Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Everything but your life | ПЕРЕВОД | EBYL

Channel

Everything but your life | ПЕРЕВОД | EBYL

@EverythingbutyourlifeRUS

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,509subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002021164609
TypeChannel
Username@EverythingbutyourlifeRUS
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/EverythingbutyourlifeRUS

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,5098,5588,533.57 August 2026 — 8,542 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,542 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,524 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,528 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,514 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,558 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,548 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,551 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,531 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,532 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,522 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,509 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,502–8,565 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 15:398,509-13
12 Sept 2026, 18:188,522-10
8 Sept 2026, 14:218,532+1
3 Sept 2026, 09:588,531-20
31 Aug 2026, 11:178,551+3
28 Aug 2026, 10:258,548-10
21 Aug 2026, 14:058,558+44
18 Aug 2026, 10:348,514-14
15 Aug 2026, 00:268,528+4
12 Aug 2026, 00:428,524-18
7 Aug 2026, 15:458,542no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:358,542first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3,793 reactions across 22 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,31434.6%
💘65717.3%
❤‍🔥56314.8%
🍓49112.9%
😨2235.88%
👾1995.25%
😭1283.37%
💯411.08%
💔401.05%
🔥250.659%
🕊210.554%
💊140.369%
💋120.316%
🤩120.316%
👻110.29%
😎100.264%
🙏90.237%
😢80.211%
🍌30.079%
🐳30.079%
7 further kinds90.237%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,793 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 22 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EverythingbutyourlifeRUS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈4,050 views532 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️ #EBYL_art ⭐️⭐️ 🥹 #oto #Hibiki #FailureBoy. . .🥹@EBYL.rus

334💘97🍓53❤‍🔥15🕊8👾7🔥7🙏4

Signed ﹫fᥱs͟͟ɦᥣ . ݁

10 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈4,360 views237 reactionsread 28 August 2026

⭐️ ⭐️⭐️@EBYL.rus⭐️ ✏️ Доставка офф мерча теперь доступна и для РФ, стоит $23 ( ≈ 1900 рублей)

💘15533🍓28❤‍🔥9👻4💊4👾3💯1

Signed ﹫fᥱs͟͟ɦᥣ . ݁

28 Jun 2026, 10:03 UTC≈8,680 views488 reactions7 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️ #EBYL_plush ⭐️⭐️ 🥹 #FailureBoy . . .🥹@EBYL.rus

338👾51💘48🍓18❤‍🔥11👻7💊4💋4

Signed ﹫' 𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘩𝘭 𓈒

26 Jun 2026, 10:27 UTC≈8,480 views474 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

⭐️ ⭐️⭐️ @EBYL.rus ⭐️ ✏️Ото: Всем привет! Следующие 2 месяца я буду в путешествии, так что скорее всего мне придется взять перерыв до конца августа! Я постараюсь выпустить одну главу за это время, но я не могу точно сказать, когда это будет. Мои друзья и семья уговаривают меня сделать перерыв, чтобы я наконец-то смогли провести с ними время и хорошо отдохнуть, хаха...

❤‍🔥278💘67😭6533💔12🍓7🔥4💊3

23 Jun 2026, 13:12 UTC≈8,350 views424 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️ #EBYL_art ⭐️⭐️ ✏️Ото: Ни один из них не выживет в лазертаге. Хотя если серьёзно, Хибики бы ни за что не смог «застрелить» Фейлбоя — его бы замучила совесть, да и всё это время он бы страдал (слишком любит соревноваться). А Фейлбой просто врезался бы в стену и вырубился. Но так было смешнее. 🥹 #Hibiki #FailureBoy . . .🥹@EBYL.rus

286❤‍🔥52🍓35💘24🕊8👾6🔥5💅2

21 Jun 2026, 11:58 UTC≈7,520 views201 reactionsread 28 August 2026

⭐️⭐️⭐️ @EBYL.rus ⭐️⭐️ ✏️Викторина подошла к концу. 🤍🤩Хотелось бы узнать, как вам и сколько у вас правильных ответов? Хотели бы видеть ещё какие-то интерактивы в будущем? Если да и у вас есть идеи, была бы рада услышать их в комментариях или в боте - @Ebylowner_bot 🤏

