Everyday I feel guilty for previously believing the lies about North Korea. These images can't be easily found through a quick Google search, I went all the way to a Chinese museum's website. That's because the US doesn't want us to see them. The Empire will never admit it has committed genocide. It will hide all proof and build a convenient, false narrative that benefits it. It will lie to you. Attempting to anni…

Channel
Erges
@ErgesArchive
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002601235597 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ErgesArchive |
| Description | Profile: @solaceful_thaumazein «Order prevails in Berlin!», you foolish lackeys! Your order is built on sand. Tomorrow the Revolution will rise up again and to your horror it will proclaim with blazing trumpets: «I was, I am, I shall be». |
| First recorded | 14 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ErgesArchive |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:23 | 9 | no change |
| 13 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 9 | +1 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 14:39 | 8 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 9 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 155.6%
- avg views ÷ 9 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 14.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (9 August 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 14 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Oct 2026, 16:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 20
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 27s
- Average length
- 27s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Fascism was able to rise to power because there wasn't 'enough' communism, and it was defeated by communism (the USSR). The reason so many people in Western countries are being lost to fascism isn't that they're stupid, nor that they're uneducated; it's because there isn't enough communism around, no one is out there speaking about a socialist alternative. Working-class people, disappointed by liberal centrists, hav…
Marking history, AfD, the far-right German party, won 44% of the votes in the regional Saxony-Anhalt elections yesterday. In order to fight fascism, we first need to understand what it is, how it developed, and how today's fascism differs from 20th-century fascism. In the late 1800s, the 2nd Industrial Revolution hit Europe, the economy boomed and, soon enough, it reached a peak where European markets became saturat…
Have you ever met someone who shares the same moral values as you, who genuinely seems a good person, but has completely different political positions? If so, you are probably experiencing a knowledge gap and the person with the greater insight usually understands how the other thinks. For me, my morals are pretty simple: I envision a better world with no poverty, war, exploitation, discrimination or oppression of a…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @ErgesArchive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Erges” (@ErgesArchive), 9 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ErgesArchive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.