Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FPF | The Plumbing of Money

Channel

FPF | The Plumbing of Money

@FPFplumbing

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

512subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002051052158
TypeChannel
Username@FPFplumbing
Created3 March 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FPFplumbing

Growth

5125185157 August 2026 — 518 subscribers8 August 2026 — 518 subscribers15 August 2026 — 516 subscribers21 August 2026 — 512 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 511–519 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 13:18512-4
15 Aug 2026, 01:04516-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:03518no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:25518first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 3 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.6%
avg views ÷ 512 subscribers
Avg views / post
167
1 post measured
Reaction rate
10.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held11 (3 March 20244 August 2026)
Views total167
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

234 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10544.9%
👏7230.8%
👍4217.9%
62.56%
52.14%
🤔41.71%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2024 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC167 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥6👏5👍42

13 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC255 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥18👏17👍122

9 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC318 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#1season/eps.3⬛️ Кто покупает весь долг США Введение Когда говорят о государственном долге США, чаще всего звучит один и тот же вопрос: Кто вообще покупает все эти облигации? Популярный ответ прост. Китай. Япония. Федеральная резервная система. Но сегодня эта картина давно устарела. Американский госдолг покупают не только государства, но и банки, пенсионные фонды, страховые компании, фонды денежного рынка, иностран

🔥12👏5👍21

6 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC330 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#1season/eps.2⬛️ Почему Treasuries стали мировыми деньгами Почему весь мир использует долг одной страны как основу финансовой системы? Введение Если спросить, что такое государственные облигации США, большинство ответит: Это долг Америки. Формально — да. Но в современной финансовой системе Treasuries давно перестали быть просто способом занять деньги для бюджета. Сегодня это фундамент мировой ликвидности. Их исполь

🔥1321

2 Jul 2026, 19:44 UTC404 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#1season/eps.1⬛️ Почему Repo — сердце мировой финансовой системы Введение Большинство инвесторов считает, что деньги попадают на рынок через Федеральную резервную систему. ФРС снижает ставки.Запускает QE. Печатает деньги. Рынок растёт. В целом логично. Но эта картина неполная. Потому что между ФРС и рынком существует огромная инфраструктура, через которую ежедневно проходят триллионы долларов. И именно она определя

🔥21👏7👍61

1 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC846 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Season I — 02.07.2026 The Plumbing of Money 10 эпизодов о том, как на самом деле работает мировая финансовая система.

🔥14🤔3

30 Jun 2026, 20:20 UTC≈1,000 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Этот канал — исследовательское дополнение к основному проекту: пространство для длинных исследований о макроэкономике, денежной системе, институтах, геополитике и других механизмах, формирующих современный мир. Здесь приоритет — понимание системы, а не поиск быстрых ответов. Рынок — это поверхность. Мы разбираем систему под ним. Understand the pipes. Understand the flow.

👏13👍3🤔1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @FPFplumbing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 422,363 of 1,585,381entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FPF | The Plumbing of Money” (@FPFplumbing), 512 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FPFplumbing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.