Channel
@FIAFederation
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
2,409subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002832279999 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FIAFederation |
| Created | 28 June 2025 โ measured โ dated from the channelโs first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FIAFederation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 2,409 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 2,410 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 2,410 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 28 June 2025 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (28 June 2025 โ 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,654 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
71 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 29 | 40.8% | |
| ๐ | 25 | 35.2% | |
| ๐ฉ | 5 | 7.04% | |
| โก | 4 | 5.63% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 4 | 5.63% | |
| ๐ฏ | 2 | 2.82% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.41% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @FIAFederation. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2025 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Prior to the current defense agreement involving Turkey, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, there existed the Baghdad Pact, also known as CENTO. This military alliance was established in 1955 during the Cold War, comprising Turkey, Iraq, Great Britain, Pakistan, and Iran, with the objective of countering Soviet expansion in the Middle East. It is noteworthy that during the 1965 Indo-Pakistani War, Pakistan's request for asโฆ
โค10
๐จ A Myanmar national was detained at a checkpoint in Chowkibal, Kupwara, today while travelling towards Tangdhar. He was subsequently handed over to the police for further investigation.
๐2
Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have just signed a joint defense agreement in Mecca that an armed attack against any one of the three countries will be considered an attack against all three, marking a new mutual defence commitment.
๐ฉ5โค1
โPoster of Wanted Lashkar-e-Taiba Terrorist Lateef Bhat [3rd August 2026].
๐11โค2
Don't share any videos or images related to the movements or deployments of the Armed forces. If you see any being shared by others, please ask them to remove those. If any account is sharing those even after being warned, please bring it to us . ๐ Contact Support FIAgoverment@proton.me FIAowner@mail.ru https://t.me/FIAFederation/6809 https://t.me/FIAFederation/6809 https://t.me/FIAFederation/6809 Just remiโฆ
๐9๐1
๐จ๐บ ๐กIf you came up with any suspicious IDs, Channel or GC , ANY SOCIAL MEDIA ๐กWhich can be a potential threat,JnK, Khalistan and Anti National elements ๐กImmediately report me including I'd and link, context โ๏ธOur Contect Email ๐ฉ FIAgoverment@proton.me ๐ฉ FIAowner@mail.ru ๐ฑDo not ignore even a small piece of information can help stop a serious threat ๐ฎ ๐ ๐ @FIAgoverment ๐ฎ๐ณ
โค16โก4โคโ๐ฅ4๐3๐ฏ2๐1
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @FIAFederation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank โ 593,223 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐น ๐ ~ ๐๐๐E๐ / ๐๐๐๐๐ / ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ณโ (@FIAFederation), 2,409 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FIAFederation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.