Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𐙚⊹ ࣪ ˖𝗘𝙩𝒆𝙧ɴ𝒂𝙡 𝙎𝙪𝙜𝒂𝙧 𝘤𝘰𝘰𝘬𝘪𝘦「🪽」๋࣭ #ANTIПОМОЙСЯ

Channel

𐙚⊹ ࣪ ˖𝗘𝙩𝒆𝙧ɴ𝒂𝙡 𝙎𝙪𝙜𝒂𝙧 𝘤𝘰𝘰𝘬𝘪𝘦「🪽」๋࣭ #ANTIПОМОЙСЯ

@EternalSugar_bzz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

98subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003991574617
TypeChannel
Username@EternalSugar_bzz
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 28 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/EternalSugar_bzz

Growth

9810410111 August 2026 — 100 subscribers11 August 2026 — 100 subscribers18 August 2026 — 104 subscribers26 August 2026 — 101 subscribers11 September 2026 — 98 subscribers11 August 202611 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 97–105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 18:3698-3
26 Aug 2026, 20:03101-3
18 Aug 2026, 22:23104+4
11 Aug 2026, 01:00100no change
11 Aug 2026, 00:47100first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

81 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52291980509661509263138.3%
❤‍🔥1822.2%
💘1417.3%
custom 52288473024619231291012.3%
❤67.41%
💋22.47%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC36 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Сапп: Прогрлосуйте кто нибудь хотя бы 1 голос

custom 52291980509661509265custom 52288473024619231292💋1

9 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC40 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🎀🎀🌟🌟🥹🥹🥹🎀🪽🪽 🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽 🥹🪽🥹«➖х, какой же сегодня чудесный, залитый солнцем день! Мой сад просто утопает в мягком розовом цветении, а воздух наполнен ароматом спелых персиков и сахарной ваты. Я устроилась на самом пушистом облачке и просто наслаждаюсь этой бесконечной негой...🤩 А как проходит ваш день, мои сладкие? Напишите, чем вы занимаетесь, балуете ли себя чем-нибудь вкусненьким или тоже ленитесь под тёёёплыми лучами…

custom 52291980509661509266❤‍🔥3💘2💋1custom 52288473024619231291

8 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC50 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Сапп: Завтра будут посты, честно

custom 52291980509661509265💘2

31 Jul 2026, 16:28 UTC116 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🎀🎀🌟🌟🥹🥹🥹🎀🪽🪽 🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽 🤩 :: 🤩:У меня не бывает похуданий, я не такой же человек как вы! Я жирее, я тяжелее, я шире вас! Я не обхудавшая шавка, которою все объедают, а она ещё и писмыкается! На кой чёрт я вам тогда нужен? Всю мою жизнь меня пытаются объедать, с самого рождения. Худущие люди, наделённые бигмаками, пытаются заткнуть мне ими рот, превратить меня в жирную послушную тушу и это у них получилось. Потому, что я…

custom 52291980509661509265❤3💘3

31 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTC111 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🎀🎀🌟🌟🥹🥹🥹🎀🪽🪽 🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽 🤩 :: здравствуй, Этернал Шугар! у тебя в саду, просто прелестно! у меня к тебе пару вопросов: как ты относишься к тому, что тебя шипперят с Мистик Флаур? и как в принципе ты относишься к ней? 🥹🪽🥹«➖х, ангелок, спасибо за комплимент моему саду! Рада, что ты оценил эту сладость. ➖ насчёт шиппов с Мистик Флаур... 🔹а-ха, ну вы и выдумываете! Хоть и относимся нормально, но это не повод шипперить нас, з…

❤‍🔥2💘2❤1custom 52291980509661509261

30 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC100 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🎀🎀🌟🌟🥹🥹🥹🎀🪽🪽 🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽🪽 🥹🪽🥹«➖х, мои сладкие, как же славно было немного отдохнуть... Мои прекрасные облака баловали меня прохладным зефирным ветерком, а время в саду тянулось так лениво и безмятежно. Я почти забыла обо всём на свете! Но теперь я вернулась в наш уютный блог, полная сил и готовности окунуться в сладость общения с вами. И знаете, оглядевшись вокруг, я вдруг заметила странную тишину... Скажите-ка, мои хорош…

❤1❤‍🔥1custom 52288473024619231291custom 52291980509661509261

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EternalSugar_bzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𐙚⊹ ࣪ ˖𝗘𝙩𝒆𝙧ɴ𝒂𝙡 𝙎𝙪𝙜𝒂𝙧 𝘤𝘰𝘰𝘬𝘪𝘦「🪽」๋࣭ #ANTIПОМОЙСЯ” (@EternalSugar_bzz), 98 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EternalSugar_bzz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.