscribers
+2,938 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002317618773 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FUCKsaltshop |
| Description | ВОЗВРАТА ТОВАРА/СРЕДСТВ НЕТ Отправка по всей РФ/РБ/КЗ Покупка/сотрудничество: @trappaswagga Отзывы: https://t.me/otziviFUCKsaltshop Актуальное наличие: https://t.me/nalichieFUCKsaltshop ЗА РЕКЛАМУ/ВП НЕ РУЧАЮСЬ! В замерах может быть погрешность 1-3см |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FUCKsaltshop |
Topic
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 08:06 | 13,747 | +73 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:37 | 13,674 | -17 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:07 | 13,691 | +89 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:28 | 13,602 | +219 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:49 | 13,383 | +94 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:35 | 13,289 | +117 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:34 | 13,172 | -43 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:35 | 13,215 | -55 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 13,270 | -48 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:51 | 13,318 | -27 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:39 | 13,345 | +629 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:10 | 12,716 | +282 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 12,434 | +259 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:17 | 12,175 | +148 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:29 | 12,027 | +160 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:05 | 11,867 | +64 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:49 | 11,803 | +59 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 11,744 | +69 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 18:20 | 11,675 | +8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:27 | 11,667 | first reading |
Engagement
88 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.05%
- avg views ÷ 13,747 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 557
- 40 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 40
- of 88 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 88 (4 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 22,297 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 19:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,680
- Videos
- ≈23
- Links
- ≈113
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 87 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FUCKsaltshop. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 88 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (2.50%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Attitude Gold jeans Невероятно яркие олдскульные джинсы Attitude Gold с массивным дизайном и характерной эстетикой Y2K. выполнены из темно-серого денима с красивыми винтажными фейдами. главная особенность пары — огромные крылья на задней части, выполненные в контрастных белых и зеленых оттенках. на обоих задних карманах расположены крупные золотистые геральдические лилии, которые также повторяются спереди. дизайн д…
Southpole jeans Олдскульные джинсы Southpole из коллекции Red Tab в темно-синем цвете с красивыми сероватыми фейдами и контрастной светлой строчкой пара выполнена в широком бэгги фите с массивными штанинами, характерном для рэп и хип-хоп культуры 2000-х, темный деним с плавными высветлениями создает красивый винтажный эффект, а светлая строчка подчеркивает конструкцию джинсов сзади расположены крупные карманы с гор…
Artful Dodger jeans Невероятно красивые олдскульные джинсы Artful Dodger с ярким оформлением и фирменной эстетикой бренда. выполнены из темно-синего денима с аккуратными естественными фейдами и контрастной золотистой строчкой. главная особенность пары — два массивных задних кармана, полностью украшенных разноцветной вышивкой. на них расположены корабельный штурвал, декоративные узоры, надписи и множество мелких эле…
COOGI jeans Невероятно яркие олдскульные джинсы COOGI с массивным дизайном и красивым сочетанием темного денима с золотистыми и белыми элементами. спереди расположены декоративные вышивки, золотистая фурнитура и контрастные белые шлевки, которые отлично выделяются на фоне темной ткани. деним имеет аккуратные высветления и естественные заломы, придающие паре винтажный характер. главная особенность джинсов — огромна…
Southpole jeans Очень красивые олдскульные джинсы Southpole из линейки Cream Tab, выполненные в необычном коричнево-сером оттенке с выраженным винтажным эффектом. по всей поверхности расположены плавные светлые фейды, которые отлично сочетаются с темной основой денима. особого внимания заслуживают задние карманы с многослойной контрастной строчкой в бежевых, оранжевых и бордовых оттенках. фирменный кожаный патч Cre…
