Posted without readable text
👍5custom 52763941537967258483custom 53660548903406341991

Channel
@Exan13Poker
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,597subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001347779829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Exan13Poker |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Exan13Poker |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 2,597 | -5 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 2,602 | +29 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 2,573 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 2,575 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:24 | 2,574 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 2,575 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 2,576 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 2,579 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 2,581 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 2,585 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 2,586 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 2,589 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 2,589 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
74 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 25 | 33.8% | |
| custom 5276394153796725848 | 22 | 29.7% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 14.9% | |
| custom 5375163339154399459 | 5 | 6.76% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 5.41% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 4.05% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 2.70% | |
| custom 5366054890340634199 | 1 | 1.35% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.35% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Exan13Poker. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
👍5custom 52763941537967258483custom 53660548903406341991
Posted without readable text
custom 52763941537967258482custom 53751633391543994592
© 2026 Poker University. All rights reserved. cash • автор Poker Ability Какая концепция в покере позволяет делать хиро коллы и отчаянные блефы В видео рассматривается понятие «капнутого» диапазона и способы его использования при построении линии розыгрыша. Poker Ability — это школа обучения кэш-игре, в которой представлено несколько специализированных обучающих программ. Ознакомиться с ними подробнее можно с по…
👍2custom 52763941537967258481
© 2026 Poker University. All rights reserved. mtt • автор GTO_Wizard Когнитивные искажения и их влияние на игру в покер – часть 2 Во второй части психологической серии от GTO Wizard подробно разбираются опасные ментальные ловушки, которые незаметно уничтожают винрейт любого игрока.
custom 52763941537967258483👍1
© 2026 Poker University. All rights reserved. cash • автор Poker Ability Какое существует золотое правило для правильных блефов в покере В видео рассматриваются принципы выбора рук для чек-рейза против регуляров в позиции большого блайнда как на велью, так и в блеф. Poker Ability — это школа обучения кэш-игре, в которой представлено несколько специализированных обучающих программ. Ознакомиться с ними подробнее м…
custom 52763941537967258483🤔1
«А вот здесь сильный игрок использовал против меня тот же приём. Очень хотелось вскрыть, но тайм-банка почему-то не оказалось. В итоге пришлось выбросить, и теперь немного жалею об этом.»
✍2
«Если нравится, закину ещё несколько раздач. Они не такие любопытные, но тоже очень хорошие.»
👍8
© 2026 Poker University. All rights reserved. MTT • автор Exan13 Разбор заноса Exan13 в $55 Big Bounties Daily Main — 3 место и $12,360. В центре внимания — поздняя стадия турнира, ключевые раздачи, игра за баунти, адаптация к оппонентам и стратегические решения в наиболее важных игровых ситуациях. Видео также доступно на YouTube и VK Видео.
👏6🤝4💯3
Показывать ещё раздачи с блефами или уже в целом всё понятно и можно заканчивать?
👍2
«🥛 Парень не понял на кого нарвался...»
© 2026 Poker University. All rights reserved. mtt • автор GTO_Wizard Руководство для игрока в покер по преодолению когнитивных искажений Новая статья помогает покеристам выявить ментальные ловушки, такие как иллюзия контроля, и защитить свою стратегию от влияния эмоций.
👏5custom 52763941537967258483custom 53751633391543994593
© 2026 Poker University. All rights reserved. mtt • автор GTO_Wizard Как анализировать ICM префлоп-диапазоны В новой статье разбирается пошаговый алгоритм анализа ICM-сценариев на основе готовой библиотеки решений GTO Wizard.
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Exan13Poker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Poker University | 13” (@Exan13Poker), 2,597 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Exan13Poker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.