Channel
@FACEAXIOMA
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,497subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002122125430 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FACEAXIOMA |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FACEAXIOMA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 1,497 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 1,502 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 1,503 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 1,504 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,410 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
22 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 31.8% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 27.3% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 22.7% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 18.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
За эту неделю мы говорили об отёках с разных сторон 🌟 • Показали домашнюю технику • Разобрали, почему одинаковые советы помогают не всем • Обсудили, почему отёки могут возвращаться Но если оставить только одну мысль, она будет такой: Не существует универсального способа убрать отёки… Существует понимание причины, которая привела ткани именно в это состояние. Поэтому поиск новой техники, нового средства или ново…
❤1🥰1😍1
Почему одна и та же техника помогает одному человеку и почти не меняет состояние другого? 🧐 После публикации домашней техники многие задают похожий вопрос: Если упражнение действительно работает, почему результат у всех разный? Потому что одинакового отёка не существует 🙂↔️ Внешне лица могут выглядеть похоже, но состояние тканей может отличаться 🛁 В своей практике мы чаще всего наблюдаем 3️⃣ ситуации 👇 • Первая…
После утреннего ухода лицо действительно может выглядеть лучше 👀 Отёчность уменьшается, контуры становятся более чёткими, отражение в зеркале радует. Но проходит несколько часов или наступает следующее утро, и всё повторяется снова… В этот момент многие начинают искать новую технику, другое средство или ещё одну процедуру. Хотя главный вопрос звучит иначе: Почему отёки продолжают возвращаться? 💁🏻♀️ Дело в том, ч…
❤2
Помните, как у Кащея всё самое важное было спрятано не на виду? Сначала нужно было добраться до утки, потом до яйца, а уже внутри находилась та самая игла… У FACEAXIOMA работает похожая система — только намного приятнее и без долгих поисков 😉 Наша «иголочка» — это Telegram-бот, в котором мы собрали всё, что помогает быстро перейти от «надо бы записаться» к конкретному визиту. Именно там можно: ✨ узнать об актуальны…
🔥2🥰2❤1
Вчера мы говорили о том, что одинаковые отёки могут иметь разные причины 🖇️ Поэтому домашние техники тоже не могут быть универсальными! Сегодня показываем одну из техник, которую можно использовать утром, если задача заключается в том, чтобы уменьшить отёчность тканей после сна 😴 Она занимает всего несколько минут и хорошо подходит как часть регулярного домашнего ухода 🤩 Завтра поговорим о том, почему даже правил…
🔥2🥰2❤1
Об отёках написаны тысячи статей 🖇️ Большинство из них сводится к одному и тому же набору рекомендаций: пить больше воды, уменьшить количество соли, использовать патчи или лимфодренажные техники 👀 Часть этих советов действительно работает… …Но возникает закономерный вопрос. Почему одни женщины получают хороший результат, а другие продолжают сталкиваться с отёками практически каждое утро, несмотря на соблюдение все…
❤2🔥2
Спасибо всем, кто принял участие в нашем опросе 🤍 Мы внимательно посмотрели на ваши ответы и видим, что вас особенно волнуют сразу несколько тем: отёки, брыли и чёткий овал лица 🩶 Отёки набрали чуть больше голосов, но разница совсем небольшая — поэтому мы понимаем, что каждая из этих тем для вас действительно актуальна) Именно их мы и будем подробно разбирать в нашем Telegram-канале! 👉 Начнём с темы отёков: почем…
😍3
Какая тема сейчас беспокоит вас больше всего и какую вы хотели бы разобрать в первую очередь?
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Дорогие девушки, нам хочется, чтобы наш Telegram-канал был для вас не только интересным, но и действительно полезным 🤍 Поэтому мы хотим чаще разбирать именно те темы, которые волнуют вас сейчас. Ответьте, пожалуйста, в небольшом опросе ниже ☺️ Тему, которая наберёт больше всего голосов, мы разберём первой: поделимся полезной информацией, рекомендациями и практиками от наших специалистов 👇
А какой массаж подходит именно вам? 🤔 Узнайте на первом визите в FACEAXIOMA 🤍 Мастер проведёт диагностику, определит основные зоны для работы и подберёт техники именно под состояние вашего лица. Ведь отёчность, напряжение и изменение овала могут быть связаны не только с лицом, но и с шеей, положением головы и плечевым поясом. ❗️Первый визит — 2 500₽ В него входят: — диагностика; — индивидуальный план работы; — 30…
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FACEAXIOMA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какая тема сейчас беспокоит вас больше всего и какую вы хотели бы разобрать в первую очередь?
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А что для вас значит хорошо выглядеть? 👇
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,094,303 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FACEAXIOMA” (@FACEAXIOMA), 1,497 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FACEAXIOMA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.