Channel
@FTUreview
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,192subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001448739901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FTUreview |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FTUreview |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 8,192 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 8,196 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 8,202 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 8,201 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 8,201 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
613 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 571 | 93.1% | |
| 👎 | 42 | 6.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 613reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2025 to 19 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Guruprasad academy (telugu ) 1lakh course fee Content: Banknifty future intraday trading He gives excel sheet ,to input previous day open high close details to get buy & sell levels for next day He doesn't disclose the formula of excel sheet After drawing that levels on chart, i have observed that , he changed the camarilla pivot values a bit He claims that in long run , this strategy gives @ 36% cagr I have …
👍67👎9
If you’d like to share a course review, please send it to @FTUreviewBot. Your identity will remain anonymous. One honest review from you can help others avoid falling into the trap of fake gurus.
👍10👎4
Review about IBBM Advanced Options Course (74,990 INR) Whatever they teach is widely available on Internet and YouTube. They explain about Delta, how delta works, other greeks etc. There are better videos available on Internet for the same; you don’t need to pay a single dime. Even on Udemy you can get full fledge options course during discount time around 500 rupees only. They just used fancy words like Delta tra…
👍61👎2
Posted without readable text
Three guys in a trading group decide to pursue three different courses. A starts with a course called Breadsticks. B applies for a course called Taco. And C takes a course called Brownie. All of them gave their best efforts and time to complete it on time. Now it's time for practice, they started doing back-testing and they are very happy with the result. As per the back-testing data, all three courses have an ave…
👍57👎6
If you’d like to share a course review, please send it to @FTUreviewBot. Your identity will remain anonymous. One honest review from you can help others avoid falling into the trap of fake gurus.
👍4👎2
A young trader in his early 20s, a genuine trader, not some furu clown, just ended his life. One of his last posts said it all. https://x.com/4500px/status/1960060654276292957 And that’s why I fucking hate these so-called furus. The ones who flash selective PnL screenshots, sell “mentorships” in shady Telegram groups, and push bullshit like “2 months mein saare loss recover kar loge”, “97% accuracy strategy”. Th…
👍37👎2
Want to help others avoid scammers or low-quality courses? Share your honest course reviews with @FTUreviewBot. Your feedback can save fellow learners from getting scammed by greedy course creators!"
👎2👍1
I purchased price action SMC institutional trading course by mindfluential trading for 5699. Trust me course is not at all worth the price. I had joined mainly for indicator alerts and charts. Mentor himself is completely inactive. I had posted a honest comment about mentorship and they even deleted the comment. The fact is they don't provide any alters! They say alter system is lag and he himself says he doesn't use…
👍39👎2
Want to help others avoid scammers or low-quality courses? Share your honest course reviews with @FTUreviewBot. Your feedback can save fellow learners from getting scammed by greedy course creators!"
My Honest Review on TechAstro Group & Stockgini Premium Group (Sachin & Prakhar Dixit Mentorship) I joined their so-called “Astro-based stock market mentorship” and paid ₹25,000 — but honestly, it’s not even worth ₹25. 🔴 Here’s what I experienced: * Most stock ideas were copied from other mentors or public groups — nothing original or astrology-based as promised. * They claim everything is based on astrology, but …
👍37👎4
Want to help others avoid scammers or low-quality courses? Share your honest course reviews with @FTUreviewBot. Your feedback can save fellow learners from getting scammed by greedy course creators!"
👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FTUreview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FTU Course Reviews” (@FTUreview), 8,192 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FTUreview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.