Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FAFO Reality Check

Channel

FAFO Reality Check

@FAFOrealitycheck

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

584subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002014069069
TypeChannel
Username@FAFOrealitycheck
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FAFOrealitycheck

Growth

584589586.57 August 2026 — 589 subscribers8 August 2026 — 589 subscribers15 August 2026 — 586 subscribers24 August 2026 — 584 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 583–590 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 09:17584-2
15 Aug 2026, 20:37586-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:18589no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:03589first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 17 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

507 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥18736.9%
😁14929.4%
👍8416.6%
5510.8%
🤡152.96%
💯112.17%
💩20.394%
😈20.394%
👎10.197%
🤮10.197%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 507reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2024 to 6 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2024, 10:58 UTC≈4,220 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Friends, you can always submit your requests. We will do our very best to honour your wishes.

25😁4🤡3👍2💩2🤮1

20 Aug 2024, 09:45 UTC≈3,950 views62 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

And then there's Gabriel Ducu Stamate. A man with an extensive criminal history. Do we want to know more about him? 🤔

👍55😁5🤡2

20 Aug 2024, 09:38 UTC≈2,820 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

For those of you wanting a mercenary, do you want to know more?

👍19🔥6🤡1

20 Aug 2024, 09:26 UTC≈2,430 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Trick question, friends. Ian Trevor Hicks aka "John Jackson" is both. A failed lawyer from Colorado, and a failed mercenary.

😁23

5 Aug 2024, 20:05 UTC≈6,740 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Wouldn’t it be a shame if people contacted the publisher of Pekka’s book to let them know of his proclivity for spanking his monkey at a concentration camp and pedophilic websites. Do they make a habit of supporting such bottom dwellers?

😁47🤡5🔥1

4 Aug 2024, 15:46 UTC≈2,370 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

If you had to choose only one, which would it be?

  1. Lawyer50%
  2. Mercenary50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥6

3 Aug 2024, 21:38 UTC≈2,180 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Dear friends, we will still be doing full write ups on individuals that warrant the extra attention. Not everyone is interesting enough to write about. The new format is primarily meant to faster push information out to you, our friends. We haven't forgotten about you, Gabriel.

🔥36👍7😁3🤡2

3 Aug 2024, 19:59 UTC≈2,150 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥47😁32

31 Jul 2024, 16:10 UTC≈2,260 views74 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Let's look into this vile creature a little more, shall we?

🔥52💯11😁53😈2👎1

31 Jul 2024, 16:06 UTC≈1,930 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Dear friends, we apologize for the delay. Current events have kept us very busy. We're going to do something slightly different before the main event.

22🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @FAFOrealitycheck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2024, 15:46 UTCAnonymous Poll222 voters

If you had to choose only one, which would it be?

  1. Lawyer50%
  2. Mercenary50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2024 to 6 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FAFO Reality Check” (@FAFOrealitycheck), 584 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FAFOrealitycheck.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.