🌟 :: забыла сказать, что лайф полностью уходит в рест вместе со мной... Никаких репостов, новых союзов и тп не будет. Мне реально нужен отдых.❤️ Всех люблю целую.
❤3🔥2

Channel
@EverlastLF
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002181161221 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EverlastLF |
| Description | ИНФО-КАНАЛ: @EverlastFloodd |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EverlastLF |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 6 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 6 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 70.6% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 29.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2025 to 6 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EverlastLF. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 February 2025 to 6 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌟 :: забыла сказать, что лайф полностью уходит в рест вместе со мной... Никаких репостов, новых союзов и тп не будет. Мне реально нужен отдых.❤️ Всех люблю целую.
❤3🔥2
🌟 :: важный вопрос к владельцам флудов.... Был ли момент, когда вы хотели закрыть свой проект? Как вы перебороли это желание...?
🌟 :: сажусь наконец то делать переданные эстафеты... Ура? Ура! Надеюсь... Кхем. В общем, хоть лайф и в ресте, я готова заключать союзы с людьми! Вот правда... Даже список вечером сделаю, так что всем союзникам попрошу скинуть в комментарии названия своего лайфа в МОНО! #Важное_EV :: #Репост_EV
❤2🔥1
⠀〰〰〰 ◜#Бинго ◞ ;; @EverlastLF ✨ `` 🦋 🤩 Feixiao 📰 🤩 🌟 — Благодарю @S3R3NITYlife 〃🌟 за переданную эстафету. 🎀🎀🎀🎀 Буду рада видеть и от своих участников результаты!:) ➖➖ Правила 🙂 1. Заполнить бинго. 2. Передать эстафету не менее пяти союзникам. ➖➖ Передаю эстафету: А МОЖНО ВСЕМ ЖЕЛАЮЩИМ....??? У меня союзов не так много, да и большинству уже передали наверное– @FallenS…
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ⌜📍𝓒 𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗌📍⌟ channel:; @S3R3NITYlife; owner:; @KJKESS; ≪🤩≫ —. Сегодня в нашем флуде состоялась чистка. Подведём итоги! ❝удалены за неактив❞ 🎀раппа ❝удалены за отсутствие нормы❞ 🎀коломбина ❝appeal❞ мы нуждаемся в активных участниках, готовых стать частью нашего дружного и уютного коллектива, где каждый сможет найти собеседника, а интерактивы не дадут заскучать! Мест 20/40 ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ❝END POST❞ По всем …
𝙑𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙤 𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙤𝙧ー𝙠𝙖𝙯𝙪𝙝𝙖 вы оплату натурой берёте? 𝚍𝚘𝚗'𝚝 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚐𝚎𝚝 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 #Рᴇᴨᴏᴄᴛ𝑚𝑥 #ʙидᴇᴏ𝑚𝑥 ー‾‾‾‾‾🪷‾‾‾‾‾ー
🔥1
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ⌜📍𝓝 𝖾𝗐 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈📍⌟ channel:; @S3R3NITYlife; owner:; @KJKESS; ``💥 慈イ。 -ˋ . 𝘑𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘠𝘶𝘢𝘯 `` 《👤》—. Новое видео от Цзин Юаня! Фух, чуть не попал в слова ЛМАО, ИЗВИНЯЮСЬ ЗА КАЧЕСТВО, ТГ БЕСПОЩАДНО ЖРЕТ 👊🏻👊🏻 🎀Id: наша(?) 🎀Поддержать нас вы сможете по ссылочке:; https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8YjFTor/ #video
⠀〰〰〰 ◜#союз ◞ ;; @EverlastLF ✨ Союз – это не просто красивые слова, это обязательства, которые мы берём на себя. Каждый поступок имеет значение, и именно они формируют наше будущее. РАЗРЫВ СОЮЗА! Причина: закрытие проекта. Инфо: @infvoikab Лайф: @lifevoikab Фд: секай. Доверенное лицо: @zelkeq
🔥1
──────⊹⊱✫⊰⊹──────: ⋆ ˚。⋆୨୧˚ ˚୨୧⋆。˚ ⋆: ⏝ִ︶:𝓚𝓸𝓴𝓸𝓶𝓲 。 ゚ ・ * . ゚. давайте чут чут пополним список союзников в моем флуде.. #𝗦𝗛𝗜𝗧_𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗧_𓆩𝓭𝓯𓆪
🌟 :: я, кстати, не сразу заметила запись. Извиняюсь.
⠀〰〰〰 ◜#видео ◞ ;; @EverlastLF ✨ 〰〰〰〰〰〰 🌟 :: Рест рестом, а видео по расписанию! Не оставлять же все на Зарянку с Март, верно? Создатель: Фэйсяо. #Видео_EV ;; #Репост_EV
❤5
🌟 :: лайф временно уходит в рест на n-ное количество времени. Я постараюсь делать репосты, но это не факт. Простите, родные!!! #Репост_EV ;; #Важное_EV
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EverlastLF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,369,919 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@EverlastLF named 14 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐸𝑉𝐸𝑅𝐿𝐴𝑆𝑇 ᶫᶦᶠᵉ • rest” (@EverlastLF), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EverlastLF.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.