❤‍🔥12032💘20💯10🍓6🔥6👾3💊3

21 Jun 2026, 11:57 UTC≈6,310 views66 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

20 ⌗ ⋮ Настоящее имя Спейда...😚

  1. Алар12%
  2. Ниллео12%
  3. Лео24%
  4. Латус23%
  5. Микото29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🍓36💘147👾6❤‍🔥2💯1

21 Jun 2026, 11:54 UTC≈5,640 views79 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

19 ⌗ ⋮ Кто из ниже перечисленных персонажей является единственным человеком с которым Орпита может разговаривать сам, а не с помощью телефона?🥹

  1. Винни34%
  2. Спейд13%
  3. Руен39%
  4. Данаэ14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💘52🍓136👾6❤‍🔥2

21 Jun 2026, 11:51 UTC≈4,700 views68 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

18 ⌗ ⋮ Чьей идеей было отправить Хибики в клуб морской биологии? 🧕

  1. Селорис23%
  2. Винни13%
  3. Он сам туда пошел6%
  4. Хирун13%
  5. Орпиты46%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💘44❤‍🔥6🍓6👾52💔2😎2🙏1

21 Jun 2026, 11:48 UTC≈4,450 views102 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

17 ⌗ ⋮ Кого Фэйлбой игнорит уже 4 года?(😭)

  1. Слейтфокс51%
  2. Руен19%
  3. Орпиту9%
  4. Ахиллеса22%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😨61😭21💘6🍓3💯32❤‍🔥2👾2

21 Jun 2026, 11:45 UTC≈4,500 views120 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

16 ⌗ ⋮ Сколько раз за весь комикс улыбнулся фб? 😽

  1. 346%
  2. 119%
  3. 522%
  4. 722%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😨89❤‍🔥13🍓8💘4👾2😎21💔1

21 Jun 2026, 11:42 UTC≈4,560 views74 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

15 ⌗ ⋮ Кто из ниже перечисленных персонажей находится сразу в двух школьных клубах?

  1. Винни26%
  2. Орпита48%
  3. Хирун18%
  4. Хибики8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤‍🔥41💘10👾9🍓6💋41💯1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @EverythingbutyourlifeRUS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 16 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jun 2026, 11:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,410 voters approx.

20 ⌗ ⋮ Настоящее имя Спейда...😚

  1. Алар12%
  2. Ниллео12%
  3. Лео24%
  4. Латус23%
  5. Микото29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Jun 2026, 11:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,410 voters approx.

19 ⌗ ⋮ Кто из ниже перечисленных персонажей является единственным человеком с которым Орпита может разговаривать сам, а не с помощью телефона?🥹

  1. Винни34%
  2. Спейд13%
  3. Руен39%
  4. Данаэ14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Jun 2026, 11:51 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,480 voters approx.

18 ⌗ ⋮ Чьей идеей было отправить Хибики в клуб морской биологии? 🧕

  1. Селорис23%
  2. Винни13%
  3. Он сам туда пошел6%
  4. Хирун13%
  5. Орпиты46%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Jun 2026, 11:48 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,500 voters approx.

17 ⌗ ⋮ Кого Фэйлбой игнорит уже 4 года?(😭)

  1. Слейтфокс51%
  2. Руен19%
  3. Орпиту9%
  4. Ахиллеса22%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Jun 2026, 11:45 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,500 voters approx.

16 ⌗ ⋮ Сколько раз за весь комикс улыбнулся фб? 😽

  1. 346%
  2. 119%
  3. 522%
  4. 722%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Jun 2026, 11:42 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,500 voters approx.

15 ⌗ ⋮ Кто из ниже перечисленных персонажей находится сразу в двух школьных клубах?

  1. Винни26%
  2. Орпита48%
  3. Хирун18%
  4. Хибики8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Визуальные новеллы для Android | VienDesu! Porting Team
@visual_novels_for_android · 57,942
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026
ALIEN STAGE 👽
@ALNSTG · 51,049
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 25 August 2026
the promise of hope [тпох]🕊
@tpohope · 112,556
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Everything but your life | ПЕРЕВОД | EBYL” (@EverythingbutyourlifeRUS), 8,509 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EverythingbutyourlifeRUS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.