Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐“ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐š ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท

Channel

๐“ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐š ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท

@FIXEDGYA

2 usernames

On this record: Topic ยท Previous handles ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry

32,718subscribers

-322 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 31,623โ€“100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001558453466
TypeChannel
Usernames@FIXEDGYA @LAHMGYA
Descriptionโšซ๏ธ แดษดสŸส ษขแดแด… ษชs แด‹ษชษดษข ๐Ÿ“ฟ ๐Ÿคฒ
Created15 July 2023 โ€” measured โ€” dated from the channelโ€™s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held31
On Telegramt.me/FIXEDGYA

Topic

Gambling & betting โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@FIXEDGYA was previously reachable at these 3 handles, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today โ€” only that this channel no longer does.

@GOTZEGYA
held 31 August 2026 โ€“ 31 August 2026
@RONGIERGYA
held 14 August 2026 โ€“ 14 August 2026
@ELBOUADIGYA
held 10 August 2026 โ€“ 10 August 2026

Growth

32,66333,27132,96710 August 2026 โ€” 33,040 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 33,130 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 33,219 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 33,271 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 33,116 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 33,070 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 33,073 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 33,081 subscribers21 August 2026 โ€” 33,033 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 32,963 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 32,908 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 32,945 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 32,891 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 32,796 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 32,789 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 32,753 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 32,663 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 32,663 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 32,674 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 32,723 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 32,771 subscribers3 September 2026 โ€” 32,794 subscribers6 September 2026 โ€” 32,834 subscribers9 September 2026 โ€” 32,932 subscribers11 September 2026 โ€” 32,884 subscribers13 September 2026 โ€” 32,840 subscribers15 September 2026 โ€” 32,738 subscribers15 September 2026 โ€” 32,738 subscribers17 September 2026 โ€” 32,743 subscribers19 September 2026 โ€” 32,722 subscribers25 September 2026 โ€” 32,718 subscribers32,71810 August 202625 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 46 days, net -322. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 32,572โ€“33,362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 01:5032,718-4
19 Sept 2026, 17:3832,722-21
17 Sept 2026, 04:2032,743+5
15 Sept 2026, 14:5732,738no change
15 Sept 2026, 14:4732,738-102
13 Sept 2026, 15:2132,840-44
11 Sept 2026, 20:5932,884-48
9 Sept 2026, 08:1632,932+98
6 Sept 2026, 03:0032,834+40
3 Sept 2026, 21:2132,794+23
2 Sept 2026, 15:3432,771+48
1 Sept 2026, 14:5832,723+49
31 Aug 2026, 17:0432,674+11
31 Aug 2026, 15:1532,663no change
31 Aug 2026, 15:0132,663-90
30 Aug 2026, 01:4832,753-36
28 Aug 2026, 23:2732,789-7
28 Aug 2026, 01:2432,796-95
26 Aug 2026, 22:1332,891-54
26 Aug 2026, 00:2332,945first reading

Engagement

425 posts held, back to 15 July 2023 โ€” the reader has reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 61 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
2.76%
avg views รท 32,718 subscribers
Avg views / post
902
175 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.38%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
205
of 425 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 63 of 175 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held425 (15 July 2023 โ€“ 24 September 2026)
Views total157,906
Reactions total3,501
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 08:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7,290 reactions across 115 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค5,06469.5%
๐Ÿ”ฅ5427.43%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4656.38%
๐Ÿคฉ1101.51%
๐Ÿ˜ฑ1081.48%
๐Ÿ‘991.36%
โœ931.28%
๐Ÿฅฐ921.26%
๐Ÿซก911.25%
๐Ÿ’ฏ741.02%
๐Ÿค741.02%
๐ŸŽ‰690.947%
๐Ÿพ490.672%
๐Ÿ‘460.631%
๐Ÿ‘Œ440.604%
๐Ÿค—400.549%
๐Ÿ’Š330.453%
๐Ÿ†’310.425%
๐Ÿ“280.384%
๐Ÿ™280.384%
7 further kinds1101.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 117 of the 425 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 7,290 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 425 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2023 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 367 we hold a reading for ยท 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @FIXEDGYA. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 425 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2023 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 07:46 UTCviews โ€”

๐“ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐š ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท pinned a photo

24 Sept 2026, 07:42 UTC161 viewsread 24 September 2026

WTF ๐Ÿ˜’ Why low Reaction?๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿป ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿพโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ’”

Signed ๐“ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐š ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท

24 Sept 2026, 06:26 UTC440 views40 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Let's ๐Ÿ”ฅGo Stake! Todays Free Information โค๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‘

โค30โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿพ1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿค—1๐Ÿคฉ1๐Ÿ˜ฑ1

Signed ๐“ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐š ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท

23 Sept 2026, 22:00 UTCโ‰ˆ1,930 views133 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿ˜ฏโญ๏ธ GOD IS GOOD โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’ฏ UNMUTE ๐Ÿ”Š๐Ÿคฏ NOW !!! BOOOOM KABOOM ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿฅ‚๐Ÿฅ‚

โค116โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿคฉ3๐Ÿพ1๐ŸŽ‰1๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

Signed ๐“ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐š ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท

23 Sept 2026, 20:26 UTCโ‰ˆ2,440 views213 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Let's ๐Ÿ”ฅGo Stake! Todays Free Information โค๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‘

โค193๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐Ÿ˜4๐Ÿฅฐ3๐ŸŽ‰2โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ’ฏ1

Signed ๐“ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐š ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท

23 Sept 2026, 07:40 UTCviews โ€”

๐… ๐จ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐š ๐ง ๐Ÿ”ฅ pinned a photo

23 Sept 2026, 07:36 UTCviews โ€”

๐… ๐จ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐š ๐ง ๐Ÿ”ฅ pinned a photo

23 Sept 2026, 07:36 UTC129 viewsread 23 September 2026

Reactโค๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‘†

Signed ๐… ๐จ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐š ๐ง ๐Ÿ”ฅ

23 Sept 2026, 07:36 UTC128 views15 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Let's ๐Ÿ”ฅGo Stake! Todays Free Information โค๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‘

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ5โค4๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿพ1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿคฉ1๐Ÿฅฐ1

Signed ๐… ๐จ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐š ๐ง ๐Ÿ”ฅ

22 Sept 2026, 07:20 UTCviews โ€”

๐… ๐จ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐š ๐ง ๐Ÿ”ฅ pinned a photo

22 Sept 2026, 07:20 UTC158 viewsread 22 September 2026

Fuck๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿฟโ€โ™‚๏ธno one react๐Ÿ’”๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿฅฒ๐Ÿ‘†๐Ÿ‘†

Signed ๐… ๐จ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐š ๐ง ๐Ÿ”ฅ

21 Sept 2026, 23:27 UTC979 views65 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Let's ๐Ÿ”ฅGo Stake! Todays Free Information โค๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‘

โค50โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ3โœ2๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿ†’2๐Ÿ‘พ1๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿค—1

Signed ๐… ๐จ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐š ๐ง ๐Ÿ”ฅ

Showing the 12 most recent of 425 posts we hold for @FIXEDGYA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐“ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐š ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ทโ€ (@FIXEDGYA), 32,718 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FIXEDGYA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.