Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Extraction VF 🇫🇷

Channel

Extraction VF 🇫🇷

@ExtractionVFF

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

6,699subscribers

+2,726 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003650678304
TypeChannel
Username@ExtractionVFF
Created3 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ExtractionVFF

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

3,9736,6995,3368 August 2026 — 3,973 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,973 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,004 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,195 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,240 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,358 subscribers22 August 2026 — 4,417 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,461 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,511 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,707 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,758 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,869 subscribers13 September 2026 — 4,904 subscribers17 September 2026 — 4,927 subscribers25 September 2026 — 5,091 subscribers4 October 2026 — 5,419 subscribers10 October 2026 — 5,855 subscribers14 October 2026 — 5,971 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,200 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,254 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,442 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,552 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,645 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,699 subscribers8 August 20261 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 85 days, net +2,726. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,564–7,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Nov 2026, 23:156,699+54
29 Oct 2026, 20:216,645+93
26 Oct 2026, 15:276,552+110
23 Oct 2026, 12:356,442+188
20 Oct 2026, 18:096,254+54
17 Oct 2026, 08:306,200+229
14 Oct 2026, 12:285,971+116
10 Oct 2026, 19:185,855+436
4 Oct 2026, 19:385,419+328
25 Sept 2026, 01:595,091+164
17 Sept 2026, 05:204,927+23
13 Sept 2026, 01:554,904+35
9 Sept 2026, 12:364,869+111
3 Sept 2026, 22:364,758+51
31 Aug 2026, 15:584,707+196
28 Aug 2026, 11:354,511+50
25 Aug 2026, 16:054,461+44
22 Aug 2026, 13:354,417+59
18 Aug 2026, 23:524,358+118
15 Aug 2026, 17:574,240first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 3 January 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.40%
avg views ÷ 6,699 subscribers
Avg views / post
228
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.439%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held11 (3 January 2026 – 21 October 2026)
Views total228
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 10:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

237 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15364.6%
👍6025.3%
🔥177.17%
❤‍🔥52.11%
👏10.422%
🤯10.422%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Oct 2026, 07:25 UTC228 views1 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @coolanimescanalsPhoto

SOLO LEVELING saison 03 VF 🇫🇷 ⚠️ Déjà Disponible Ici 👇 : https://t.me/addlist/eHimzxDHj5ZiOTg8 #News_2026

🤯1

16 Jun 2026, 22:00 UTC≈3,850 views124 reactionsread 4 November 2026

🚨 DISPONIBLE À 1000 LIKES [👍,🔥,❤️‍🔥] ! Un vrai fan ne peut pas passer sans laisser un cœur ❤️📣

❤64👍48🔥12

16 Jun 2026, 22:00 UTC≈3,760 views51 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

EXTRACTION 3 EN FRANÇAIS 🇫🇷 ➡️ @StreamSphereTG 🔝

❤36👍8❤‍🔥5👏1🔥1

16 Jun 2026, 22:00 UTC≈3,510 views7 reactionsread 4 November 2026

👆Max de réactions 🔥 pour m'encourager a publié davantage 🙏

❤7

16 Jun 2026, 21:58 UTC≈3,490 views20 reactionsread 4 November 2026
File

EXTRACTION 01 2020 VF.mkv ➪🚨 ABONNE TOI ➡️ TOUTES LES CHAINES

❤17👍3

16 Jun 2026, 21:58 UTC≈3,560 views25 reactionsread 4 November 2026
File

EXTRACTION 02 VF 2023.mkv ➪🚨 ABONNE TOI ➡️ TOUTES LES CHAINES

❤20🔥4👍1

16 Jun 2026, 21:58 UTC≈3,390 views9 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

#Film Extraction 1 - 2 VF 🇫🇷 ➡️ @StreamSphereTG 🔝

❤9

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ExtractionVFF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ExtractionVFF edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
3 November 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @ExtractionVFF as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Extraction VF 🇫🇷” (@ExtractionVFF), 6,699 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ExtractionVFF.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.