Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

51% ATTACK FAIL👾

@FAIL51

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,560subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002166294843
TypeChannel
Username@FAIL51
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FAIL51

Growth

2,5602,5642,5626 August 2026 — 2,564 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,564 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,561 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,560 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,559–2,565 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 22:122,560-1
9 Aug 2026, 05:032,561-3
6 Aug 2026, 09:412,564no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:182,564first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 27 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.8%
avg views ÷ 2,560 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,120
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held15 (27 March 202623 July 2026)
Views total2,244
Reactions total69
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

402 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
25362.9%
❤‍🔥4711.7%
custom 53774439581986411214511.2%
🐳245.97%
💋225.47%
💘61.49%
😈30.746%
🗿20.498%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 402reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
126
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 15 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
36
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FAIL51. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 March 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 09:20 UTC984 views14 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пока АРК мнется, челы из тезера решили ликву себе в чейн налить Сео запостил мем , после которго на чейне Stable начались движения. Советую смотреть на этот чейн в ближайшие дни. На декс скринере нет этого чейна, зато есть бейзед бот - https://basedbot.app/stable бридж рилей. либо с эфир мейнета , либо с бейза - https://relay.link/ ( ликву бытро разбирают надо мониторить. Я вчера еще завел ) По щиткм хз че щам мо

❤‍🔥8💋32🐳1

19 Jul 2026, 19:14 UTC≈1,260 views55 reactions11 Starsread 7 August 2026

Кароче, что я понял за робингуд эру и что дальше: Надо вовремя уметь переключаться с дохлого рынка на активный и переспективный. Типо когда видишь , что чейн какой-то живет тренчи летают , то можно ( и даже нужно ) оставлять что-то на холд. Например я себе и парням из приватки ботил эту коллекцию. Там минт был 2 бакса, после солда сразу 15 - 20 стоили. Лично себе я 100 штук набрал и сразу начал лить ( ну а хули - т

44🐳5💋4❤‍🔥1😈1

9 Jul 2026, 19:26 UTC≈1,890 views17 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026

Йоу, с фри бычков неплохо поабузили, 1- 2 сибильного рефа достаточно было для влки. Я всех своих продавал за баксов 30 - 40. Давненького таких простых денег не было. Судя по всему мувы на солане из бек поэтому подумайте вот над этим. Не видел особо , что шилили: Известный пепедеген (@pepetoshi) анонсировал NFT-коллекцию на Solana с 10k саплай ( холд этой нфт дает мемкоин $FROG ) и он кароче закинул 4ого июля свой к

12❤‍🔥2🐳2💘1

7 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC≈1,610 views24 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

Здарова отпищики. Зарекаюсь не пропадать больше V3 За это с меня подгоны Дак чейн тестнет уже закончился - тут можно свою статистику посмотреть — https://inception.dachain.io/ Гниды они или нет посмотрим на ТГЕ Пока нашел еще 2 прикольных проектика и я сдел ФРИ СОФТ лдя него. Первый это Unicity - https://x.com/unicity_labs Почему я в это лезу: 1. Проект из Европы/ОАЭ, тима открытая, не как обычно. Вот пост: https

13🐳5💋3💘2😈1

19 May 2026, 13:39 UTC≈2,370 views28 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
File

Ребята, кто не понял мне не надо ничего за софт Не надо мне скидывать пруфы, что вы зарегались по рефке. Только ради этого софта не надо в приватку вступать. Софт просто так лежит в боте в разделе бесплатные софты. Рефка просто так оставлена , можете на нее сделать акк можете просто - мне похуй. Это чисто спасибо спасибо как и оплата приватки. Прикладываю файл если у кого проблемы с ботом. Но новые версии софта бу

19💋4custom 53774439581986411214❤‍🔥1

15 May 2026, 20:33 UTC≈2,570 views23 reactions35 Starsread 7 August 2026

Дарова заебал. раз отпищики перестали отписываться то ловите софтик Напомню: https://x.com/dac_chain - единственный норм тестнет который который ща есть ( по моему мнению ). Но я дурак у меня справка есть во первых — всё что нафармишь переходит 1 к 1 в мейнет. плюс через квесты идёт сжигание токенов из саплая, так что инфляции нет вторая — новость была что гугл объявил что квантовые компьютеры уже близко. у эфира

14custom 53774439581986411214❤‍🔥2🐳2💋1

10 May 2026, 18:32 UTC≈2,160 views56 reactions7 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

щас такой рынок , что любое говно улетает. Месяц назад оно бы даже не заминтилось https://opensea.io/collection/liquidfrogjpg - было дохуя форм, даже на паблик осталось. с 3 до 20 баксов взлтают https://opensea.io/collection/ferrymanurns - жесткое фомо. Не понятно как, но они с 2 баксов до 90 доходили за 2 часа. У всех были фкфс. Разбирались минут 15. Я негр и продал по 30 Как то много стало залентой ликвы в НФТ.

43❤‍🔥8💋4custom 53774439581986411211

6 May 2026, 17:14 UTC≈2,070 views19 reactions36 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня какая-от ебанутая бычка все арт нфт стреляют, колекция слонкс выросла с 5 баксов до 160 ( думаю рилато следующии ) я скипнул панков. но жестко нафармил 3к баксов на ардиналсах на AWP сети ( новый рекорд приватки ) . Поставил 10 иигентов в самом начале майнить. Токены авп выросли в 15 раз, так мне еще леги и рарки выпадали Вообще ии агента поствь на ардиналс гем ебанутый, еще пол саплай нфт есть. Но надо ст

12❤‍🔥4🐳2💋1

4 May 2026, 18:26 UTC≈1,940 views26 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026

Здарова, ты как? Кароче, сейчас идет хайп на арт NFT. С паблик-минта за десятки баксов улетают до нескольких тысяч долларов. Ну сами понимаете искусство. И вот у меня для тебя пару штучек https://x.com/Nasbelaeth/status/2051143201814446407?s=20 nasient.xyz Зарегистрируйся тут. Это от чела, который черепа фришные выпускал, которые потом росли до 300 баксов. В приватке естественно никто не додержал. В прошлый раз на

20❤‍🔥3🐳2💋1

25 Apr 2026, 19:17 UTC≈1,930 views19 reactions7 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Юнипег в итоге дал 11 иксов с поста. Хитали 11 милионов. Пепа вырасла в 5 раз с поста. Весь нфт рынок зеленый. Не день , а кайф так и хочется выложить софт на DAC чейн в паблик, хммм но... 🩸

11custom 53774439581986411215❤‍🔥2🐳1

25 Apr 2026, 15:18 UTC≈1,680 views17 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Юпег все таки выстрелил. Только понни, только добро 👽

10❤‍🔥3💘2custom 53774439581986411212

23 Apr 2026, 19:25 UTC≈2,010 views38 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Если тебе нехуй делать то: фарми Dango если веришь в ретродропы. Чел пообещал токен в Q4 + 50 процентов на аирдроп ( привет фарос 1 процент гандоны ) фарми DAC единственный норм тестнет пока наши столбы не прошарили. Все токены , что щас нафармишь — перейдут в мейнет. Не поинты ни спасибо , а прям 1 к 1. Если у кого увидишь знай что спижено у меня, а я спиздил из твитера. по нфт есть проектик прикольный - https://

21custom 537744395819864112110❤‍🔥5🐳1💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @FAIL51. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 306,836 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“51% ATTACK FAIL👾” (@FAIL51), 2,560 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FAIL51.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.