Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 25 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Oct 2026, 02:15
122
+1
10 Sept 2026, 17:57
121
-1
9 Sept 2026, 20:22
122
no change
7 Sept 2026, 17:47
122
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 22 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
45 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
22
48.9%
❤
10
22.2%
🥰
6
13.3%
👍
4
8.89%
❤🔥
1
2.22%
👎
1
2.22%
👏
1
2.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#Evolutionx #A17 #Unofficial #Gapps #Shiba #Husky #Akita
EvolutionX 12.1 UNOFFICIAL | Android 17
Google Pixel 8 Series (Pixel 8 / 8 Pro / 8a)
Build Date: 05/09/2026
Maintainer: LeeGarGold / LeeGarChat
The ultimate power-user build of EvolutionX for the Pixel 8 family: engineered with native ROM source modifications for unrestricted visual and UI tailoring, paired with runtime Pine hooks via PixelExtraParts (PEP), l…
Is the latest test version sufficiently stable? For example, I don't see any critical issues, and I want to switch to developing the new version of dfe neo.
Therefore, I would like to clarify with you: am I allowed to release the official version?
Yes, it's stable85%
No, I found bugs15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
I'm mainly busy with work this week and next week, so I don't have much time for firmware development, which is just a hobby of mine.
Because of that, I'm keeping the changes to a minimum for now. Once I finish fixing PEP and implementing the new features, I'll announce the final build.
For now, I can only test in the evenings by compiling one build at a time. During the day, I focus on my actual work, and whenever…
Does Android have an auto-lock feature that can be triggered by custom conditions?
I was thinking about adding a feature to PEP that would automatically lock the screen based on a timer or other conditions. For example, if you're like me and watch TikTok before going to bed, the screen could automatically lock after a certain amount of time, even if the app or media content prevents the system's normal screen timeou…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @EvoX_LeeGarChat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Is the latest test version sufficiently stable? For example, I don't see any critical issues, and I want to switch to developing the new version of dfe neo.
Therefore, I would like to clarify with you: am I allowed to release the official version?
Yes, it's stable85%
No, I found bugs15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Have you used OTA updates via the update in settings?
Yes36%
No. I did a manual update for ofox or a clean install64%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 5 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EvolutionX Unofficial | Pixel 8 / 8 Pro / 8A” (@EvoX_LeeGarChat), 122 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EvoX_LeeGarChat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
