Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for •𝗫•

Channel

•𝗫•

@EveryDayLibrary

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,513subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001783207816
TypeChannel
Username@EveryDayLibrary
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/EveryDayLibrary

Growth

2,5132,5442,528.56 August 2026 — 2,543 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,543 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,544 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,540 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,521 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,513 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,508–2,549 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:472,513-8
13 Aug 2026, 00:142,521-19
9 Aug 2026, 15:122,540-4
6 Aug 2026, 23:452,544+1
6 Aug 2026, 14:462,543no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:372,543first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 32s
Average length
3m 32s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

188 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7137.8%
🕊4021.3%
custom 52446072855226299922412.8%
🔥2111.2%
❤‍🔥115.85%
🤨73.72%
👎63.19%
👍42.13%
💔42.13%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 5 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jan 2026, 20:26 UTC≈2,140 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026

رمقی برایمان نمانده... به امید اروم شدن اوضاع و برگشت به روال عادی(البته نه روال عادی قبل- بلکه یک تغییر اساسی) تا اطلاع ثانوی پستی گذاشته نخواهد شد.

🕊4021🤨7

4 Jan 2026, 14:26 UTC≈2,080 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📕 #مطالعه_روزانه کتاب امروز ۱۴ دی • امروز چه کتابی خوندید؟ • نظرتون در مورد کتاب بگید. • ارزش خوندن داشت؟ چه نکته‌ای یاد گرفتید؟ •𝗫• @EveryDayLibrary

8custom 52446072855226299922

3 Jan 2026, 18:01 UTC≈1,570 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Oppression always begins with a minority, but it only succeeds when the majority chooses to remain spectators. ستم همیشه با اقلیت شروع می‌شود، اما فقط وقتی پیروز می‌شود که اکثریت تصمیم بگیرد تماشاگر بماند. الی ویزل شب @EveryDayLibrary

🔥16👎1

3 Jan 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,290 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📕 #مطالعه_روزانه کتاب امروز ۱۳ دی • امروز چه کتابی خوندید؟ • نظرتون در مورد کتاب بگید. • ارزش خوندن داشت؟ چه نکته‌ای یاد گرفتید؟ •𝗫• @EveryDayLibrary

custom 52446072855226299925👎1

2 Jan 2026, 21:27 UTC969 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#خاطرات_نویسنده_ها نلسون ماندلا وقتی برای اولین بار قدم به سلولم در جزیره روبن گذاشتم، با سه قدم طول و سه قدم عرض، دیوارها انگار مرا می‌بلعیدند. من زندانی شماره ۴۶۶/۶۴ بودم؛ دیگر نامی نداشتم، فقط یک عدد بودم. زندانبان‌ها می‌خواستند با این کار، کرامت انسانی ما را لِه کنند. آن‌ها می‌خواستند ما باور کنیم که هیچ هستیم. صبح‌ها ساعت ۵:۳۰ با صدای زنگ بیدار می‌شدیم. سرمای سلول تا مغز استخوان نفوذ می‌کرد. ما را به معدن سنگ آ

15👍1

2 Jan 2026, 16:54 UTC704 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

When everyone is responsible, no one is accountable—and that is precisely when disaster becomes ordinary. وقتی همه مسئول‌اند، هیچ‌کس پاسخ‌گو نیست؛ و این دقیقاً همان لحظه‌ای‌ست که فاجعه عادی می‌شود. نورمن میلر ترانه دژخیم @EveryDayLibrary

7👍3👎1

2 Jan 2026, 16:33 UTC648 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📕 #مطالعه_روزانه کتاب امروز ۱۲ دی • امروز چه کتابی خوندید؟ • نظرتون در مورد کتاب بگید. • ارزش خوندن داشت؟ چه نکته‌ای یاد گرفتید؟ •𝗫• @EveryDayLibrary

5

2 Jan 2026, 11:41 UTC598 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

انیمیشن این هفته: This land is mine

3👎1

2 Jan 2026, 11:41 UTC557 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/8tIdCsMufIY?si=ajNo7mVR2XBDb6Ft

👎1

1 Jan 2026, 19:06 UTC573 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#خاطرات_نویسنده_ها فیودور داستایوفسکی اگر بخواهم تصویری از جهنم ترسیم کنم، آن تصویر نه شعله‌های آتش، بلکه "حمام زندان" ما در سیبری بود. یک روزِ بسیار سرد، اجازه یافتیم به حمام برویم. فضایی کوچک، تاریک و پوشیده از دود که شاید برای چند نفر جا داشت، اما بیش از صد زندانی را در آن تپانده بودند. وقتی در را باز کردم، با دیواری از بخارِ غلیظ و بوی تعفن مواجه شدم. هیچ جا برای نشستن نبود. روی زمین، روی پله‌ها و حتی لبه‌های پن

❤‍🔥73👎1custom 52446072855226299921

1 Jan 2026, 18:53 UTC666 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The worst form of control is when a person believes they are free, having forgotten even the language of protest. بدترین شکل کنترل آن است که فرد تصور کند آزاد است، در حالی که حتی زبان اعتراض را از یاد برده. ناتانیل وست دل‌شکسته @EveryDayLibrary

6❤‍🔥4

1 Jan 2026, 16:33 UTC837 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📕 #مطالعه_روزانه کتاب امروز ۱۱ دی • امروز چه کتابی خوندید؟ • نظرتون در مورد کتاب بگید. • ارزش خوندن داشت؟ چه نکته‌ای یاد گرفتید؟ •𝗫• @EveryDayLibrary

🔥51

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @EveryDayLibrary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 952,349 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

پادکست کتاب صوتی رمان داستان
@Bo_p2 · 118,242
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
کتاب نایاب
@ketabnayyab · 89,224
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“•𝗫•” (@EveryDayLibrary), 2,513 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EveryDayLibrary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.