Channel
@FGDCRTYDRU
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
40subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002580518069 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FGDCRTYDRU |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FGDCRTYDRU |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 12:38 | 40 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 41 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 45 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 46 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 46 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 8 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
价格：1200 服务：简单服务 评分：5星 评价：ci了房车锦禾，约好时间，我就在公园原地等待。等待过程我百无聊赖玩手机，一抬头看见辆大大的房车过来了，当时心里很激动，头一次在房车里要。心扑通扑通的跳～，老师温柔打开门问候，很热情，也爱聊天。本来计划就1炮，奈何第一次太快了，新环境让我有点紧张刺激，女上位就射了。临时加了第二炮。老师服务很细腻，耐心。课表该有的都有。兄弟们，没体验过房车的，可以过来体验一把，挺新鲜的，本月射了太多了，今天状态不佳，下次还得二刷一次..锦禾老师，等我～哈哈
价格：3000 服务：全套 评分：5星 评价：下午得空找了小怪pp，很满意态度非常好，长的也好看，皮肤光滑白皙，蜜桃臀A4腰，手感舒适饱满，选了情趣，过程认真放松姿势可尽情体验，也是完美释放了。
【上课价位】:1000 【体验细节】：今天去了兜兜交个作业，老师在老小区，比较安全，很年轻的嫩妹青春气息很浓，颜值可以，大灯晃眼，正常肤色，态度不错，不催不事儿，值得二刷。 【推荐程度】：9.9/10满分，颜值9.6 身材9.6 服务10，态度10，性价比10（五个模。块均给出评分） 【联系方式】:@jinhe5566
【上课价位】:1000 【体验细节】：今天去了兜兜交个作业，老师在老小区，比较安全，很年轻的嫩妹青春气息很浓，颜值可以，大灯晃眼，正常肤色，态度不错，不催不事儿，值得二刷。 【推荐程度】：9.9/10满分，颜值9.6 身材9.6 服务10，态度10，性价比10（五个模。块均给出评分） 【联系方式】:@jinhe5566
【上课价位】:1600 【体验细节】：cj了贝拉ls，环境还不错，ls年轻白腿长御姐类型，口了一会直接开干，先女上，感觉不错，年轻就是紧致，然后选择了我最喜欢的侧入123结束战斗，好评。 【推荐程度】：9.9/10满分，颜值9.6 身材9.6 服务10，态度10，性价比10（五个模。块均给出评分） 【联系方式】:@Beila0174
❤1
【上课价位】:1600 【体验细节】：遇上特殊时期，思来想去还是去沈老师这里寻求快乐，也是许久未来了。这次老师的怀抱格外的暖，这次不赶时间可以慢慢，开展，过程不叙述了。吃颜值的，吃身材的，吃姿势的来就完事了。 【推荐程度】：9.9/10满分，颜值9.6 身材9.6 服务10，态度10，性价比10（五个模。块均给出评分） 【联系方式】:@Shenlingshi7v7
【上课价位】:1500 【体验细节】：见到老师后，比照片好看，果断交水费。老师性格很好，说话甜甜的，皮肤很白很嫩，抱了一会，后就去洗澡，共浴，到床上后，老师直接给我口，舒服，女上在上面摇几下，会夹会吸，换了几个姿势，最后缴械了。 【推荐程度】：9.9/10满分，颜值9.6 身材9.6 服务10，态度10，性价比10（五个模。块均给出评分） 【联系方式】:
【上课价位】:1200 【体验细节】：今天闲来无事，打算中午出击，还是选择了就近cj，四刷大兴泡泡了，还是一如既往地好身材，俏皮的性格，该有的都有，🐍吻管饱，中午时间有点小饿ls还给点了外卖，非常贴心，女上比之前要更好，还买了死库水，不出所料好身材就是适合这种衣服，还不错的一次体验。 【推荐程度】：9.9/10满分，颜值9.6 身材9.6 服务10，态度10，性价比10（五个模。块均给出评分） 【联系方式】:@pao0164a
【上课价位】:800 【体验细节】：cj了亚运村萌萌老师，工作室花心思布置了，很干净。老师属于服务系的，会聊天，服务也很仔细，喜欢服务的兄弟可以试试。 【推荐程度】：9.9/10满分，颜值9.6 身材9.6 服务10，态度10，性价比10（五个模。块均给出评分） 【联系方式】:@MMDD520
【上课价位】:1500 【体验细节】：今天cj了江南老师。舌吻相当的瓒。老师特别热情，一进门就抱抱亲亲简直不要太爽。江南男士提供的情绪价值非常好，中间互动不断，要是以后还躺在怀里聊天，女友感满满！！ 【推荐程度】：9.9/10满分，颜值9.6 身材9.6 服务10，态度10，性价比10（五个模。块均给出评分） 【联系方式】:
【上课价位】:1600 【体验细节】：今天临时跟老师约的，本来约的7.30，然后因为堵车加工作的事儿，晚了半小时。老师也没说什么，本来想pp的。身体状态应该不太行，就p了。老师遥控进门，一进门挺漂亮的，典型的温婉型。然后开始洗澡，老师有陪🐟，个人不太喜欢就没需要。洗完老师帮忙擦干，屋里开了暖风很暖和，也有水。洗完擦干净以后老师开始服务，a面，小舌头不错奥。然后开始口，非常好，不说停不停的，特别给劲儿带上雨伞☂️，开始女上，很不错。重点来了，换姿势，提前特意跟老师说感受一字马，别说感觉真不一样，好家伙，感觉整个都进去了。酷酷开始凿，感觉快来了，让叫老公就叫，一声声娇喘，感觉更甚。最后冲刺，她会吸，感觉二弟不停的被吸进去，也感觉在夹，特别爽。最后冲刺中出货，感官真的很棒，推荐，本人估计会二刷。 【推荐程度】：9.9/10满分，颜值9.6 身材9.6 服务10，态度10，性价比10（五个模。块均给出评分） 【联系方式】:@Shenli…
【上课价位】:3500 【体验细节】：提前一天与老师商量约好夜课，从北边一路向南，老师工作室布置得很温馨，紫色氛围灯也很对味，初次被老师吸引的是她的鞋品，油丝配小皮鞋太拿人了。有一说一见面后，见面后我一直在说“你比照片要更美”这是实话，臭宝本人会有些反差，真正意义上做到了可咸可甜，散下头发很风情，盘起头发又很邻家小女孩，性格也是非常的E，可以说是秒破冰，不会让人感到尴尬。夜挺漫长一发结束后，臭宝下厨整了小龙虾，俩人边吃边喝边聊，圆了我一入二人世界的梦，很享受这个时光，一个美好的夜晚。希望臭宝一切安好，有缘再见。 【推荐程度】：9.9/10满分，颜值9.6 身材9.6 服务10，态度10，性价比10（五个模。块均给出评分） 【联系方式】:
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FGDCRTYDRU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@FGDCRTYDRU named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🏪北京同城报告发布🏪（免费上榜）” (@FGDCRTYDRU), 40 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FGDCRTYDRU.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.