Channel
@FARSHAD_MOMENI
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,164subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001061226483 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FARSHAD_MOMENI |
| Created | 5 May 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FARSHAD_MOMENI |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @dinoeqtesad/635028 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC | @FARSHAD_MOMENI/4140 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @dinoeqtesad/635128 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC | @FARSHAD_MOMENI/4141 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @dinoeqtesad | 19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 6.9 hours | @dinoeqtesad (19–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 22 comparable posts for this entry, running 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @nahadgara. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 3,164 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:21 | 3,162 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:50 | 3,165 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 3,165 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (24 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,990 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 10 | 32.3% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 32.3% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 19.4% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 6.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎧 نسخه شنیداری 📌 موضوع جلسه: مصدق و آرمانهای مشروطیت 📌سخنرانان: دکتر فرشاد مومنی دکتر رسول رئیس جعفری ⏰ زمان: پنجشنبه ۱۵ مردادماه ۱۴۰۵ 📍مکان: موسسه مطالعات دین و اقتصاد @dinoeqtesad
💯5
#گزیده_سخنرانی گاهی یک جمله، میتواند به ابزاری برای توجیه بزرگترین بیعدالتیها تبدیل شود. «قیمتها را خدا تعیین میکند!» اما اگر چنین است، پس نقش انحصارها، رانتها، مافیاهای اقتصادی و سوءاستفاده از قدرت چیست؟ آیا هر افزایش قیمتی را باید به حساب اراده الهی گذاشت یا باید از کسانی پرسید که با برخورداری از موقعیتهای انحصاری، زندگی مردم را دشوارتر میکنند؟ دکتر فرشاد مومنی با استناد به دیدگاه شهید آیتالله دکتر به…
💯1
موسسه مطالعات دین و اقتصاد برگزار مینماید: 📌 موضوع جلسه: مصدق و آرمانهای مشروطیت 📌سخنرانان: دکتر فرشاد مومنی دکتر رسول رئیس جعفری ⏰ زمان: پنجشنبه ۱۵ مردادماه ۱۴۰۵ - ساعت ۱۴ الی ۱۶ 📍مکان: موسسه مطالعات دین و اقتصاد 🟦 جلسه به صورت حضوری و آنلاین از فضای اسکای روم برگزار خواهد شد 🌐 لینک پخش زنده اسکای روم: https://www.skyroom.online/ch/moassesse/institute-of-religion-and-economic @dinoeqtesad
👌2
#گزیده_سخنرانی نسبت دین و توسعه؛ یک دین، دو سرنوشت؛ توسعه یا عقبماندگی؟ آیا دین ذاتاً توسعهساز است یا مانع پیشرفت؟ شهید آیتالله دکتر بهشتی و بسیاری از اندیشمندان توسعه، پرسش را به شکل دیگری مطرح میکنند: مسئله اصلی «دین» نیست، بلکه «نوع قرائت از دین» است. چرا یک دین میتواند در جایی زمینهساز پیشرفت، عدالت و شکوفایی شود و در جایی دیگر به نتایجی کاملاً متفاوت بینجامد؟ گزیدهای از سخنان دکتر فرشاد مومنی درباره ن…
👌1
