Channel
@EowlStack
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
45subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 9 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001477926575 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EowlStack |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 2 April 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EowlStack |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 03:01 | 45 | +9 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 09:22 | 36 | no change |
| 9 Nov 2026, 08:47 | 36 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 April 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 April 2021 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 202 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 09:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (66.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✨ از امکانات این ربات ممبرگیر بگم و نقطه تمایزش اینه خودکار امتیاز میده پنل ساده ای داره ✅ کاربر رو جریمه میکنه اگر زود از کانالت لفت بده 💪 خیلی راحت امتیاز میده محدودیت نداره 😍 ممبرای قدیمی و تکراری نمیتونن امتیاز بگیرن فقط واقعی ❌ این ربات فوق العاده است همین الان امتحانش کنید👇 https://t.me/gemMember_bot?start=ref_7063610296
🚀 ممبر واقعی و رایگان برای کانالت می‌خوای؟ 🤖 عضوگیری خودکار، بدون هزینه: 👉 https://t.me/gemMember_bot?start=ref_5851265011 ✅ ممبر واقعی | ⚡️ سریع | 💎 پاداش دعوت
💎 ممبرگیر الماسی | Gem Member 🚀 افزایش رایگان ممبر کانال و گروه تلگرام! 💎 با ربات ممبرگیر الماسی، به‌سادگی برای رشد و افزایش اعضای کانال و گروهت اقدام کن. ✨ ممبر واقعی و کاملاً رایگان ⚡️ ممبرگیری سریع و آسان 👥 مناسب کانال‌ها و گروه‌های تلگرامی که نیاز به عضوگیری واقعی دارند 🤖 شروع کن و گروه و کانالاتو با ممبرگیر الماسی بساز! 👇 برای شروع روی لینک زیر بزن 🔗 https://t.me/gemMember_bot?start=ref_5851265011
در کامنت ابزار نظر کنید بعد چند سال برگشتم کار جالبیه؟
کتابخانه Splus client مناسب نوشتن ربات و اتوماسیون برای پیامرسان داخلی سروش پلاس به زبان پایتون 🐍 با این کتابخانه پایتون میتونید بدون اینکه درگیر پیچیدگی های پیاده سازی کلاینت بشید ربات سروش پلاس بنویسید 👌 https://github.com/RezaR2D/splus-client نصب سریع : pip install splus-client نشراگه بدید خوب کردید ✅
سلام رضا منفرد هستم منو با رضا پی اچی پی سابق میشناختید از 2016 تا 2021 میخوام برگردم به کار دوباره اینبار دوتا سورس هست اوپنشون میکنم همینجا بمولا زیر ساختی ان زیر ساخت ربات سلف روی اکانت در پیام رسان های ایتا و سروش پلاس ایتا به زبان php نوشته شده و سروش پلاس python و هردوتا از یه زیر ساخت مشترک استفاده میکنن حمایت کنید داداشیا بریم دنیارو بگا بدیم بمولا ❤️🔥❤️🔥 دوباره چنلو احیا کنیم
بدون فراگیری دانش خاصی یا صرف وقت و هزینه گزافی ربات تلگرامی خود را بسیار آسان ایجاد کنید و به دلخواه توسعه دهید و به هدفتان در کمترین زمان ممکن و آسان ترین شیوه نزدیک شوید👌 کاملا رایگان ✅ دارای امنیت بالا 🛡 سرعت و کیفیت فراوان 🚀 مدیریت حرفه ای اسان کاربران👥 مدیریت آسان ربات 😉💎 ابزار های کارآمد و امکانات بی شماره برای توسعه ربات ( نظیر ساخت دکمه دلخواه ، مدیریت دکمه ها ، مدیریت حرفه ای محتوا ) 🌟 ایجاد دکمه های…
File, posted without a caption
@vkm_bot 👈 more music
@vkm_bot 👈 more music
دلتنگم شدین جون دلا؟
یالا برگردون دگ لاشی برگردون😂😂😂 @For_no_onee🀄️
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EowlStack. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EOwL company” (@EowlStack), 45 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EowlStack.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.