https://t.me/UKGOLDTRADERSCOMMUNITY join my channel now i have stopped giving signals here and sharing my ideas on my new group

Channel
Free Signals Group
@FREESIGNALSGROUP12
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
72subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001646251094 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FREESIGNALSGROUP12 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FREESIGNALSGROUP12 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 72 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 73 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 74 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 74 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
16 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 11 | 68.8% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 6.25% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 6.25% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2023 to 2 October 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Gold next possible move Retested the broken level of 1950-56 is also eyed Rejection here might get back us to 1940-38 If broken the support of 1940-38 We might see a long term bears attack 1920-1900 is possible after a break of 1940-38
More than 1000 Pips target 300 Pips stop loss Use proper risk management
GBPJPY Daily Timeframe GBPJPY is flying for months now As u can see it has reached to the resistance of the rising channel I see a drop towards the strong support In near term
Asalamualikom everyone Hope everyone is fine
Here’s another confirmation for BTCUSD Short positions We’ve broken the support and retested it clean and nicely Ready to continue it’s dumping If there is no fake moves👍
👍3❤1👎1
BTCUSD is expected to fall really hard If we look at the technicals BTCUSD on Daily looks like starting it’s bears move towards the psychological level which is 23k As u can see the ranging phases i’ve shared above in the chart We’ve broken below and closed below the range which indicates Bears are in control It has broken and retraced for a better selling opportunity
Photo, posted without a caption
Gold 80 Pips profit Alhamulilah
Gold 70 Pips Profit
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3
Gold TP1 Hit 60 Pips profit
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FREESIGNALSGROUP12. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Free Signals Group” (@FREESIGNALSGROUP12), 72 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FREESIGNALSGROUP12.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.