📚 فهرست کتاب مصدق بدون نفت فصل اول: نژاد و تبار مصدق فصل دوم: از مستوفیگری تا نمایندگی مجلس فصل سوم: مالیه روح مشروطه است فصل چهارم: مصدق یک مرجع علمی فصل پنجم: مصدق و قرارداد ۱۹۱۹ فصل ششم: محتوای قرارداد ۱۹۱۹ فصل هفتم: مصدق والی فارس فصل هشتم: از ولایت تا کودتا فصل نهم: داستان کودتای اسفند فصل دهم: مصدق وزیر مالیه فصل یازدهم: مصدق و والیگری آذربایجان فصل دوازدهم: از وزارت خارجه تا مجلس پنجم فصل سیزدهم: از نخستوز…
⭕ «مصدق بدون نفت» به چاپ دوم رسید 📍 فروش حضوری: 🔸 تهران، میدان ولیعصر، ابتدای بلوار کشاورز، خیابان برادران مظفر، نبش کوچه ذاکری، پلاک ۱۲۶، نشر نهادگرا 🔸 تهران، بلوار کشاورز، تقاطع کارگر، بین خیابان کارگر و جمالزاده، پلاک ۳۰۸، کتاب آمه 🌐 لینک خرید اینترنتی کتاب @nahadgara
💯1
حسین راغفر: 🔸 دلاریسازی اقتصاد، محصول توزیع نابرابر فرصتهاست 🔸 دسترسی رانتی به منابع، شکاف طبقاتی را تشدید کرده است ✅ دکتر حسین راغفر در نشستی با عنوان «رژیمهای نابرابری و ایدئولوژیهای توجیهکننده نابرابریهای ناموجه» در موسسه دین و اقتصاد که به مناسبت رونمایی از کتاب «سرمایه و ایدئولوژی» نوشته توماس پیکتی و ترجمه حسین راغفر برگزار شد اظهار کرد: تا پیش از قرون وسطا در کشورهای صنعتی هرکسی که محروم به دنیا میآمد…
👏1
فرشاد مومنی: 🔸 بازدهی رانت و ربا از تولید بیشتر شده است 🔸 ۷۴ درصد سپردههای بلندمدت بانکی در اختیار یک درصد سپردهگذاران است ✅ دکتر فرشاد مومنی در نشستی با عنوان «رژیمهای نابرابری و ایدئولوژیهای توجیهکننده نابرابریهای ناموجه» در موسسه دین و اقتصاد که به مناسبت رونمایی از کتاب «سرمایه و ایدئولوژی» نوشته توماس پیکتی و ترجمه حسین راغفر برگزار شد اظهار کرد: این همه هزینه میکنید و جمعیت دانشآموخته دانشگاهی را از حد…
👏1
دوره آموزشی بایستهها و نابایستههای تصمیمگیری و تخصیص منابع ارزی (مرور تجربه چهار ساله) مدرس دوره: دکتر فرشاد مومنی ⭕ با اعطای گواهینامه شرکت در دوره 🌐 لینک ثبتنام دوره ارتباط با کارشناسان مربوطه 👈 @dinoeqtesad_admin @dinoeqtesad
👏2❤1
🎧 نسخه شنیداری 📌 موضوع جلسه: رژیمهای نابرابری و ایدئولوژیهای توجیهکننده نابرابریهای ناموجه به مناسبت رونمایی از کتاب «سرمایه و ایدئولوژی» 📌سخنرانان: دکتر فرشاد مومنی دکتر حسین راغفر ⏰ زمان: پنجشنبه ۸ مردادماه ۱۴۰۵ 📍مکان: موسسه مطالعات دین و اقتصاد @dinoeqtesad
💯3
موسسه مطالعات دین و اقتصاد برگزار مینماید: 📌 موضوع جلسه: رژیمهای نابرابری و ایدئولوژیهای توجیهکننده نابرابریهای ناموجه به مناسبت رونمایی از کتاب «سرمایه و ایدئولوژی» 📌سخنرانان: دکتر فرشاد مومنی دکتر حسین راغفر ⏰ زمان: پنجشنبه ۸ مردادماه ۱۴۰۵ - ساعت ۱۴ الی ۱۶ 📍مکان: موسسه مطالعات دین و اقتصاد 🟦 جلسه به صورت حضوری و آنلاین از فضای اسکای روم برگزار خواهد شد 🌐 لینک پخش زنده اسکای روم: https://www.skyroom.onl…
👌2
#گزیده_سخنرانی حاکمیت قانون، نه اراده اشخاص؛ یکی از برجستهترین ارکان اندیشه سیاسی شهید بهشتی دکتر فرشاد مومنی با اشاره به آثار تفسیری شهید آیتالله دکتر بهشتی، از اندیشهای سخن میگوید که به تعبیر او، سالها از زمانه خود جلوتر بود؛ اندیشهای که نظم اجتماعی مطلوب قرآن را بر پایه قانون و ضابطه میفهمد، نه بر محور اشخاص. شهید بهشتی برای تحقق یک نظم اجتماعی عادلانه، اصولی را برمیشمارد که از نگاه او نباید تحت هیچ شرا…
👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @FARSHAD_MOMENI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@FARSHAD_MOMENI named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فرشاد مومنی/FARSHAD MOMENI” (@FARSHAD_MOMENI), 3,164 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FARSHAD_MOMENI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.