File, posted without a caption

Channel
Рентгенолог ☢️ Ирина Афанасьева
@ExpectoRentgenum
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,028subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002169306543 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ExpectoRentgenum |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ExpectoRentgenum |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 2,028 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 2,030 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 2,027 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 2,025 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 2,023 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 2,020 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 2,017 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 2,016 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 2,016 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
150 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 38.0% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 18.7% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 16.0% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 12.0% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 6.00% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 4.00% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 2.67% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 2.00% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.667% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔝🔝🔝🔝🔝🔝🔝🔝🔝🔝 ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Penetrating Trauma-Abdomen and Pelvis: Update 2026 представляет собой обновленное руководство по лучевой диагностике проникающих травм мочевыводящих путей, опубликованное в марте 2026 года. Оригинальное название: ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Penetrating Trauma-Abdomen and Pelvis: Update 2026. Журнал/источник: Journal of the American College of Radiology (JACR) Дата/год: 2026…
🔥5❤3🤝1
Здесь https://www.instagram.com/afanaseva_is_radiology каждую неделю выходят дайджесты новостей медицинских и не очень ➡️ вот в таком формате 🗣️
❤8💔4🔥2
Репост от коллеги - вдруг кто-то очень хотел, но стеснялся спросить 🙋
🙏1
‼️Alarma. Ищу студента, который хочет стать рентгенологом, Или ординатора На подработку на 4 нед в должности младшего медперсонала. Условия: работу работать по несколько часов в пятидневку, подробности в личных сообщениях. Я взамен в июле проведу одно или несколько индивидуальных занятий по КТА бесплатно, в отделении. Понимаю что загадочно. Но кто швабры не боится и хочет научиться смотреть КТА за лето - я очень…
🟢КОМБИНИРОВАННЫЙ РАЗРЫВ МОЧЕВОГО ПУЗЫРЯ🟢 ⚠️Редкая штука — 5–10% всех травм пузыря. ⚠️Чаще всего его компанией будут: высокоэнергетическая травма, переломы костей таза и гематурия. ⚡️Имеем в виду: переломы костей таза + гематурия = ~ 30% вероятности повреждения пузыря. ⁉️Хирургу от вас нужны не тонны текста, а конкретный ответ — есть ли интраперитонеальный компонент. От него зависит, идет ли пациент в операционную э…
❤10💔5🔥3🤝3
🟢Шкала повреждений мочевого пузыря AAST 🟢КТ-цистография и модифицированная классификация Sandler 🟢Сравнение классификации AAST vs Sandler
❤14🤩4🤝1
Signed мой бот помощник
Ответ на викторину ⬆️⬆️⬆️ ✔️внебрюшинный разрыв мочевого пузыря - моча и контрастный препарат располагаются внебрюшинно, перивезикально ✔️AAST 2 #разрыв_мочевого_пузыря Справочные материалы по травме мочевого пузыря оставлю ниже ⬇️
❤12👍6🤝1
Signed мой бот помощник
Там ⬆️
- Внебрюшинный разрыв47%
- Внутрибрюшинный разрыв.42%
- AAST 213%
- AAST 313%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Понедельник - день тяжелый недели 💫 Начнем неделю с викторины ☘️
Картинка, которая недавно «испугала» коллегу-клинициста. Что это? Рак? Разрыв? Почему на салют 🎇 похоже? Это норма. Так выглядит «впрыск» мочи с контрастным препаратом при КТА.
😁18👍14❤3👀3
🔴Гнойный гной, махароша. Теперь в авторстве AOS. 🟢Классификация первичных инфекций позвоночника AO Spine AO Spine Primary Infection Classification System Авторы определяют использование - классификация разработана для первичной оценки пациентов с первичными инфекциями позвоночника и может применяться для всех видов инфекций. 🟢Аналогичная структура с классификационной системой AO Spine для повреждений позвонков с по…
🔥18❤7👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ExpectoRentgenum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Там ⬆️
- Внебрюшинный разрыв47%
- Внутрибрюшинный разрыв.42%
- AAST 213%
- AAST 313%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 9 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рентгенолог ☢️ Ирина Афанасьева” (@ExpectoRentgenum), 2,028 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ExpectoRentgenum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.