Channel
@FAQcrypta
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,798subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001306799268 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FAQcrypta |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FAQcrypta |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 1,798 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 1,800 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:51 | 1,801 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 1,801 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
72 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 60 | 83.3% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 5.56% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 1.39% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2022 to 30 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
what already happened is: BTC reached the target of Double tops (64k - 31k- 15k) at weekly frame. What is happening now: Facing MA200 at 25k weekly. What might be in plan: Reject MA200 weekly at 25k, pull back to print a iH&S pattern then continue to 30k.
👏1
Обратите внимание на альткоины которые лучше всего отскакивают, это говорит о том, что в этих проектах есть маркет-мейкер, следовательно эти активы стоит закупить при следующем снижении на новый минимум, который по моему мнению мы еще увидим, после данного рыночного движения.
👍7
Bitcoin 19000$ 🫅
Что там по рынку? Рынок снова в зеленой зоне, несмотря на банкротство BlockFi и его 8 дочек с общим долгом в 10млрд$ и возможной будущей чередой обвалов ряда партнерских проектов. Так же сегодня схлопнулась еще одна биржа Serum, что снова никак не отразилось на рынке. Доминация биткоина: 40.07%; Индекс страха и жадности: 29 (страх); Индекс альтсезона: 37; Капитализация рынка: $808 млрд.
👍7🥰2
В инсте очень много вопросов про SOL Я не думаю, что блокчейн Solana умрет, да сейчас сложный период для них, но они должны выкарабкаться, уж очень плотно этот блокчейн оброс проектами и развил свою инфраструктуру. Я не продаю свои монеты SOL, но и не докупаю.
Реакция биткоина на то, что инфляция в США начала снижение 🤝
Ровно 14 лет назад (31 октября 2008 года) был опубликован Whitepaper Bitcoin. Вот оно, реальное зарождение всей крипты. Создать Биткоина до сих неизвестен 🫥
👍7
Кит который копил всё лето битки слил вчера 4500 BTC. Тоесть думает что будем падать и хочет откупить дешевле или нужны деньги на постройку бункера :)
👍3👎2
CryptoPunk 2924 продан за 3 300 ETH или 4.45 млн $ 🤝
Старый и нелегитимный эфир иксует :)
🎉 The Merge случился! На блоке #15537392 состоялось самое ожидаемое крипто-событие года, а может быть и последних пяти лет. Разработчики не столкнулись с какими-либо трудностями и всё прошло успешно Теперь Ethereum официально перешёл на алгоритм консенсуса Proof-of-Stake (PoS). Обновление поможет сети масштабироваться, а сам токен примет дефляционную модель, ведь число токенов будет постоянно уменьшаться посредств…
👍4
Обратный отсчёт 🕐 До перехода ETH на протокол POS осталось 3 дня и 15 часов Хардфорк тогда же. Следить за временем можно по ссылке
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FAQcrypta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,011,736 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мир Криптовалют” (@FAQcrypta), 1,798 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FAQcrypta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.