๐ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐ ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐ซ๐ท pinned a photo

Channel
๐ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐ ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐ซ๐ท
@FIXEDGYA
On this record: Topic ยท Previous handles ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
32,718subscribers
-322 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 31,623โ100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001558453466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @FIXEDGYA @LAHMGYA |
| Description | โซ๏ธ แดษดสส ษขแดแด ษชs แดษชษดษข ๐ฟ ๐คฒ |
| Created | 15 July 2023 โ measured โ dated from the channelโs first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FIXEDGYA |
Topic
Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@FIXEDGYA was previously reachable at these 3 handles, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today โ only that this channel no longer does.
held 31 August 2026 โ 31 August 2026
held 14 August 2026 โ 14 August 2026
held 10 August 2026 โ 10 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:50 | 32,718 | -4 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 32,722 | -21 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 32,743 | +5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 32,738 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:47 | 32,738 | -102 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 32,840 | -44 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 32,884 | -48 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 32,932 | +98 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 32,834 | +40 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 32,794 | +23 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:34 | 32,771 | +48 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 32,723 | +49 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 32,674 | +11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 32,663 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 32,663 | -90 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 32,753 | -36 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 32,789 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 32,796 | -95 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 32,891 | -54 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 32,945 | first reading |
Engagement
425 posts held, back to 15 July 2023 โ the reader has reached the start of this channelโs public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 61 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR ยท 30 days
- 2.76%
- avg views รท 32,718 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 902
- 175 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.38%
- reactions รท views ยท ER floor
- Posts in window
- 205
- of 425 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 63 of 175 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 425 (15 July 2023 โ 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 157,906 |
| Reactions total | 3,501 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 08:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
7,290 reactions across 115 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 5,064 | 69.5% | |
| ๐ฅ | 542 | 7.43% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 465 | 6.38% | |
| ๐คฉ | 110 | 1.51% | |
| ๐ฑ | 108 | 1.48% | |
| ๐ | 99 | 1.36% | |
| โ | 93 | 1.28% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 92 | 1.26% | |
| ๐ซก | 91 | 1.25% | |
| ๐ฏ | 74 | 1.02% | |
| ๐ค | 74 | 1.02% | |
| ๐ | 69 | 0.947% | |
| ๐พ | 49 | 0.672% | |
| ๐ | 46 | 0.631% | |
| ๐ | 44 | 0.604% | |
| ๐ค | 40 | 0.549% | |
| ๐ | 33 | 0.453% | |
| ๐ | 31 | 0.425% | |
| ๐ | 28 | 0.384% | |
| ๐ | 28 | 0.384% | |
| 7 further kinds | 110 | 1.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 117 of the 425 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 7,290 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 425 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2023 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 7
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 6
- of 367 we hold a reading for ยท 2%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @FIXEDGYA. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 425 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2023 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
WTF ๐ Why low Reaction?๐๐ป ๐คฆ๐พโโ๏ธ๐
Signed ๐ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐ ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐ซ๐ท
Let's ๐ฅGo Stake! Todays Free Information โค๏ธ๐ฅ๐
โค30โคโ๐ฅ2๐ฅ2๐พ1๐1๐ค1๐คฉ1๐ฑ1
Signed ๐ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐ ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐ซ๐ท
๐ฅ๐ฏโญ๏ธ GOD IS GOOD โค๏ธโ๐ฅ๐ฏ UNMUTE ๐๐คฏ NOW !!! BOOOOM KABOOM ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ
โค116โคโ๐ฅ6๐คฉ3๐พ1๐1๐1๐ฏ1๐ฅ1
Signed ๐ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐ ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐ซ๐ท
Let's ๐ฅGo Stake! Todays Free Information โค๏ธ๐ฅ๐
โค193๐ฅ5๐4๐ฅฐ3๐2โคโ๐ฅ1๐1๐ฏ1
Signed ๐ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐ ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐ซ๐ท
๐ ๐จ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ง ๐ฅ pinned a photo
๐ ๐จ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ง ๐ฅ pinned a photo
Reactโค๏ธ๐ฅ๐
Signed ๐ ๐จ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ง ๐ฅ
Let's ๐ฅGo Stake! Todays Free Information โค๏ธ๐ฅ๐
โคโ๐ฅ5โค4๐ฅ2๐พ1๐1๐คฉ1๐ฅฐ1
Signed ๐ ๐จ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ง ๐ฅ
๐ ๐จ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ง ๐ฅ pinned a photo
Fuck๐คฆ๐ฟโโ๏ธno one react๐๐ก๐ฅฒ๐๐
Signed ๐ ๐จ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ง ๐ฅ
Let's ๐ฅGo Stake! Todays Free Information โค๏ธ๐ฅ๐
โค50โคโ๐ฅ3โ2๐2๐2๐พ1๐ฏ1๐ค1
Signed ๐ ๐จ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ง ๐ฅ
Showing the 12 most recent of 425 posts we hold for @FIXEDGYA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@fundegghgfdkkkhg ยท 30,9825 posts๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐
@ELFARUQ3 ยท 59,4804 postsEL NAGGER ๐ฐ๐ผ
@ELNAGGER11 ยท 62,7644 posts๐ด๐ป ๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐
@El_Mohamed_001 ยท 22,0863 posts๐ฌ๐ท OLIVER ๐ฌ๐ท
@King_Oliver_11 ยท 5,0273 postsMEHAK
@MEHAKTHK ยท 40,0783 posts๐ด๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐ //
@SPOTWAY_001 ยท 5,8103 posts๐ธ๐ฆ ZUBINA ๐ธ๐ฆ
@zubinabet ยท 31,9382 posts๐จ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ด๐๐ ๐ด
@Astone_max ยท 6,0121 post๐๐๐๐ดโโ ๏ธ
@bet356gy ยท 26,8171 post๐๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ ยฅ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ง
@CeDrIc_BuRgAnZ ยท 30,1401 post๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ ๐ต๐ท
@real_Sandra00 ยท 32,3911 postVษชแดแดแดสส Oแด แด s
@Victory_Odds17 ยท 26,0071 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 9
- handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 9
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@FIXEDGYA named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant โ a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 1 September 2026 โ 1 September 2026 ยท confirmed gone 19 September 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 26 August 2026 โ 26 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 27 August 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 26 August 2026 โ 26 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 1 September 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 26 August 2026 โ 26 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 22 August 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 21 August 2026 โ 21 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 27 August 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 21 August 2026 โ 21 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 27 August 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 โ 20 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 23 August 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 โ 20 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 11 September 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 โ 15 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 28 August 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ ๐ก ๐ฎ ๐ ๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ง ๐ซ๐ทโ (@FIXEDGYA), 32,718 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FIXEDGYA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.