Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FPLUzbekistan

Channel

FPLUzbekistan

@FPLUzbekistan

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,065subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001844128799
TypeChannel
Username@FPLUzbekistan
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FPLUzbekistan

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

3,700 average views per post against 1,065 subscribers — an engagement rate of 347.6%. Across the 1,068 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,002–3,161 subscribers, posting mainly in Turkish — the middle half sit between 9.77% and 43.5%, with a median of 23.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (19 July 2026 18 August 2026)
Posts measured17 of 17 published in the window (14 exact, 3 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled62,930
Mature posts only81.6% over 15 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers1,065 measured 18 August 2026
Cohortb1000:tur · 1,068 channels · p10 4.99% · p25 9.77% · p50 23.1% · p75 43.5% · p90 71.6%
Position in cohort99.438th percentile · 15.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.275% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageTurkish · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 18 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

1,0371,0651,05117 Aug 2026, 11:30 — 1,037 subscribers18 Aug 2026, 10:57 — 1,065 subscribers17 Aug 2026, 11:3018 Aug 2026, 10:57
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,033–1,069 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 10:571,065+28
17 Aug 2026, 11:301,037first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
347.6%
avg views ÷ 1,065 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,700
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.167%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held17 (1 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total62,930
Reactions total105
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

105 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5754.3%
1615.2%
🔥1615.2%
👎54.76%
🤔54.76%
🤷‍♂32.86%
👏21.90%
😁10.952%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 04:09 UTC≈49,300 views9 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🎉 FPLUzbekistan yangi 2026/27 yilgi mavsumni boshlamoqda! 🇺🇿 O‘zbekistonlik FPL menejerlarini birlashtiruvchi eng faol hamjamiyatlardan biriga qo‘shiling! 🏆 O’tgan mavsumning O‘zbekiston chempionlari ham FPLUzbekistan hamjamiyati a’zolari! ⚽ Bu yerda siz: 📊 FPL bo‘yicha statistika va analitikalarni kuzatasiz 💡 Tajribali menejerlardan fikr va maslahatlar olasiz 🔥 Boshqa o‘zbekistonlik FPL menejerlari bilan raqobatl

🔥72

16 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC601 views2 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Mavsum starti oldidan oʼtkaziladigan Community Shield uchun City va Arsenal jamoalarining asosiy tarkiblari eʼlon qilindi. Bu tarkiblar koʼpchilikka mavsum starti oldidan paydo boʼlayotgan savollariga javob boʼladi. @FPLUzbekistan

1👍1

14 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC709 views4 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🚨 Maresca Haaland haqida: U yaxshi edi (payshanba kungi mashg‘ulotdan keyin). Tovonining orqa qismida biroz noqulaylik bor edi, ammo u yaxshi holatda edi. Hujumchi kecha Manchester Cityning muxlislar uchun ochiq bo‘lgan mashg‘ulotining so‘nggi bir necha daqiqasida mashg‘ulotni tark etgan edi. @FPLUzbekistan

👍4

12 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC869 views9 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🚨 Maʼlumotlarga koʼra, Elliot Anderson, Marc Guehi, Nico O'Reilly, Rayan Cherki, Jeremy Doku, va Erling Haalandlar bugun Manchester City mashgʼulotiga qaytishgan. Nima deb oʼylaysiz, 11 kundan soʼng boʼladigan Bournemouth bilan oʼyinda Haalandni asosiy tarkibda maydonga tushish ehtimoli qanday? @FPLUzbekistan

🤔5🔥31

12 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC877 views4 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Rasman: Pep Chavarría Chelsea futbolchisi! @FPLUzbekistan

1👍1🔥1😁1

11 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC837 views4 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Rasman: Brennaan Johnson Everton, Dwight McNeil esa Crystall Palace futbolchisi! @FPLUzbekistan

🔥31

10 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC793 views8 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Rasman: Ronald Araujo Liverpool futbolchisi! @FPLUzbekistan

🤷‍♂3👍2👏21

10 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC763 views4 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Jamoalarning standartlarini amalga oshiruvchi o'yinchilarning dastlabki ro'yxati. Sizningcha qaysi futbolchini olish shart? @FPLUzbekistan

2👍2

8 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC819 views3 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Rasman: Bruno Guimarães Arsenal futbolchisi! @FPLUzbekistan

🔥21

7 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC856 views2 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Siz jamoangizga £8.5-7.5mlik yarim himoyachilar qidiryabsizmi? Quyida eng ishonchli boʼlgan variantlarni koʼrib chiqamiz Antoine Semenyo (£8.5m) Oʼtgan mavsum: 17 gol, 6 assist Yangi murabbiy kelganiga qaramay Semenyoni oʼyindagi roli, hujumdagi xavflilik darajasi kamayib qolgani yoʼq. Aksincha Enzo Mareska uslubida qanot oʼyinchilari orqali oʼynash asosiy ustuvor gʼoya hisoblanadi. Jamoa oʼyinchilari ham intervyu

👍2

6 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC826 views7 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🚨Rasman: James Trafford Leeds futbolchisi! @FPLUzbekistan

👍61

5 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC686 views2 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🚨 Rasman: Newcastle Mathias Jaissleni bosh murabbiy deb eʼlon qildi! @FPLUzbekistan

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @FPLUzbekistan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 362,779 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FPLUzbekistan” (@FPLUzbekistan), 1,065 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FPLUzbekistan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.