Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Spectrum

Channel

Spectrum

@FPPPJ

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

57subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001528330691
TypeChannel
Username@FPPPJ
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FPPPJ

Growth

55575613 August 2026 — 55 subscribers14 August 2026 — 55 subscribers27 August 2026 — 57 subscribers13 August 202627 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 14 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55–57 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 07:5757+2
14 Aug 2026, 00:2655no change
13 Aug 2026, 09:3255first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔642.9%
custom 5086826074151584606535.7%
17.14%
😢17.14%
😭17.14%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2024 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FPPPJ. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 December 2024 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 02:54 UTC111 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

لا تلوم سبكتروم اذا رجع وناك امك

😭1

Signed ʟᴜᴄᴀs

17 Jul 2026, 02:53 UTC111 viewsread 13 August 2026

كس امك يا ديوث يا عديم الشخصيه @UJJJY

Signed ʟᴜᴄᴀs

17 Jul 2026, 02:53 UTC111 viewsread 13 August 2026

هههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههه

Signed ʟᴜᴄᴀs

16 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC115 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

الحلم تصير زي سبكتروم انسان مثقف كبير عاقل بس لا ي ابن الشرموطه صرت ابن حرام ديوث عديم شخصية عديم حياة متكي بالتلي تنتحل الناس يا جرار @UJJJY

1

Signed نياف عسير

16 Jul 2026, 19:50 UTC115 viewsread 13 August 2026

تبيني الحين انيك لك امك يا ورع القحبة ولا وش يا ديوث ليه منتحل تعال علمني ي ابن القحبة @UJJJY

Signed نياف عسير

16 Jul 2026, 19:50 UTC113 viewsread 13 August 2026

@UJJJY يلعن امك مغولي انت تنتحل خوينا يا جرار يا عديم الشخصية يا ورع القحبة

Signed نياف عسير

16 Jul 2026, 19:49 UTC112 viewsread 13 August 2026

@UJJJY هيه سلامات ي ابن الجرارين منتحل خوينا ؟؟

Signed نياف عسير

21 Jul 2025, 17:40 UTC≈1,250 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

بالحساب ذا يا سبكتروم

😢1

Signed كثر الغلا غيرك يا جرار

5 Jun 2025, 13:39 UTC≈1,370 views3 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Video

God help you my poor heart

💔3

Signed Spectrum

2 Jun 2025, 18:11 UTC≈1,400 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

كس امكم ي عيال القحبه اطلعو من القناه م لي خلق احذفكم واحد واحد

💔3

Signed Spectrum

3 Dec 2024, 13:00 UTC≈2,040 viewsread 13 August 2026

قناتي الثانيه شوفها تعال انت ونمر هناك

Signed نياف

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FPPPJ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 813,817 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Spectrum” (@FPPPJ), 57 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FPPPJ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.