Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Exuberant Huddle. #D-Day

@Exhle

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001620602908
TypeChannel
Username@Exhle
Descriptionㅤ Ample nook titivated with iridescent blimps, bandeaux, and succulent vivers seem derelict in their sight. In lieu of divulging penchants, just say, "Happy Death Day" by aid of @ExhleBot. All lethal stories are kept well in @HistoryOfExhle. ㅤ
Created11 December 2021measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/Exhle

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 18:1719first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 11 December 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Videos
1
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

5 Mar 2025, 18:49 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

20 Dec 2021, 12:00 UTC701 viewsread 13 August 2026

ㅤ Ain't getting moored up instead copious to get hooked furthermore right on this party tonight. Ablaze mishaps in a jiffy when it starts to blow any of your engrossment. Oh? It must be doleful seeing those screens split up in serenity. Interestingly enough how about bashing this erstwhile and for all. Let's get outre on the beat as a little bass wouldn't hurt any conjecture. Endlessly getting a sterling smite but st

20 Dec 2021, 12:00 UTC701 viewsread 13 August 2026

ㅤ Felt withal than equitable lucid obligation but finer as a dignified metier. Scrawl down more-or-less ligature that got twisted in the still talk of electrician. Disembogue the vanquish as now is the time for another evolution in that time of yearly edification. Some say put one the basics baking off all the quintessential to the fuming kinsfolk within misanthropist skeptic. Endowment adjacent for the subjugate out

20 Dec 2021, 12:00 UTC561 viewsread 13 August 2026

ㅤ Synthetizer for the cognizance on how a finesse do prove a crux. Within cavernous fathomless notion that symbolises disquietude, obligation and replevy quietus all the way? Sure that is messed up vast time. Course the solitary colour ain't gonna make it up to you, by means nil will change in this era. Get it right nor zilch right will erratic facts over a snippet of card for you preeminent day ever on the notable s

20 Dec 2021, 12:00 UTC501 viewsread 13 August 2026

ㅤ Bewildered by the gauze withering his own philosophy between knowledge and how cords could produce excogitative innuendo. Must be upsetting and quite unsettling backing up your expectations but you know that ain't a milestone. Unfavorable than before yet still confused on how a Happy Birthday would sound. In durability a simple 1, 2, 3 shouldn't make you awed in your worst day siding on, Edbert Duarte. ㅤ

20 Dec 2021, 12:00 UTC451 viewsread 13 August 2026

ㅤ Vocally strung within jottings that cause a strike-up demand. Just like consortium progressive individuality being fascinated isn't something to called out about. Mistakenly be the happiest day but out-of-pocket tunes made it less breathtaking with all the fakes. Skilled but kept getting killed on how to disseminate the keyboards. Get denouement and don't second handedly make it, Elekai Duchlen.ㅤ ㅤ

20 Dec 2021, 12:00 UTC423 viewsread 13 August 2026

ㅤ On leadership referring to yet another frequent beseech targeting self-doubts in curiosity. Hitting those marginalized with a full-on bang in the sticks that hold many jurisdictions. Allocated in uncharted scenarios harvested a way better perspective than your own etiquette. Getting down to macrocosm for more consciousness shall he be named Earle O'Connor. ㅤ

20 Dec 2021, 12:00 UTC425 viewsread 13 August 2026

ㅤ As equivalent in the tribunal and scuffle tussle, the ultimatum and eagerness, the monadnock and excavation, the solicitous and lenient placed upon the backs of cadre lads. A noteworthy impresario is incited not by competency but by leniency. Therefore she can do exploits in aggregate but make one self a boon pal to those whom she bide. Unequivocally venerated, and favored for benign. Maintains an indulgent sculpte

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Exhle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,327,172 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Exuberant Huddle. #D-Day” (@Exhle), 19 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Exhle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.