رمقی برایمان نمانده... به امید اروم شدن اوضاع و برگشت به روال عادی(البته نه روال عادی قبل- بلکه یک تغییر اساسی) تا اطلاع ثانوی پستی گذاشته نخواهد شد.
🕊40❤21🤨7

Channel
@EveryDayLibrary
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,513subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001783207816 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EveryDayLibrary |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EveryDayLibrary |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 2,513 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 2,521 | -19 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 2,540 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 2,544 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 2,543 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 2,543 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
188 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 71 | 37.8% | |
| 🕊 | 40 | 21.3% | |
| custom 5244607285522629992 | 24 | 12.8% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 11.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 5.85% | |
| 🤨 | 7 | 3.72% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 3.19% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 2.13% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 2.13% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 5 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
رمقی برایمان نمانده... به امید اروم شدن اوضاع و برگشت به روال عادی(البته نه روال عادی قبل- بلکه یک تغییر اساسی) تا اطلاع ثانوی پستی گذاشته نخواهد شد.
🕊40❤21🤨7
📕 #مطالعه_روزانه کتاب امروز ۱۴ دی • امروز چه کتابی خوندید؟ • نظرتون در مورد کتاب بگید. • ارزش خوندن داشت؟ چه نکتهای یاد گرفتید؟ •𝗫• @EveryDayLibrary
❤8custom 52446072855226299922
Oppression always begins with a minority, but it only succeeds when the majority chooses to remain spectators. ستم همیشه با اقلیت شروع میشود، اما فقط وقتی پیروز میشود که اکثریت تصمیم بگیرد تماشاگر بماند. الی ویزل شب @EveryDayLibrary
🔥16👎1
📕 #مطالعه_روزانه کتاب امروز ۱۳ دی • امروز چه کتابی خوندید؟ • نظرتون در مورد کتاب بگید. • ارزش خوندن داشت؟ چه نکتهای یاد گرفتید؟ •𝗫• @EveryDayLibrary
custom 52446072855226299925👎1
#خاطرات_نویسنده_ها نلسون ماندلا وقتی برای اولین بار قدم به سلولم در جزیره روبن گذاشتم، با سه قدم طول و سه قدم عرض، دیوارها انگار مرا میبلعیدند. من زندانی شماره ۴۶۶/۶۴ بودم؛ دیگر نامی نداشتم، فقط یک عدد بودم. زندانبانها میخواستند با این کار، کرامت انسانی ما را لِه کنند. آنها میخواستند ما باور کنیم که هیچ هستیم. صبحها ساعت ۵:۳۰ با صدای زنگ بیدار میشدیم. سرمای سلول تا مغز استخوان نفوذ میکرد. ما را به معدن سنگ آ…
❤15👍1
When everyone is responsible, no one is accountable—and that is precisely when disaster becomes ordinary. وقتی همه مسئولاند، هیچکس پاسخگو نیست؛ و این دقیقاً همان لحظهایست که فاجعه عادی میشود. نورمن میلر ترانه دژخیم @EveryDayLibrary
❤7👍3👎1
📕 #مطالعه_روزانه کتاب امروز ۱۲ دی • امروز چه کتابی خوندید؟ • نظرتون در مورد کتاب بگید. • ارزش خوندن داشت؟ چه نکتهای یاد گرفتید؟ •𝗫• @EveryDayLibrary
❤5
انیمیشن این هفته: This land is mine
❤3👎1
https://youtu.be/8tIdCsMufIY?si=ajNo7mVR2XBDb6Ft
👎1
#خاطرات_نویسنده_ها فیودور داستایوفسکی اگر بخواهم تصویری از جهنم ترسیم کنم، آن تصویر نه شعلههای آتش، بلکه "حمام زندان" ما در سیبری بود. یک روزِ بسیار سرد، اجازه یافتیم به حمام برویم. فضایی کوچک، تاریک و پوشیده از دود که شاید برای چند نفر جا داشت، اما بیش از صد زندانی را در آن تپانده بودند. وقتی در را باز کردم، با دیواری از بخارِ غلیظ و بوی تعفن مواجه شدم. هیچ جا برای نشستن نبود. روی زمین، روی پلهها و حتی لبههای پن…
❤🔥7❤3👎1custom 52446072855226299921
The worst form of control is when a person believes they are free, having forgotten even the language of protest. بدترین شکل کنترل آن است که فرد تصور کند آزاد است، در حالی که حتی زبان اعتراض را از یاد برده. ناتانیل وست دلشکسته @EveryDayLibrary
❤6❤🔥4
📕 #مطالعه_روزانه کتاب امروز ۱۱ دی • امروز چه کتابی خوندید؟ • نظرتون در مورد کتاب بگید. • ارزش خوندن داشت؟ چه نکتهای یاد گرفتید؟ •𝗫• @EveryDayLibrary
🔥5❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @EveryDayLibrary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 952,349 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“•𝗫•” (@EveryDayLibrary), 2,513 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EveryDayLibrary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.