Southpole jeans Олдскульные джинсы Southpole из коллекции Black Tab в красивом светло-голубом цвете с выразительными естественными фейдами и характерной винтажной текстурой денима главная особенность пары — невероятно красивые высветления, плавно переходящие от насыщенного голубого оттенка к светлым участкам практически по всей длине штанин. свободный бэгги фит с широкими штанинами создает массивный силуэт в лучших…
Southpole jeans Олдскульные джинсы Southpole в насыщенном темно-синем цвете с невероятно красивыми и агрессивными фейдами, которые создают яркий контраст с основным оттенком денима и придают паре выразительный винтажный вид главная особенность джинсов — массивные высветления с легким желтоватым оттенком, проходящие практически по всей передней и задней части штанин. особенно красиво смотрятся горизонтальные заломы …
Southpole jeans Олдскульные джинсы Southpole из коллекции Yellow Tab в насыщенном синем цвете с невероятно красивыми светлыми фейдами, которые создают выразительный контраст с основным оттенком денима и придают паре характерный винтажный вид модель выполнена в широком прямом фите с просторными штанинами и достаточно большим выходом, благодаря чему джинсы формируют массивный силуэт в лучших традициях рэп-стиля 2000-…
Southpole jeans Олдскульные джинсы Southpole в насыщенном темно-синем цвете с красивыми естественными фейдами и широким силуэтом, идеально передающие эстетику рэп-денима 2000-х годов главная особенность пары — необычное асимметричное оформление задней части. на одном кармане расположена массивная фирменная графика Southpole с готическими элементами и гербовой символикой, а второй выполнен в более минималистичном ст…
Artful Dodger jeans Необычная пара Artful Dodger в темно-графитовом цвете с красивыми винтажными высветлениями и нестандартным оформлением. главная особенность джинсов — асимметричный дизайн задних карманов. один украшен темной готической вышивкой, второй — контрастной серебристой композицией, которая продолжается на штанине в виде цепочек и декоративных элементов. спереди также расположены вышитая цепь и узор, доп…
⬇️Новые дропы едут и едут, выставил True Religion, Dodeca, Southpole и другие пары на предзаказ Канал с предзаказами здесь: https://t.me/PREORDERsaltshop
Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @FUCKsaltshop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@FUCKsaltshop edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 3 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 10 posts on @FUCKsaltshop as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 7 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 29 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@treshaksk8 · 15,2707 postsCROIX rouge (Круа)
@croixxrouge · 11,8635 postsЖИР SHOP
@fattarchive · 9,3065 postsdsvstore
@dsvstore · 8,4344 postsНаличие FUCKsaltshop
@nalichieFUCKsaltshop · 3,1084 postsсписок продавцов тг.
@blackwhiteimages · 73,5673 postsMerrell.Market
@MerrellMarket · 17,0383 postsNever Shop
@neveershop · 11,2883 postssamp.shmot
@samp_shmot · 8,6813 postsархивчик
@archivchiki · 36,3662 postsDopeWearClothes
@dopewearclothess · 12,9072 posts00x.wear
@wear00x · 7,9272 postsBREAKWEST STORE
@BreakWestStore · 2,7311 postciel ®
@cieldemain · 11,3861 postDeath_shop🩸
@Death_sh0p · 2,4331 postFlava Company
@flavacompany · 3,8561 postМаксим Дисишузов
@Maksim_Disishuzov · 11,1941 postпризы биг гив
@prizesbiggive · 281 postsartorial mood
@sartorialmood · 3,6711 postSKLAD
@sklad_immoral · 10,3081 postСПАЙСИКЛОФ 🥩
@spicycloths · 2,2221 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@nalichieFUCKsaltshop · 3,10819 postsGiveShareBot - бот для розыгрышей
@GiveShareBot · 762,9046 postsTRUE соль
@truesaltshop · 3,3106 postsсписок продавцов тг.
@blackwhiteimages · 73,5673 postsdsvstore
@dsvstore · 8,4343 postsCONDUCTOR EVOLVING
@KIM4IKSHOP · 30,3523 postsMercurystore
@mercurystor · 2,8073 postsNever Shop
@neveershop · 11,2883 postsRegaStore
@reggastoree · 3,0773 postssugar giveaway☠️
@sugargiveaway · 2743 posts00x.wear
@wear00x · 7,9273 postsACTAVIS STORE
@actavisstore · 12,7012 postsсписок продавцов тг. отзывы.
@blackwhiteimagesfeed · 1,6721 postBoge’s Nothing Superfluous
@BogesNothingSuperfluous · 6,0981 postДЖИ 82 / G82 STORE
@g82store · 15,2461 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“соль” (@FUCKsaltshop), 13,747 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FUCKsaltshop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.