又给你谎言先生玩美了 单陀螺仪的准度 你们还不玩吗😆
👍7

Channel
@FC_Kernel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
13,227subscribers
+1,091 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002380296925 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FC_Kernel |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 53 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FC_Kernel |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:49 | 13,227 | -14 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:16 | 13,241 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:46 | 13,245 | -11 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:21 | 13,256 | -14 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 13,270 | +1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 13,269 | +4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 13,265 | +18 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:59 | 13,247 | +17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 13,230 | +14 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:46 | 13,216 | +17 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 13,199 | +7 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:07 | 13,192 | +5 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:27 | 13,187 | +11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:49 | 13,176 | +18 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:59 | 13,158 | +94 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:41 | 13,064 | +205 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:10 | 12,859 | +158 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:07 | 12,701 | -5 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 15:07 | 12,706 | -7 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 08:20 | 12,713 | first reading |
164 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 164 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,063 reactions across 153 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,040 | 97.8% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 1.41% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 0.47% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.282% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 153 of the 164 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,063 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 164 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
又给你谎言先生玩美了 单陀螺仪的准度 你们还不玩吗😆
👍7
再欺骗我我真的要生气了学生党,自己看看连胜多少把 观察期就受着知道吗 这就是欺骗谎言先生的后果😋
👍10
这次是真拉闸了😭
👍10
可以的学生党终于不配中野69了,良民😡😡😡😡
👍6
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4
再拿FC搭配中野69真要奖励你了😡😡😡
👍10
Photo, posted without a caption
👍9
6666敢用FC搭配中野69,此等小生马上删卡
👍5
Photo, posted without a caption
👍6
闪框解密/掉效果解密/模型解密全部正常
👍10
和平追踪已同步重启辅助即可使用 稳定性未知,反正是上个赛季的同款
👍2
PUBGM版本已补卡~❤️❤️❤️
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 164 posts we hold for @FC_Kernel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
今天要不要更新呢
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
FC要适配印度服吗
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
最近不是有人开源了个观战预警吗,那破玩意我研究了一下可以再预警更多东西,你们想要吗
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你们想玩断点美化吗,好像可以秒刷
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 164 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FuckCheat通知频道” (@FC_Kernel), 13,227 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FC_Kernel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.