3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 342–350 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 20:14
349
+6
6 Aug 2026, 21:32
343
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:49
343
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.3%
avg views ÷ 349 subscribers
Avg views / post
155
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
11 (22 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,702
Reactions total
158
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
158 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
89
56.3%
❤
55
34.8%
💯
9
5.70%
👏
4
2.53%
🔥
1
0.633%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Although the European Parliament is currently in its summer recess, our Members of the European Parliament remain active across their home countries, continuing to engage with citizens and promote our political message. We have compiled some of the highlights of 2026 in this photo gallery.
+++ Ceuta under attack +++
Tomorrow, the LIBE Committee of the European Parliament will hold a special meeting on the recent events in Ceuta — made possible by ESN, which helped secure a common-sense majority.
The situation is far from over. Europe’s external border must be defended, illegal crossings must be stopped, and those responsible must be held accountable.
Ceuta is a warning: without secure borders, Schen…
No matter how absurd debates in the European Parliament – and especially in the FEMM Committee – may become, one fact remains unchanged: there are only two genders!
🚨 Ceuta Is Being Overrun: 2015 Must Not Be Repeated
Thousands of illegal migrants have once again crossed into the Spanish exclave of Ceuta. Europe cannot afford to repeat the mistakes of 2015.
Mary Khan, Coordinator of the ESN group in the Committee of civil liberties in the European Parliament:
“Illegal entries must not be rewarded with redistribution across Europe. The EU's external borders must be brought back…
https://youtube.com/shorts/Z98CkuQz574
+++ Ceuta Is a Wake-Up Call for All of Europe +++
Thousands of illegal migrants have stormed the border fences in Ceuta. The images are a stark reminder of 2015 – and Brussels must not allow such a loss of control to happen again.
That is why we, the AfD delegation within the ESN Group, are calling for a special session of the European Parliament. In 2022, Parliament was conv…
https://youtu.be/fgHgfP7F2Ek
+++ Behind the Scenes +++
What happens behind the camera is just as important as what ends up on screen.
During the ESN Study Days in Madrid, our team captured meetings, interviews, discussions and impressions from across the program to document our work and the ideas shaping a Europe of sovereign nations.
Here's a look behind the scenes of the production.
https://youtu.be/wkeBFgAHH7Y
During our Study Days in Madrid, ESN Members met with representatives from VOX to discuss one of Europe's biggest challenges: illegal migration.
Spain's decision to legalise more than 500,000 illegal migrants has consequences far beyond its own borders. Once regularised, they are able to move freely across the European Union.
The discussions also focused on Europe's energy security, th…
https://youtu.be/0A6e5PL6dtg
+++ ESN Study Days in Madrid +++
During our Study Days in Madrid, the ESN Group focused on one of Europe’s most urgent challenges: energy security.
The message is clear: Europe cannot remain competitive with unstable grids, exploding energy prices and ideological dependence on volatile renewables. A strong industrial future needs reliable, affordable and controllable energy — including…
A strong team for the true Europe.
27 Members of the European Parliament from 9 countries – united to protect our European culture, our identity, our languages, and our sovereign nations.
+++ Strong nations. Safe Europe. +++
Europe must be built on sovereign nations — not on Brussels centralisation.
Secure borders, democratic self-determination and free peoples are the foundation of a safer Europe.
That is what ESN stands for.
❤14👍7
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @EuropeofSovereignNations. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 502,515 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔴 Europe of Sovereign Nations” (@EuropeofSovereignNations), 349 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EuropeofSovereignNations.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.