Channel
@FSLBHCB
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,643subscribers
-24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001897755867 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FSLBHCB |
| Created | Between 1 November 2022 and 30 June 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FSLBHCB |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 3,643 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 3,653 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 3,666 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 3,667 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 3,667 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 21 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
27 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 55.6% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 44.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2025 to 26 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
艺名: #小雅 价格: #D1 500P 1000PP 地址: #南海 #金沙洲 万达 私聊: @ttopk23 频道: https://t.me/sjshs00644 状态: #已视频验证 标签: #嫩妹 #舌吻 报告： 备注:8月24号，学生反馈被骗定金，莉莉正在联系老师，如48小时内不回复处理，就拉黑下榜。 后缀:8月26号，联邦已垫付给被骗群友100元定金，永久拉黑下榜。
❤4
===== 评论区 =====
艺名: #苏酥 价格: #D2 600P 1300PP 地址: #南海 #桂城 私聊: 频道: 状态: #已视频验证 标签: #舌吻 #69式 #毒龙 报告： 备注：4.16有群友反馈老师骗定，4.20零点前老师无回应处理拉黑下榜。
❤4👍1
艺名: #乐乐 价格: #D2 800P 1500PP 地址: #顺德 #大良 私聊: @xtt664488 频道: @fs_lele 状态: #已视频验证 标签: #69式 #洗吹做 ❌❌❌违反联邦禁止五套行为，拉黑下榜踢出群聊 账号id: 7892215556
👍5
===== 评论区 ===== 黄景瑜: 又是在中介频道看到的？
===== 评论区 ===== 小时候很白 曾: 这个不是挺活跃的嘛 上岸了 还是转战阵地了 那种心情烦躁烦躁的时候突然觉得...: 这个垃圾的很，花钱还得伺候她
===== 评论区 =====
👍5❤2
艺名: #羊洋 原 #婉婷 价格: #D2 700P 1300PP 地址: #南海 #大沥 私聊: @caihong364 @xiantao258 频道: t.me/yangyang3645 状态: #已视频验证 标签: #69式 #舌吻 点击 报告区 ，看老师全部报告。 经核实，该老师在中介和非电报渠道接无套，下榜。
👍4❤2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @FSLBHCB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@FSLBHCB named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“广州佛山联邦黑车榜” (@FSLBHCB), 3,643 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FSLBHCB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.